Save (some of) the Children
In “Save the Children!” Artúrs Logins responds to my argument that, in certain cases, it is morally permissible to not prevent something bad from happening, even when one can do so without sacrificing something of comparable moral importance. Logins’ responses are thought-provoking, though I will argue that his critiques miss their mark. I rebut each of the responses offered by Logins. However, much of my focus will be on one of his criticisms which rests on an unfortunately common misunderstanding of Singer’s argument in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” My response, then, is important not only because it salvages my positive argument, but also because it identifies, and corrects, this misunderstanding.
Keywordsglobal poverty famine relief Peter Singer global justice shallow pond
- Dreier, J. (2011). In defense of consequentializing. In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics vol. 1, ed. M. Timmons, 97–119 New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Singer, P. (1972). Famine, affluence and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–243.Google Scholar
- Singer, P. (2009). The life you can save. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Singer, P. (2016). The most good you can do: How effective altruism is changing ideas about living ethically. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar