Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Using a Birth Center Model of Care to Improve Reproductive Outcomes in Informal Settlements—a Case Study

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The world is becoming increasingly urban. For the first time in history, more than 50% of human beings live in cities (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, ed. (2015)). Rapid urbanization is often chaotic and unstructured, leading to the formation of informal settlements or slums. Informal settlements are frequently located in environmentally hazardous areas and typically lack adequate sanitation and clean water, leading to poor health outcomes for residents. In these difficult circumstances women and children fair the worst, and reproductive outcomes for women living in informal settlements are grim. Insufficient uptake of antenatal care, lack of skilled birth attendants and poor-quality care contribute to maternal mortality rates in informal settlements that far outpace wealthier urban neighborhoods (Chant and McIlwaine (2016)). In response, a birth center model of maternity care is proposed for informal settlements. Birth centers have been shown to provide high quality, respectful, culturally appropriate care in high resource settings (Stapleton et al. J Midwifery Women’s Health 58(1):3–14, 2013; Hodnett et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000012, 2012; Brocklehurst et al. BMJ 343:d7400, 2011). In this paper, three case studies are described that support the use of this model in low resource, urban settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, ed. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, (ST/ESA/SER.A/366). New York, New York: United Nations; 2015. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Report.pdf. Accessed September 17, 2017

  2. Chant S, McIlwaine C. Gender and health. an urban penalty for slum-dwelling women? In: Cities, slums and gender in the global south. New York, New York: Routledge; 2016:113-136.

  3. Stapleton S, Osborne C, Illuzzi J. Outcomes of care in birth centers: Demonstration of a durable model. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health. 2013;58(1):3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hodnett ED, Downe S, Walsh D. Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(8):CD000012.

  5. Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J, et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: The birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343(d7400).

  6. Unger A, Riley LW. Slum health: From understanding to action. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):1561–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barbiero VK. Urban health: It's time to get moving! Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(2):139–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. UN Habitat, ed. Urbanization and development: Emerging futures. World Cities report 2016. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme; 2016. http://wcr.unhabitat.org/main-report/#section_eleven. Accessed February 23, 2018.

  9. Mahabira R, Crooksa A, Croitorua A, Agouris P. The study of slums as social and physical constructs: Challenges and emerging research opportunities. Regional Studies, Regional Science. 2016;3(1):399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. UN-Habitat, ed. The challenge of slums: Global report on human settlements. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-Habitat; 2003. http://mirror.unhabitat.org/pmss/listItemDetails.aspx?publicationID=1156. Accessed March 1, 2018.

  11. Gilbert A. The return of the slum: does language matter? Int J Urban Reg Res. 2007;31(4):697–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00754.x.

  12. Mberu B, Mumah J, Kabiru C, Brinton J. Bringing sexual and reproductive health in the urban contexts to the forefront of the development agenda: The case for prioritizing the urban poor. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(7):1572–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Save the Children. State of the world's mothers 2015. The urban disadvantage. 2015. http://www.savethechildren.org/atf/cf/%7B9def2ebe-10ae-432c-9bd0-df91d2eba74a%7D/SOWM_2015.PDF. Accessed July 30, 2015.

  14. WHO, UN-Habitat, eds. Hidden cities: Unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, The WHO Centre for Health Development and United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT); 2010. http://www.who.int/kobe_centre/publications/hiddencities_media/who_un_habitat_hidden_cities_web.pdf. Accessed September 20, 2017.

  15. Mberu BU, Haregu TN, Kyobutungi C, Ezeh AC. Health and health-related indicators in slum, rural, and urban communities: A comparative analysis. Glob Health Action. 2016;9(1):33163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sclar ED, Garau P, Carolini G. The 21st century health challenge of slums and cities. Lancet. 2005;365(9462):901–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sverdlik A. Ill-health and poverty: A literature review on health in informal settlements. Environment & Urbanization. 2011;3(1):123–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meleis A. Developing urban areas as if gender matters. In: Meleis A, Birch E, Wachter S, editors. Women's health and the world's cities. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2011. p. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frenk J, Gomez-Dantes O. Women's health and the city: A comprehensive approach for the developing world. In: Meleis A, Birch E, Wachter S, editors. Women's health and the world's cities. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2011. p. 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hazarika I. Women's reproductive health in slum populations in India: Evidence from NFHS-3. J Urban Health. 2010;87(2):264–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chant S, McIlwaine C. Gendered access to land and housing in cities and slums. In: Cities, slums and gender in the global south. New York, New York: Routledge; 2016:71–92.

