Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 25, Issue 13, pp 12299–12302 | Cite as

Better kitchens and toilets: both needed for better health

  • Khaiwal Ravindra
  • Kirk R. Smith
Trend Editorial


Both poor water, sanitation, hygiene (WaSH) and household air pollution (HAP) adversely affect the health of millions of people each year around the globe and specifically in developing countries. The objective of current work is to highlight the importance of HAP in parallel to WaSH for decision making to achieve better health specially in developing countries. There are examples, where developing countries are strengthening efforts to tackle the issue of poor water and sanitation such as ‘Clean India Mission’ was recently launched by the Government of India. However, there is lack of actions to address the issue related to HAP—to extend the coverage of clean fuel, efficient stoves and ventilated kitchens to the deprived population under the ‘Clean India Mission’. Most of the rural household and urban slums in developing countries have only a single room, where people cook and sleep. This leads them to exposure to toxic HAP, which can be minimized by developing country specific indoor air quality guidelines and action framework. Hence, there should be policies to provide them not only the subsidy for clean fuel but also to build properly ventilated kitchens along with the promotion of clean toilets and water supplies. There is a need to strengthen global efforts, to jointly address the challenges associated with the risks related to WaSH and HAP in order to efficiently reduce the global burden of disease. Further, this will also help to timely attain the sustainable development goals for better health and environment.


Water Sanitation Household air pollution Liquefied petroleum gas Fuel choice Cookstoves 


Environmental factors have been associated with about 25% of the disease burden and premature mortality globally (Prüss-Üstün and Corvalán 2006). However, mortality and morbidity caused by diseases due to environmental factors vary between different age groups, genders and health care facilities in developed and developing regions. As per the recent estimate of Global Burden of Disease, air pollution alone stands at 1st rank as a major risk factor for premature death and disabilities in India, whereas unsafe water and poor sanitation is ranked 6th among major risk factors (IHME 2015). Unsafe drinking water, poor sanitation and hygiene are main attributes for diarrhoea having estimated 94% burden of disease due to environmental factors. Whereas household air pollution (HAP) due to burning of biomass for cooking is a major contributor for lower respiratory infections and a range of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). This indicates that these household-level environmental risks together kill millions of people each year around the world and are particularly important in developing countries.

Results and discussion

A recent WHO report highlights that around 3 billion people still use solid biomass fuels for cooking and other purposes (WHO 2014). Further, it was estimated that HAP is responsible for 4.3 million premature deaths globally through air pollution exposure. Global Burden of Disease estimated that from the year 1990 to 2013, COPD remains at mean rank of eight in top 25 leading causes of global years lived with disability (YLDs) with a median percentage change of about 72% resulting in mean YLDs from 15,151,000 to 26,131,000 respectively for the year 1990 and 2013 (Vos et al. 2015).

Health implications are more serious in developing countries. For example, the WHO country profile identifies that HAP in India alone attributed approximately 1.2 million premature deaths and 42.5 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for the year 2012 and had COPD as fifth contributor in top ten causes of YLDs in year 2013 (Fig. 1). Further, the relative risks of disease burden due to HAP are higher among the vulnerable population (women, children and elderly) in rural areas due to daily exposure during cooking using solid biomass fuels.
Fig. 1

Household air pollution attributable deaths (a) and disability-adjusted life years (b) in both sexes in India, 2012 (data source: WHO, 2014)

Similarly for WaSH—another ancient household risk—the recent estimate for 2015 shows that around 2.4 billion of world population still lacks the improved sanitation facilities (UNICEF-WHO 2015). This report also highlights that one out of eight people worldwide still defecate in the open. The situation is worse in developing countries, for example, in India there is only moderate progress in use of sanitation facilities from 1990 to 2015. Further, in 2015, 44% of the Indian population defecated in the open—10% of urban and 61% of rural population (Ravindra and Mor 2013; UNICEF-WHO 2015). The United Nation Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) number 6 targets equitable access to safe drinking water and sanitation for all; whereas, Goal 7 also aims to provide universal access to modern energy including improved and efficient products, e.g. improved cookstoves and clean fuels (UN SDG 2015).

