Abstract
Seawater intrusion monitoring is quite different from the conventional monitoring of groundwater pollution. In this study, a new optimization method for the seawater intrusion monitoring scheme in the transitional zone was proposed. The objective of optimization was to maximize effective information monitored. The structural similarity index method (SSIM) of the image quality assessment was innovatively used to establish a mathematical expression for the effective monitored information, and an optimization model was constructed based on this. Taken the Longkou city of China as the study area, a numerical simulation model of variable density groundwater was constructed. The Monte Carlo method was used to consider the influence of the sensitivity parameters uncertainty on the monitoring scheme design. To avoid repeatedly calling of simulation models in the process of Monte Carlo experiments, a surrogate model was constructed by using the kernel extreme learning machine (KELM). Finally, the optimization model was solved by the genetic algorithm to obtain the optimal monitoring scheme. The results showed that the input-output relationship of the numerical simulation model for variable-density groundwater can be well approximated by the KELM surrogate model. The monitoring scheme optimized by the above method can well reflect the real state of seawater intrusion. This study expands the method on the scheme designs for seawater intrusion monitoring.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayvaz MT, Elçi A (2018) Identification of the optimum groundwater quality monitoring network using a genetic algorithm based optimization approach. J Hydrol 563:1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.006
Bierkens MFP (2006) Designing a monitoring network for detecting groundwater pollution with stochastic simulation and a cost mode. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 20(5):335–351
Bode F, Ferré T, Zigelli N, Emmert M, Nowak W (2018) Reconnecting stochastic methods with hydrogeological applications: a utilitarian uncertainty analysis and risk assessment approach for the design of optimal monitoring networks. Water Resour Res 54(3):2270–2287. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020919
Datta B, Chakrabarty D, Dhar A (2009) Optimal dynamic monitoring network design and identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources. Water Resour Manag 23(10):2031–2049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9368-z
Dokou Z, Pinder GF (2009) Optimal search strategy for the definition of a DNAPL source. J Hydrol 376(3–4):542–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.062
Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CK (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70(1–3):489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126
Huang GB (2014) An insight into extreme learning machines: random neurons, random features and kernels. Cogn Comput 6(3):376–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9255-2
Jiang X, Lu W, Hou Z et al (2015) Ensemble of surrogates-based optimization for identifying an optimal surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation strategy at heterogeneous DNAPL-contaminated sites. Comput Geosci 84:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.08.003
Kollat JB, Reed PM (2007) A computational scaling analysis of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in long-term groundwater monitoring applications. Adv Water Resour 30(3):408–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.05.009
Kumari K, Jain S, Dhar A (2019) Computationally efficient approach for identification of fuzzy dynamic groundwater sampling network. Environ Monit Assess 191(5):310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7467-3
Luo Q, Wu J, Yang Y et al (2016) Multi-objective optimization of long-term groundwater monitoring network design using a probabilistic Pareto genetic algorithm under uncertainty. J Hydrol 534:352–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.009
Masoumi F, Kerachian R (2010) Optimal redesign of groundwater quality monitoring networks: a case study. Environ Monit Assess 161(1–4):247–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0742-3
Melloul AJ, Goldenberg LC (1997) Monitoring of seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers: basics and local concerns. J Environ Manage 51(1):73–86. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0136
Meyer PD, Valocchi AJ, Eheart JW (1994) Monitoring network design to provide initial detection of groundwater contamination. Water Resour Res 30(9):2647–2659. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00872
Montas HJ, Mohtar RH, Hassan AE et al (2000) Heuristic space–time design of monitoring wells for contaminant plume characterization in stochastic flow fields. J Contam Hydrol 43(3–4):271–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(99)00108-4
Narany TS, Ramli MF, Fakharian K et al (2015) Multi-objective based approach for groundwater quality monitoring network optimization. Water Resour Manag 29(14):5141–5156
Ohmer M, Liesch T, Goldscheider N (2019) On the optimal spatial design for groundwater level monitoring networks. Water Resour Res 55(11):9454–9473. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025728
Reed PM, Hadka D, Herman JD et al (2013) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in water resources: the past, present, and future. Adv Water Resour 51:438–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.005
Roy DK, Datta B (2019) Adaptive management of coastal aquifers using entropy-set pair analysis–based three-dimensional sequential monitoring network design. J Hydrol Eng 24(3):04018072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001765
Song J, Yang Y, Wu J et al (2018) Adaptive surrogate model based multiobjective optimization for coastal aquifer management. J Hydrol 561:98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.063
Sreekanth J, Datta B (2013) Design of an optimal compliance monitoring network and feedback information for adaptive management of saltwater intrusion in coastal aquifers. J Water Resour Plan Manage-ASCE 140(10):04014026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000406
Tryby ME, Propato M, Ranjithan SR (2010) Monitoring design for source identification in water distribution systems. J Water Resour Plan Manage-ASCE 136(6):637–646. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000080
Wagner BJ (1995) Recent advances in simulation-optimization groundwater management modeling. Rev Geophys 33(S2):1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1029/95RG00394
Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR et al (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861
Wu J, Zheng C, Chien CC et al (2006) A comparative study of Monte Carlo simple genetic algorithm and noisy genetic algorithm for cost-effective sampling network design under uncertainty. Adv Water Resour 29(6):899–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.005
Zhang Y, Pinder GF, Herrera GS (2005) Least cost design of groundwater quality monitoring networks. Water Resour Res 41(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003936
Zhang S, Qiang J, Liu H, Li Y (2020) Optimization design of groundwater pollution monitoring scheme and inverse identification of pollution source parameters using Bayes’ theorem. Water Air Soil Pollut 231(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4369-5
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2016YFC0402800), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No.41672232), and the Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, Y., Lu, W., Miao, T. et al. Optimum Design of a Seawater Intrusion Monitoring Scheme Based on the Image Quality Assessment Method. Water Resour Manage 34, 2485–2502 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02565-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02565-w