  22. UN-Habitat, ed. State of the World’s Cities 2010/2011. Bridging the urban divide. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-Habitat; 2008. https://unhabitat.org/books/state-of-the-worlds-cities-20102011-cities-for-all-bridging-the-urban-divide/. Accessed March 1, 2018.

  23. Chant S, McIlwaine C. Gender-based violence in cities and slums. In: Cities, slums and gender in the global south. New York, New York: Routledge; 2016:137–155.

  24. Corburn J, Hildebrand C. Slum sanitation and the social determinants of women's health in Nairobi. Kenya. J Environ Public Health. 2015;2015:209505.

  25. McNab S, Freedman L, eds. Maternal newborn health and the urban poor: A global scoping. New York, New York: Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health; 2016. http://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/hnn-content/uploads/AMDD-Urban-MNH-Report_July-20-2016-Final-Report.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2017.

  26. Anastasi E, Ekanem E, Hill O, Adebayo Oluwakemi A, Abayomi O, Bernasconi A. Unmasking inequalities: Sub-national maternal and child mortality data from two urban slums in Lagos, Nigeria tells the story. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Riley LW, Ko AI, Unger A, Reis MG. Slum health: Diseases of neglected populations. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2007;7:2-698X-7-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Coast E, McDaid D, Leone T, et al. What are the effects of different models of delivery for improving maternal and infant health outcomes for poor people in urban areas in low income and lower middle-income countries? 2012. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/41908/1/What_are_the_effects_of_different_models_of_delivery_for_improving_maternal_and_infant_outcomes_for_poor_people_in_urban_areas_in_low_income_and_lower_middle_income_countries_%28LSERO%29.pdf . Accessed November 5, 2015.

  29. Kruk ME, Kujawski S, Moyer CA, et al. Next generation maternal health: External shocks and health-system innovations. Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2296–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Devasenapathy N, Ghosh Jerath S, Allen E, Sharma S, Shankar AH, Zodpey S. Reproductive healthcare utilization in urban poor settlements of Delhi: Baseline survey of ANCHUL (ante natal and child health care in urban slums) project. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:212. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0635-8.

  31. Ziraba AK, Madise N, Mills S, Kyobutungi C, Ezeh A. Maternal mortality in the informal settlements of Nairobi City: What do we know? Reprod Health. 2009;6:6-4755-6-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. APHRC, ed. Because labor won't wait...harnessing the potential of public-private partnerships for better maternal, newborn and child health in urban informal settlements in Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: The African Population and Health Research Center; 2014. http://aphrc.org/archives/publications/because-labor-wont-wait. Accessed February 13, 2017.

  33. Campbell OM, Calvert C, Testa A, et al. The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: A pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2176–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fotso JC, Mukiira C. Perceived quality of and access to care among poor urban women in Kenya and their utilization of delivery care: Harnessing the potential of private clinics? Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(6):505–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ziraba AK, Mills S, Madise N, Saliku T, Fotso JC. The state of emergency obstetric care services in Nairobi informal settlements and environs: Results from a maternity health facility survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:46-6963-9-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alcock G, Das S, Shah More N, et al. Examining inequalities in uptake of maternal health care and choice of provider in underserved urban areas of Mumbai, India: A mixed methods study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:231-015-0661-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0661-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. WHO. Strengthening nursing and midwifery. 2011; WHA 64.7 (64th World Assembly). http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA64/A64_R7-en.pdf?ua=1. Accessed March 10, 2018.

  39. Renfrew M, McFadden A, Bastos M, et al. Midwifery and quality care: Findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. The Lancet. 2014;384:1129–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shaw D, Guise JM, Shah N, et al. Drivers of maternity care in high-income countries: Can health systems support woman-centered care? Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2282–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. ten Hoope-Bender P, de Bernis L, Campbell J, et al. Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. Lancet. 2014;384(9949):1226–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Davis-Floyd R, Barclay L, Daviss B, Tritten J. Birth models that work – Introduction. Berekely and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press; 2009. p. 1–27.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. International Confederation of Midwives. ICM international definition of the midwife. http://www.internationalmidwives.org/who-we-are/policy-and-practice/icm-international-definition-of-the-midwife/. Updated 2017. Accessed February 10, 2017.

