Abstract
Community indicator projects have the potential to deliver new knowledge about the quality of life in local communities and drive actions to improve them (Phillips 2003; Holden Social Indicators Research 92:429–448, 2009; Memon and Johnstone 2008). However, the connection between the information produced by community indicator projects and the actions taken to improve conditions in communities remains under-researched (Holden Social Indicators Research 92:429–448, 2009; Hezri and Dovers Ecological Economics 60:86–99, 2006). This is because community indicator projects have mainly been conceptualized as producing information for action rather than as part of an action process (Memon and Johnstone 2008). This paper provides a case study of a community indicator project with an explicit plan to move beyond the data and into action. A review of one of the oldest community indicator projects in the United States, the Santa Cruz County Community Assessment Project (CAP) demonstrates how an action oriented community improvement cycle has contributed to measurable improvements for children and youth in one California County. The paper identifies key elements that were important for turning CAP data into local actions and concludes with lessons for community indicator practitioners and questions for future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applied Survey Research (2000). Santa Cruz County community assessment project (pp. 1–338). Santa Cruz, California.
Applied Survey Research (2009a). Safe schools/healthy students: Report to the community (pp. 1–8). Santa Cruz, California.
Applied Survey Research (2009b). Santa Cruz County community assessment project (pp. 1–280). Santa Cruz, California.
Chambers, M. (2004). Quality indicators for progress: A guide to community quality-of-life assessments. Jacksonville: Jacksonville Community Council Inc.
Cobb, C., & Rixford, C. (1998). Lessons learned from a history of social indicators. San Francisco: Redefining Progress.
Conner, L. (2009). Director, Healthy Kids, Santa Cruz County. Video interview, October 16th 2009, at http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/projects/cap.html.
Dluhy, M., & Swartz, N. (2006). Connecting knowledge and policy: the promise of community indicators in the United States. Social Indicators Research, 79(1), 1–23.
Friedman, M. (2005). Trying hard is not good enough: How to produce measurable improvements for customers and communities. Victoria: Trafford Publishing.
Goeke, M.L. (2010). Executive Director, United Way of Santa Cruz County. Phone interview March 18, 2010.
Go for Health (2004). A comprehensive plan to increase healthy nutrition and regular physical activity among children and youth in Santa Cruz County. http://www.unitedwaysc.org/media/Go_For_Health_Plan--_EmailWeb_version.pdf.
Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. (1992). Communities that care: Action for drug abuse. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Hezri, A., & Dovers, S. (2006). Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: issues for ecological economies. Ecological Economics, 60, 86–99.
Holden, M. (2009). Community interests and indicator system success. Social Indicators Research, 92, 429–448.
Hutchison, J., & Vidal, A. (2004). Symposium: using social capital to help integrate planning theory, research and practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 142–192.
Kalantari, S. (2009). Director, Go For Health and Jovenes SANOS, Santa Cruz County. Video interview, October 16th 2009, at http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/projects/cap.html.
Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. A Report to the Balaton Group. Hartland Four Corners: Sustainability Institute.
Memon, A., & Johnstone, K. (2008). Institutional barriers to developing community indicators in New Zealand: A preliminary assessment. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, Issue 1, May, 70–91.
Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(1), 23–42.
Park, R., & Seidman, D. (1978). Social indicators and social reporting. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 435, America in the Seventies: Some Social Indicators, Jan., 1978, 1–22.
Perez, L. (2009). Director, Safe Schools/Healthy Students, Pajaro Valley Unified School District. Video interview, October 16th 2009 at http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/projects/cap.html.
Phillips, R. (2003). Community indicators. Planning Advisory Service, Report Number 517, American Planning Institute.
Results Leadership Group. (2010). Results based accountability testimonials from local United Ways. Bethesda: Results Leadership Group.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science, 4, 155–169.
Salvaris, M. (1997). Citizenship and progress. Conference paper presented at Measuring National Progress: A National Conference on Indicators of the Quality and Sustainability of Life in Australia, Canberra, 3–4 July 1997. http://www.anewnz.org.nz/attachments/docs/spre-ms-citizenship-progress.doc.
Santa Cruz County Agricultural Commissioner (2009). Santa Cruz County 2008 Crop Report.
Santa Cruz County, California Presidential General Election, November 4, 2008, Official Elections Results.
Sawicki, D. (2002). Improving community indicator systems: Injecting more social science into the folk movement. Planning Theory and Practice, 3(1), 13–32.
Smolko, R., Strange, C., & Venetoulis, J. (2006). Community indicators handbook. Redefining Progress, San Francisco.
State of California, Department of Finance. (2009). Race/ethnic population with age and sex detail 2000–2050. Sacramento: Department of Finance.
Watkins, M. (2010). County Superintendent of Schools, Santa Cruz County Office of Education. E-mail with authors, March 4, 2010.
Wolfe, G. (2009). Former Director, Health Services Agency, Santa Cruz County. Video interview, October 16th 2009, at http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/projects/cap.html.
Zachary, D. (2007). Connecting outcomes to indicators: The Santa Cruz County California community assessment project (CAP). Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases III, 1–20.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestion for improving this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zachary, D., Brutschy, S., West, S. et al. Connecting Data to Action: How the Santa Cruz County Community Assessment Project Contributes to Better Outcomes for Youth. Applied Research Quality Life 5, 287–308 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-010-9103-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-010-9103-9