Abstract
Iran should pay special attention to its excessive consumption of energy and air pollution due to the limited availability of water resources. This study explores the effects of the consumption of energy and water resources on air pollution in Iran from 1971 to 2014. It utilizes the non-linear autoregressive distributed lag approach to establish a robust relationship between the variables which show that both long- and short-run coefficients are asymmetrical. The positive and negative aspects of the long-run coefficients of energy consumption and water resources were found to be 0.19, − 1.63, 0.18, and 2.36, respectively, while only the negative ones were significant for energy consumption. Based on the cumulative effects, it can be established that there are important and significant differences in the responses of air pollution to positive and negative changes in water productivity and energy consumption. In particular, CO2 gas emissions are affected by negative changes in H2O productivity both in terms of the total and the GDP per unit of energy use in Iran. In regard to short-run results, considerable asymmetric effects occur on all the variables for CO2 emissions. Based on the results obtained, some recommendations are presented, which policymakers can adopt in efforts to address the issues of pollution and consumption.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
US Energy Information Administration
Middle East and North Africa
Middle East and North Africa region
Greenhouse gas
Gulf Cooperation Council countries
Environmental Kuznets Curve
Association of South East Asian Nations
Foreign direct investment
Asymmetric error correction model
The variable used in this study as an index of energy consumption is \( \frac{\mathrm{GDP}}{\mathrm{unit}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{Eenergy}\ \mathrm{use}} \), and our results illustrate that it has an inverse relationship with CO2 gas emissions. It can be concluded that if GDPENRG decreases, CO2 gas emissions would increase. It means that increases in the denominator of the fraction, which is the unit of energy use, causes the fraction to become smaller. Based on the literature review, CO2 gas emissions increase too. In the study by Cole and Neumayer (2004), energy intensity is inverse of GDP per unit of energy use (Economics 2013) was used as an index of energy consumption and the result of their study showed that energy intensity and CO2 gas emissions have a direct relationship. Our results are confirmed by these studies. This is the reason for the contradiction in air pollution and consumption of energy in our results compared to previous studies.
Abbreviations
- NARDL:
-
Non-linear autoregressive distributed lag
- AECM:
-
Asymmetric error correction model
References
Ahmad N, Du L (2017) Effects of energy production and CO2 emissions on economic growth in Iran: ARDL approach. Energy 123:521–537
Akhmat G, Zaman K, Shukui T, Sajjad F, Khan MA, Khan MZ (2014) The challenges of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution through energy sources: evidence from a panel of developed countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(12):7425–7435
Balke NS, Fomby TB (1997) Threshold cointegration. Int Econ Rev 38:627–645
Bhattacharya M, Churchill SA, Paramati SR (2017) The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renew Energy 111:157–167
Blanco J, Malato S, Fernández-Ibañez P, Alarcón D, Gernjak W, Maldonado M (2009) Review of feasible solar energy applications to water processes. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(6):1437–1445
Bozkurt C, Akan Y (2014) Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: the Turkish case. Int J Energy Econ Policy 4(3):484
Cole MA, Neumayer E (2004) Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Popul Environ 26(1):5–21
Compain P (2012) Solar energy for water desalination. Proc Eng 46:220–227
Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366a):427–431
EA (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions of water supply and demand management options. Retrieved from www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Economics V (2013) Energy efficiency and economic growth: report prepared for the climate institute. Vivid Economics, London
EIA (n.d.) U.S. Energy information administration retrieved from https://www.eia.gov
EPA (2013) Global greenhouse gas emissions data. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/global.html
Fogden J, Wood G (2009) Access to safe drinking water and its impact on global economic growth. HaloSource Inc., Bothell
Granger, C., & Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden cointegration. University of California San Diego. Economics Working Paper Series, 2
Hardin E, AghaKouchak A, Qomi M, Madani K, Tarroja B, Zhou Y, Samuelsen S (2017) California drought increases CO2 footprint of energy. Sustain Cities Soc 28:450–452
Heidari H, Katircioğlu ST, Saeidpour L (2015) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:785–791
Hodrick RJ, Prescott EC (1997) Postwar US business cycles: an empirical investigation. J Money, Credit, Bank (1):16
IWMI (2016). International Water Management Institute. Retrieved from www.iwmi.cgiar.org
Kalogirou S (1997) Survey of solar desalination systems and system selection. Energy 22(1):69–81
Kapetanios G, Shin Y, Snell A (2006) Testing for cointegration in nonlinear smooth transition error correction models. Econometric Theory 22(2):279–303
Karagiannis IC, Soldatos PG (2008) Water desalination cost literature: review and assessment. Desalination 223(1–3):448–456
Khan MM, Zaman K, Irfan D, Awan U, Ali G, Kyophilavong P, Naseem I (2016) Triangular relationship among energy consumption, air pollution and water resources in Pakistan. J Clean Prod 112:1375–1385
Koroneos C, Dompros A, Roumbas G (2007) Renewable energy driven desalination systems modelling. J Clean Prod 15(5):449–464
Lotfalipour MR, Falahi MA, Ashena M (2010) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuels consumption in Iran. Energy 35(12):5115–5120