  44. King TL, Pinger W. Evidence-based practice for intrapartum care: The pearls of midwifery. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(6):572–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. McIntyre MJ. Safety of non-medically led primary maternity care models: A critical review of the international literature. Aust Health Rev. 2012;36(2):140–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Alliman J, Phillippi JC. Maternal outcomes in birth centers: An integrative review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016;61(1):21–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD004667.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. ACOG. Obstetric care consensus no. 2: Levels of maternal care. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(2):502–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Woo VG, Lundeen T, Matula S, Milstein A. Achieving higher-value obstetrical care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):250.e1–250.e14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Johanson R, Newburn M, Macfarlane A. Has the medicalization of childbirth gone too far? BMJ. 2002;324(7342):892–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kyobutungi C. Accessing maternal health care services in urban slums: What do we know? Sound recording. April 19, 2011. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/accessing-maternal-health-care-services-urban-slums-what-do-we-know. Accessed May 25, 2017.

  52. Das S, Bapat U, More NS, Chordhekar L, Joshi W, Osrin D. Prospective study of determinants and costs of home births in Mumbai slums. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-38.

  53. Bohren MA, Hunter EC, Munthe-Kaas HM, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Gulmezoglu AM. Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):71. -4755-11-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Shimoda K, Horiuchi S, Leshabari S, Shimpuku Y. Midwives' respect and disrespect of women during facility-based childbirth in urban Tanzania: A qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):8-017-0447-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0447-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Banks KP, Karim AM, Ratcliffe HL, Betemariam W, Langer A. Jeopardizing quality at the frontline of healthcare: Prevalence and risk factors for disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth in Ethiopia. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(3):317–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Alzyoud F, Khoshnood K, Alnatour A, Oweis A. Exposure to verbal abuse and neglect during childbirth among Jordanian women. Midwifery. 2018;58:71–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. WHO, ed. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/260178/1/9789241550215-eng.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2018.

  58. International Confederation of Midwives. International code of ethics for midwives. 2014. http://internationalmidwives.org/assets/uploads/documents/CoreDocuments/CD2008_001%20V2014%20ENG%20International%20Code%20of%20Ethics%20for%20Midwives.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2018.

  59. Miller S, Lalonde A. The global epidemic of abuse and disrespect during childbirth: History, evidence, interventions, and FIGO's mother-baby friendly birthing facilities initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl 1):S49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ghoshal R. Bade logon ki tarah: Pregnant and poor in the city. Inter-Asia Cult Stud. 2015;16(2):160–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kruk ME, Leslie HH, Verguet S, Mbaruku GM, Adanu RM, Langer A. Quality of basic maternal care functions in health facilities of five African countries: An analysis of national health system surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(11):e845–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Miller S, Cordero M, Coleman AL, et al. Quality of care in institutionalized deliveries: The paradox of the Dominican Republic. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;82(1):89–103. discussion 87-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Vanneste AM, Ronsmans C, Chakraborty J, De Francisco A. Prenatal screening in rural Bangladesh: From prediction to care. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Bang RA, Bang AT, Reddy MH, Deshmukh MD, Baitule SB, Filippi V. Maternal morbidity during labour and the puerperium in rural homes and the need for medical attention: A prospective observational study in Gadchiroli. India. BJOG. 2004;111(3):231–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Bailey PE, Szaszdi JA, Glover L. Obstetric complications: Does training traditional birth attendants make a difference? Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2002;11(1):15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Penwell V. Mercy in action. Philippine birth center statistics. Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2004;70(70):56–7.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jolly SP, Chowdhury TR, Quayyum T, et al, eds. Role of BRAC maternity and delivery centres in urban community in improving maternal and newborn health. Research Monograph Series 70 ed. Dhaka, Bangladesh: BRAC Research and Evaluation Division; 2017. http://research.brac.net/new/all-monographs/role-of-brac-maternity-and-delivery-centres-in-urban-community. Accessed March 12, 2018.

  68. Khan M, Ahmed S. The "Birthing Hut" facilities of Manoshi. 2009; Working Paper No.7. http://dspace.icddrb.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6733/1/Manoshi-WP07.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2015.