Further, the health impact of poor WaSH and HAP is worst in densely populated countries like India as depicted in Table 1. Around 67% of the Indian population living in the rural areas still lack proper WaSH and HAP conditions. Indeed, they are in dire need of improved sanitation facilities, affordable clean fuel and improved stoves. However, there are efforts by both international organisations and by countries themselves to address the issue of WaSH, e.g. the Clean India Mission, but less attention has been paid to tackle the issue of HAP. Inclusion of HAP in the ‘Clean India Mission’ might help prevent millions of Indians from premature death and illness.
Table 1

Comparison of global and India-specific trend of environmental burden of disease

Risk factors/year

Premature deaths/year × 1000

DALYs × 1000

Mean YLDs × 1000

% premature deaths

age < 5 years

























Water, sanitation and hygiene (diarrhoea)

















Air pollution (COPD)

















Data source—WHO, 2015 (refer as 'a'); WHO, 2016

DALYs, disability-adjusted life years; YLDs, years lived with disability

*Acute respiratory infections premature deaths

In January 2015, the Government of India launched the first of three schemes to promote LPG in poor populations (MoPNG 2015). These include PAHAL, i.e. to pay for subsidised fuel into people’s bank account (direct benefit transfer of LPG—DBTL), Give-it-Up (GIU), which focus on voluntarily giving the subsidy on LPG fuel by wealthy people and Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY)—to provide free LPG to below poverty line families (Smith 2017a). These are the largest efforts made in any low- or middle-income country to address HAP as a health issue by accelerating the natural penetration of LPG into poor populations. However, many issues remain to be resolved such as reducing the natural tendency of households to maintain some usage of biomass during the initial years of LPG use. In addition, there is a clear need to conduct major monitoring and evaluation of the current programmes to help improve its efficacy and extend it even further into remaining poor populations.

Most rural households and urban slums in developing countries have a single room, where they cook and sleep; this makes them vulnerable to toxic HAP exposure (Sidhu et al. 2017). Further, HAP can also cause considerable anthropogenic climate impact on regional and global scales (Gurjar et al. 2016; Ravindra et al. 2015; Ravindra 2017). Bond et al. (2004) reported that household emissions could account up to 25% of total black carbon emissions (8 Tg/year). Hence, the use of clean fuel in household will not only help to mitigate the adverse impact of climate change but also to gain health benefits.

If the underprivileged population cannot afford to have clean fuel including fuel-efficient cookstoves, the Government should provide them targeted subsidy for LPG connections including cookstoves and graded subsidies for the fuel, based on income. Further, they should be provided with a properly built ventilated kitchen to reduce the exposure of harmful pollutants. It could be done as part of a programme that includes provision of sanitary toilets. Smith (2017b) highlighted that LPG subsidies are insufficient to move people away from biomass because it will take a long time to reach the poorest of the poor. Hence, there is a need to provide both built toilet and better kitchen with proper ventilation to the needy families, through the expansion of WaSH-related programmes. This will certainly help to reduce the burden of disease, specifically in Asia and Africa.

It is well known that, being NCDs (Fig. 1), most health impacts due to HAP take time to develop and also to reduce; whereas, being communicable, most WaSH health impacts are immediate and thus reduce quickly. This is one reason that WaSH remains in focus for policy makers but reduction in HAP lacks behind despite having equal or more premature deaths and DALYs. Hence, there is need to develop country specific indoor air quality (IAQ) guidelines and action framework, having special focus on HAP. Building properly ventilated kitchens for families also require policy intervention and can be supported through IAQ action framework. Further, looking at the disease burden of HAP, it should also be a priority for any sensitive government specifically in Asia and Africa to minimize adverse impact of HAP. Further, there is need to address the issue holistically by giving incentive for usage of kitchen or toilet, which also requires financial, informational and social support.

Both WaSH and HAP significantly contribute to disease burden and premature mortality in developing countries. Despite that, except for India, countries where biomass is prime fuel for cooking are currently lacking actions to seriously combat HAP beyond some efforts, for example in Nepal and Mexico, to promote improved biomass stoves. These, unfortunately, have not shown success in reducing HAP sufficiently to improve health for India. Even in India, WaSH has greater priority under the Clean India Mission than HAP. Hence, it is becoming important for developing countries to use a combined approach to address the issue of WaSH and HAP. This will also help to achieve SDGs by the end of the next decade. The main aim of SDGs is to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity for all; the combined approach will help to achieve the SDG targets on time.