Massarrat, M. (2012) Energy scenario for Iran. BBC
MEI (2017). Ministry of Energy of Iran Retrieved from www.moe.gov.ir
Mirzaei M, Bekri M (2017) Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Iran, 2025. Environ Res 154:345–351
Motevallian S, Tabesh M (2011) Sustainable development of urban water supply and distribution systems in Iran: challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the international conference on water & wastewater
Omay T, Hasanov M, Ucar N (2014) Energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from nonlinear panel cointegration and causality tests. Прикладная эконометрика (2 (34))
Omri A (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: evidence from simultaneous equations models. Energy Econ 40:657–664
Pesaran MH, Shin Y (1998) An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometric Soc Monographs 31:371–413
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326
Phillips PC, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346
Psaradakis Z, Sola M, Spagnolo F (2004) On Markov error-correction models, with an application to stock prices and dividends. J Appl Econ 19(1):69–88
Rafindadi AA (2015a) Could the expanding economic growth and trade openness of the United Kingdom pose a threat to its existing energy predicaments? Int J Energy Econ Policy 5(1):121
Rafindadi AA (2015b) Econometric prediction on the effects of financial development and trade openness on the German energy consumption: a startling revelation from the data set. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5(1):182
Rafindadi AA (2016a) Does the need for economic growth influence energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Nigeria? Evidence from the innovation accounting test. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:1209–1225
Rafindadi AA (2016b) Revisiting the concept of environmental Kuznets curve in period of energy disaster and deteriorating income: empirical evidence from Japan. Energy Policy 94:274–284
Rafindadi AA, Ilhan O (2017) Dynamic effects of financial development, trade openness and economic growth on energy consumption: evidence from South Africa
Rafindadi AA, Muye IM, Kaita RA (2018) The effects of FDI and energy consumption on environmental pollution in predominantly resource-based economies of the GCC. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 25:126–137
Rafindadi AA, Ozturk I (2015) Natural gas consumption and economic growth nexus: is the 10th Malaysian plan attainable within the limits of its resource? Renew Sust Energ Rev 49:1221–1232
Rafindadi AA, Ozturk I (2016) Effects of financial development, economic growth and trade on electricity consumption: evidence from post-Fukushima Japan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:1073–1084
Rafindadi AA, Ozturk I (2017) Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: evidence from combined cointegration test. Renew Sust Energ Rev 75:1130–1141
Rafindadi AA, Yusof Z (2015) Do the dynamics of financial development spur economic growth in Nigeria’s contemporal growth struggle? A fact beyond the figures. Qual Quant 49(1):365–384
Rafindadi AA, Yusof Z, Zaman K, Kyophilavong P, Akhmat G (2014) The relationship between air pollution, fossil fuel energy consumption, and water resources in the panel of selected Asia-Pacific countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(19):11395–11400
Roostaei N (2004) River basin challenges and management in Iran: Ministry of Environment. Deputy of Human Environment Tehran
Saidi K, Hammami S (2015) The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emissions on economic growth: fresh evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equations models. Sustainable Cities Soc 14:178–186
Salahuddin M, Gow J (2014) Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in gulf cooperation council countries. Energy 73:44–58
Sari R, Soytas U (2004) Disaggregate energy consumption, employment and income in Turkey. Energy Econ 26(3):335–344
Schorderet Y (2003) Asymmetric cointegration: Université de Genève/Faculté des sciences économiques et sociales
Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464
SCI (2017) Statistical Center of Iran. Retrieved from https://www.amar.org.ir
Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Sbia R, Bibi S (2015) Does energy intensity contribute to CO2 emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecol Indic 50:215–224
Shang Y, Hei P, Lu S, Shang L, Li X, Wei Y, Gong J (2018) China’s energy-water nexus: assessing water conservation synergies of the total coal consumption cap strategy until 2050. Appl Energy 210:643–660
Sharzehei G, Haghanie M (2010) Study of the relationship between carbon emission and national income with an emphasis on the role of energy consumption. J Econ Res (Persian) 44:16
Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281–314): Springer
Singh VP, Khedun CP, Mishra AK (2014) Water, environment, energy, and population growth: implications for water sustainability under climate change. J Hydrol Eng 19(4):667–673
UN (2016) United Nations. Retrieved from www.un.org/en/
WorldBank (2017) International development, poverty, & sustainability. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/
WRI (2016) World Resources Institute. Retrieved from www.wri.org
Život E, Andrews D (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):251–270
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to place on record their sincerest thanks to the Editor-in-Chief. We would also like to express our gratitude to the three anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions which tremendously improved the quality of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ashouri, M.J., Rafei, M. Analysis of asymmetries in air pollution with water resources, and energy consumption in Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 17590–17601 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1825-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1825-5