  69. Kaosar A, Alam A, Chowdhury M, et al. MANOSHI. A programme for improving maternal, neonatal and child health in the urban slums of Bangladesh. 2007; Working Paper No.1. http://dspace.icddrb.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6726/2/Manoshi-WP01.pdf. Accessed October 26, 2015.

  70. Banu M, Nahar S, Nasreen HE. Assessing the MANOSHI referral system. addressing delays in seeking emergency obstetric care in Dhaka's slums. 2010; Working Paper No.10. http://dspace.icddrb.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6736/1/Manoshi-WP10.pdf. Accessed March 27, 2017.

  71. Alam N, Begum D, Ahmed S, Streatfield P. MANOSHI COMMUNITY HEALTH SOLUTIONS IN BANGLADESH. Impact evaluation surveys in Dhaka urban slums 2007, 2009 and 2011. 2011; Scientific Report No.118. http://dspace.icddrb.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6779/1/Manoshi%20Evaluation%20Surveys%20Report11_Final.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2015.

  72. Socorro De los Santos M. ed. Report on documentation and evaluation of urban HEART pilot in the Philippines. WHO; 2013. http://www.who.int/kobe_centre/publications/Philippines.pdf. Accessed February 26, 2018.

  73. Sarr P, Kasturiarachchi C, Yang H, Co C, Shimpo FA, Morimata J. Investigating the motivating factors behind high delivery rates of the urban HEART birthing facility in San Martin de Porres, Philippines. Journal of the National Institute of Public Health. 2010;59(1):64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Mercy in Action. Mercy in Action- Philippines clinic. http://www.mercyinaction.com/philippines-clinic. Accessed March 13, 2018.

  75. Penwell V. Mercy in Action. Bringing mother- and baby-friendly birth centers to the Philippines. In: Davis-Floyd R, Barclay L, Daviss B, Tritten J, editors. Birth models that work. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press; 2009. p. 337–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  76. Davis-Floyd R, Pascali-Bonaro D, Sagady Leslie M. Gomez Ponce de Leon, R. The International MotherBaby childbirth Initiative: Working to create optimal maternity care worldwide. International Journal of Childbirth. 2011;1(3):196–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Travis P, Bennett S, Haines A, et al. Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the millennium development goals. Lancet. 2004;364(9437):900–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16987-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Lassi ZS, Musavi NB, Maliqi B, et al. Systematic review on human resources for health interventions to improve maternal health outcomes: Evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14:10-016-0106-y. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-016-0106-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren MA, et al. Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: A qualitative evidence synthesis. BJOG. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15015.

  80. Coast E, Jones E, Lattof SR, Portela A. Effectiveness of interventions to provide culturally appropriate maternity care in increasing uptake of skilled maternity care: A systematic review. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(10):1479–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Miller T, Smith H. Establishing partnership with traditional birth attendants for improved maternal and newborn health: A review of factors influencing implementation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):365-017-1534-y. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1534-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Downe S, Lawrie TA, Finlayson K, Oladapo OT. Effectiveness of respectful care policies for women using routine intrapartum services: A systematic review. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):23-018-0466-y. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0466-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847; discussion e1001847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. WHO. Midwives' voices, midwives’ realities. Findings from a global consultation on providing quality midwifery care. Geneva, Switzerland. 2016. Crawford S., Taylor G and McConville F., eds. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250376/1/9789241510547-eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed February 13, 2017.

  85. Filby A, McConville F, Portela A. What prevents quality midwifery care? A systematic mapping of barriers in low and middle income countries from the provider perspective. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0153391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Graham W, Woodd S, Byass P, et al. Diversity and divergence: The dynamic burden of poor maternal health. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2164–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to Drs. Nauruj Jahan and Tamjida Hanfi Sohni of BRAC for their help in introducing me to the Manoshi Project and their continued generous support over the years. In addition, I am very grateful for the knowledge and assistance of Dr. Afsana Kaosar of BRAC. Lastly, I am indebted to Dr. Henry Perry, for his enthusiastic support and advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Global Health Consultant, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Jacqueline Wallace

Authors
  1. Jacqueline Wallace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline Wallace.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wallace, J. Using a Birth Center Model of Care to Improve Reproductive Outcomes in Informal Settlements—a Case Study. J Urban Health 96, 208–218 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0257-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0257-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation