Advertisement

Strategic orientation and performance of new ventures: empirical studies based on entrepreneurial activities in China

Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the strategic orientation and performance of new ventures. Based on organizational ambidexterity theory, we formed five hypotheses to describe the relationships among entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, and technological orientation, as well as their impact on new venture performance. Using a sampling of 199 new ventures, the regression results reveal that exploration-entrepreneurial orientation and exploitation–technological orientation have a significant impact on entrepreneurial performance, whereas exploitation–market orientation does not. Interaction between entrepreneurial orientation and technological orientation shows a significant positive impact on entrepreneurial performance.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial orientation Market orientation Technological orientation Exploration Exploitation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Supported by Support by Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (71572208), the program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, NCET.

References

  1. Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Amason, A.C., Shrader, R.C., & Tompson, G.H. (2006). Newness and novelty: relating top management team composition to new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, B. S., & Eshima, Y. (2011). The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). The influence of top management team functional diversity on strategic orientations: the moderating role of environmental turbulence and inter-functional coordination. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(3), 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2009). The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becherer, R. C., & Maurer, J. G. (1997). The moderating effect of environmental variables on the entrepreneurial and marketing orientation of entrepreneur-led firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
  8. Berthon, J. P., Pitt, L., Abratt, R., & Nel, D. (2008). Icon and markor: links and performance in south African firms. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 15–34.Google Scholar
  9. Bhidé, A. (2000). The origin and evolution of new businesses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bierly, P., & Daly, P. (2007). Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 493–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brouwer, M. (2000). Entrepreneurship and uncertainty: innovation and competition among the many. Small Business Economics, 15(2), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cano, C. R., Carrillat, F. A., & Jaramillo, F. (2004). A meta-analysis of the relationship between market orientation and business performance: evidence from five continents. International Journal of Research in Marketing. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.07.001.Google Scholar
  13. Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardon, M. S., Zietsma, C., Saparito, P., Matherne, B. P., & Davis, C. (2005). A tale of passion: new insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Casillas, J. C., & Moreno, A. M. (2010). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth: the moderating role of family involvement. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3–4), 265–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Dewhurst, F. (2007). Linking organizational learning and customer capital through an ambidexterity context: an empirical investigation in SMEs. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1720–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chaganti, R., Chaganti, R., & Mahajan, V. (1989). Profitable small business strategies under different types of competition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(3), 21–35.Google Scholar
  18. Chang, T. Z., Chen, S. J., Mehta, R., Polsa, P., & Mazur, J. (1999). The effects of market orientation on effectiveness and efficiency: the case of automotive distribution channels in Finland and Poland. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(4/5), 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, X., Zou, H., & Wang, D. T. (2009). How do new ventures grow? Firm capabilities, growth strategies and performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheng, Y. T., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1996). Learning the innovation journey: order out of chaos? Organization Science, 7(6), 593–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Choi, Y. R., Lévesque, M., & Shepherd, D. A. (2008). When should entrepreneurs expedite or delay opportunity exploitation? Journal of Business Venturing, 23(3), 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C. W. (1998). The determinants of new venture performance: an extended model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 5–29.Google Scholar
  23. Cooper, R. G. (1985). Industrial firms’ new product strategies. Journal of Business Research, 13(2), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2012). The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 677–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.Google Scholar
  27. Danneels, E., & Kleinschmidtb, E. J. (2001). Product innovativeness from the firm’s perspective: its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(6), 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Desarbo, W. S., Anthony, C., Benedetto, D., Song, M., & Sinha, I. (2005). Revisiting the miles and snow strategic framework: uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Deshpandé, R., & Farley, J. U. (1998). Measuring market orientation: generalization and synthesis. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 2(3), 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Deutscher, F., Zapkau, F. B., Schwens, C., Baumc, M., & Kabst, R. (2016). Strategic orientations and performance: a configurational perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 849–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategic, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ensley, M., Pearson, A., & Amason, A. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4), 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gao, G. Y., Zhou, K. Z., & Yim, B. (2007). On what should firms focus in transitional economies? Astudy of the contingent value of strategic orientations in China. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gao, J., Cheng, Y., & Li, X. B. (2008). Global entrepreneurship monitor China report. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2006). New venture growth: areview and extension. Journal of Management, 32(6), 926–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gnizy, I., Baker, W. E., & Grinstein, A. (2014). Proactive learning culture: adynamic capability and key success factor for SMEs entering foreign markets. International Marketing Review, 31(5), 477–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grinstein, A. (2008). The relationships between market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 42(1/2), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Guo, H., Tang, J., & Su, Z. (2014). To be different, or to be the same? The interactive effect of organizational regulatory legitimacy and entrepreneurial orientation on new venture performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3), 665–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hakala, H. (2011). Strategic orientations in management literature: three approaches to understanding the interaction between market, technology, entrepreneurial and learning orientations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance—is innovation a missing link. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Han, H. K., Kim, N., & Kim, B. (2001). Entry aarriers: adull-, one-, or two-edged sword for incumbents? Unravelingthe paradox from a contingency perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hay, M., Verdin, P., & Williamson, P. (1993). Successful new ventures: lessons for entrepreneurs and investors. Long Range Planning, 26(5), 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hills, G., Hultman, C., & Miles, M. (2008). The evolution and development of entrepreneurial marketing. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J., & Borza, A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hmieleski, K. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2008). The contrasting interaction effects of improvisational behavior with entrepreneurial self-efficacy on new venture performance and entrepreneur work satisfaction. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(4), 482–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ho, J., Plewa, C., & Lu, V. N. (2016). Examining strategic orientation complementarity using multiple regression analysis and fuzzy set QCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2199–2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hult, G. T. M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). Does market orientation matter?:a test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22(9), 899–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jansen, J. J., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: the moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jantunen, A., Nummela, N., Puumalainen, K., & Saarenketo, S. (2008). Strategic orientations of born globals: do they really matter? Journal of World Business, 43(2), 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jeong, I., Pae, J. H., & Zhou, D. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of the strategic orientations in new product development: the case of Chinese manufacturers. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 348–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jiao, H., Alon, I., Koo, C. K., & Cui, Y. (2013). When should organizational change be implemented? The moderating effect of environmental dynamism between dynamic capabilities and new venture performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30(2), 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kaya, N., & Seyrek, I. H. (2005). Performance impacts of strategic orientations: evidence from Turkish manufacturing firms. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(1), 68–71.Google Scholar
  58. Keh, H. T., Nguyen, T. T. M., & Ng, H. P. (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 592–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Khaire, M. (2005). Great oaks from little acorns grow: strategies for new venture growth. Academy of Management Proceedings. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2005.18782294.Google Scholar
  60. Knotts, T., Jones, S., & Brown, K. (2008). The effect of strategic orientation and gender on survival: astudy of potential mass merchandising suppliers. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Koeller, C. T., & Lechler, T. G. (2006). Economic and managerial perspectives on new venture growth: an integrated analysis. Small Business Economics, 26(5), 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2001). Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: Acordia’s corporate entrepreneurship strategic. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kyriakopoulos, K., & Moorman, C. (2004). Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation and exploration strategies: the overlooked role of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Langerak, F. (2003). An appraisal of research on the predictive power of market orientation. European Management Journal, 21(4), 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Li, J. J. (2005). The formation of managerial networks of foreign firms in China: the effects of strategic orientations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(4), 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Li, C., Shi, Y., Wu, C., Wu, Z., & Zheng, L. (2016). Policies of promoting entrepreneurship and angel investment: evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review. doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2016.08.011.Google Scholar
  68. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
  69. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2005). A test of strategic orientation formation versus strategic orientation implementation: the influence of TMT functional diversity and inter-functional coordination. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 13(2), 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Miller, D. (1987). Strategic making and structure: analysis and implications for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Moreno, A. M., & Casillas, J. C. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMEs: acausal model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 507–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Morgan, T., Anokhin, S., Kretinin, A., & Frishammar, J. (2015). The dark side of the entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation interplay: a new product development perspective. International Small Business Journal, 33(7), 731–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nevens, T. M., Summe, G. L., & Uttal, B. (1990). Commercializing technology: what the best companies do? Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 154–163.Google Scholar
  77. Noble, C. H., Sinha, R. K., & Kumar, A. (2002). Market orientation and alternative strategic orientations: alongitudinal assessment of performance implications. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ostgaard, T. A., & Birley, S. (1996). New venture growth and personal networks. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Paladino, A. (2007). Investigating the drivers of innovation and new product success: acomparison of strategic orientations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 534–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Paladino, A. (2009). Financial champions and masters of innovation: analyzing the effects of balancing strategic orientations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(6), 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Panigyrakis, G., & Theodoridis, P. K. (2007). Market orientation and performance: an empirical investigation in the retail industry in Greece. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(2), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Patel, P. C., & Cooper, D. (2013). The harder they fall, the faster they rise: approach and avoidance focus in narcissistic CEOs. Strategic Management Journal, 35(10), 1518–1540.Google Scholar
  83. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: apath model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
  87. Sinkovics, R. R., & Roath, A. S. (2004). Strategic orientation, capabilities, and performance in manufacturer - 3PL relationships. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(2), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sirén, C. A., Kohtamäki, M., & Kuckertz, A. (2012). Exploration and exploitation strategies, profit performance, and the mediating role of strategic learning: escaping the exploitation trap. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(1), 18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Smart, D. T., & Conant, J. S. (1994). Entrepreneurial orientation, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(3), 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Söderblom, A., Samuelssona, M., Wiklunda, J., & Sandberg, R. (2015). Inside the black box of outcome additionality: effects of early-stage government subsidies on resource accumulation and new venture performance. Research Policy, 44(8), 1501–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tsai, W. M. H., MacMillan, I. C., & Low, M. B. (1991). Effects of strategy and environment on corporate venture success in industrial markets. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tushman, M. L., Reilly, O., & Charles III, A. (1996). Organizations: managing evolutionary. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Venkataram, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wales, W. J. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation: areview and synthesis of promising research directions. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zahra, S., & Bogner, W. (2000). Technological strategic and software new venture performance: the moderating effect of the competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 135–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zahra, S., & Covin, J. (1995). Contextual influence on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zahra, S. A., & Nielsen, A. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & El-Hagrassey, G. M. (2002). Competitive analysis and new venture performance: understanding the impact of strategic uncertainty and venture origin. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2007). How does strategic orientation matter in Chinese firms? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4), 447–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2010). How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. H., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technological- and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zimmerman, M. A., and Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431.Google Scholar
  108. Zott, C. (2003). Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra industry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zou, H., Chen, X., & Ghauri, P. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of new venture growth strategic: an empirical study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 393–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolCentral University of Finance and EconomicsBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations