Mathematics and Financial Economics

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 369–381 | Cite as

Household risk aversion and portfolio choices



In practice, stock investment is one of the most important decisions made by households. The primary goal of this paper is to explain family investment decisions under the assumptions of household member’s preferences and efficient risk sharing based on the collective household model. In particular, by examining the absolute (relative) risk aversion of the household welfare function, we demonstrate how household’s portfolio allocation in stocks changes with family wealth. We examine two types of preference heterogeneity between family members: parameter heterogeneity and functional form heterogeneity. This study offers an alternative explanation of household portfolio choice corresponding with the observation that wealthier households tend to hold greater share of their wealth in risky assets. Specifically, if two decision-makers have standard constant relative risk aversion preference with different relative risk aversions in a household, family’s relative risk aversion decreases as household wealth increases (decreasing relative risk aversion).


Household portfolio choice Risk aversion Household welfare function 

JEL Classification



  1. 1.
    Apps, P., Andrienko, Y., Rees, R.: Risk and precautionary saving in two-person households. Am. Econ. Rev. 104(3), 1040–1046 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barsky, B., Juster, F.T., Kimball, M., Shapiro, M.: Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Q. J. Econ. 112(2), 537–579 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bertaut, C., Starr-McCluer, M.: Household Portfolios, Chap. 5. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bourguignon, F., Chiappori, P.A.: Collective models of household behavior: an introduction. Eur. Econ. Rev. 36(1992), 355–365 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Browning, M.: The saving behavior of a two-person household. Scand. J. Econ. 102(2), 235–251 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cass, D., Stiglitz, J.: The structure of investor preferences and asset returns, and separability in portfolio allocation: a contribution to the pure theory of mutual funds. J. Econ. Theory 1970(2), 122–160 (1970)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiappori, P.A.: Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 56(1), 63–90 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chiappori, P.A.: Collective labor supply and welfare. J. political Econ. 100(3), 437–467 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Denuit, M., Eeckhoudt, L., Schlesinger, H.: When Ross meets Bell: the linex utility function. J. Math. Econ. (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eeckhoudt, L., Gollier, C., Schlesinger, H.: Economic and Financial Decisions under Risk. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eeckhoudt, L., Schlesinger, H.: Putting risk in its proper place. Am. Econ. Rev. 96, 280–289 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gollier, C.: Economics of Risk and Time. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gollier, C.: What Does the Classical Theory Have to Say About Household Portfolios?. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, C., Litzenberg, R.: Foundations for Financial Economics. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc, London (1988)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kimball, S.M.: Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica 58(1), 53–73 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mazzocco, M.: Saving, risk sharing, and preferences for risk. Am. Econ. Rev. 94(4), 116–182 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merton, R.C.: Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous-time case. Rev. Econ Stat. 51(3), 247–257 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neelakantan, U., Lazaryan, N., Lyons, A., Nelson, C.: Portfolio Choice in a Two-Person Household. Working paper (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Polkovnichenko, V.: Life-cycle portfolio choice with additive habit formation preferences and uninsurable labor income risk. Rev. Financ. Stud. 20(1), 83–124 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Samuelson, P.A.: Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming. Rev. Econ. Stat. 51(3), 239–246 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wachter, J.A., Yogo, M.: Why do household portfolio shares rise in wealth? Rev. Financ. Stud. 23(11), 3929–3965 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA

Personalised recommendations