Traditionally, in India, the kitchen has been linked with cleanliness and hygiene. Linking WaSH with a clean kitchen and fuel will be a cost-effective approach such as when a survey is being conducted for eligible toilets, it can also have a component of type of kitchen and fuel uses. The approach of a clean kitchen should focus on proper ventilation in the kitchen and availability of clean fuel. For clean fuel (LPG), subsidy is already being provided under the PMUY scheme. Hence, there is only need to find a way to subsidise a clean kitchen and this can be done by bringing together several ministries (e.g. Ministry of Rural Development, Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation and Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas) to make a common pool of funds to promote WaSH and HAP jointly to achieve the goal of ‘better health for all’ including environmental sustainability.


Considering the findings of recent Global Burden of Diseases (IHME 2015) and WHO reports on HAP, globally there should be more focus on policies including formulation of indoor air quality guidelines and other interventions to reduce the exposure of HAP. The aim of WaSH and HAP are better hygiene and sanitation and improved indoor air quality by adopting safe sanitation practices and using clean fuels, proper ventilation and other interventions. Hence, WaSH and HAP can be combined together for better efficiency in achieving better community services and health through a common pool of ministerial funding. This will ultimately reduce the burden of disease and disability in developing countries, where it impacts the most. Further, it will also be the right start to achieve United Nation SDGs, which aim to end poverty, protect the environment and ensure prosperity for all by 2030.



Author would like to thank Dr. Rajesh Kumar for scientific discussion. RK is also grateful to DHR, ICMR for providing fellowship in the area of ‘Environmental Health’.

Funding statement

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Contributorship statement

KR designed and conceptualised the study and developed the intellectual content of the manuscript including writing and review/editing. KRS helped in scientific editing and to extend the intellectual content of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

None as secondary data was analysed.


  1. Bond TC, Streets DG, Yarber KF, Nelson SM, Woo JH, Klimont Z (2004) A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon emissions from combustion. J Geophys Res Atmos 109(D14).
  2. Gurjar BR, Ravindra K, Nagpure AS (2016) Air pollution trends over Indian megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmos Environ 142:475–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, IHME (2015) What risk factors drive the most death and disability combined? (accessed August 3, 2017)
  4. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (MoPNG) , Government of India (2015) ‘Give-it-Up’ campaign. and 27 Apr, 2016)
  5. Prüss-Üstün A, Corvalán C (2006) Preventing disease through healthy environments. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland 27 Apr, 2016)Google Scholar
  6. Ravindra K (2017) Tackling India’s air pollution—policy forum. Policy Forum. The Asia and the Pacific Policy Society, The Australian National University, (accessed 19 Mar, 2018)
  7. Ravindra, K., Mor S (2013) Water quality in India: issues and challenges. Water for health: healthy water, healthy life, Gulab Publisher, New Delhi and Basera Verlag, Germany. pp 256-261Google Scholar
  8. Ravindra K, Sidhu MK, Mor S, John S, & Pyne S (2015). Air pollution in India: Bridging the gap between science and policy. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste 20(4): A4015003Google Scholar
  9. Sidhu MK, Ravindra K, Mor S, John S (2017) Household air pollution from various types of rural kitchens and its exposure assessment. Sci Total Environ 586:419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith KR (2017a) The Indian LPG programmes: globally pioneering initiatives. In: Ganguly A, Debroy B (eds) The Modi years, vol 3. Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee Research Foundation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  11. Smith KR (2017b) Why both gas and biomass are needed today to address the solid fuel cooking problem in India: a challenge to the biomass stove community. Energy Sustain Dev 38:102–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Emergency Fund) and World Health Orgnization (WHO) (2015) Progress on sanitation and drinking-water: 2015 update and MDG assessment. (accessed 27 Apr, 2016)
  13. United Nation Sustainable Development Goals, UN SDG, (2015) 27 Apr, 2016)
  14. Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, Bertozzi-Villa A, Biryukov S, Bolliger I et al (2015) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet 386(9995):743–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. World Health Organization, WHO (2014) Burden of disease from household air pollution for 2012. (accessed April 27, 2016)
  16. World Health Organization, WHO (2015) Global Health Observatory (GHO) data. (accessed March 28, 2018)
  17. World Health Orgnization, WHO (2016) Global health estimates and world health statistics. (accessed Jan 13, 2016)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public HealthPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)ChandigarhIndia
  2. 2.School of Public HealthUniversity of California BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations