Mathematical Modeling on Mobility and Spreading of BTEX in a Discretely Fractured Aquifer System Under the Coupled Effect of Dissolution, Sorption, and Biodegradation

Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a numerical model to investigate the migration of BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene) within a fractured aquifer system at the scale of a single fracture under the coupled effect of various transport processes such as dissolution, sorption, biodegradation. The developed model also considers the influence of equilibrium- and kinetic-controlled sorption scenarios on BTEX transport. Further, the transport characteristics of dissolved BTEX within the fracture–matrix system (FMS) are obtained by carrying out the spatial moment analysis on the concentration profiles simulated. In this study, the spatial moment analysis is conducted to estimate the following transport characteristics of dissolved BTEX: (a) velocity within the fracture, (b) dispersion coefficient within the fracture, (c) dissolved mass within the matrix. In order to investigate the sensitivity of various input parameters, two sensitivity indices are computed based on the variation in the velocity of dissolved BTEX constituent within the fracture (SI_vel) and on the variation in the dissolved mass of BTEX constituents within the matrix (SI_mat). Results from the present simulation study suggest that the sorption and biodegradation reactions influence the concentration distribution of highly soluble BTEX constituents (benzene, toluene) within the FMS significantly. The influence of biodegradation on the migration of BTEX within the FMS is found to be more when it co-occurs with the sorption reaction. The effect of sorption and biodegradation reactions on the mobility and dispersion coefficient of dissolved BTEX constituents within the FMS is found to be significant during the early simulation period.

Keywords

Numerical modeling BTEX Fracture–matrix system (FMS) Multi-component dissolution Sorption 

Supplementary material

11242_2018_1049_MOESM1_ESM.docx (268 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 267 kb)

References

  1. Arnon, A., Adar, E., Ronen, Z., Yakirevich, A., Nativ, R.: Impact of microbial activity on the hydraulic properties of fractured chalk. J. Contam. Hydrol. 76, 315–336 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atteia, O., Guillot, C.: Factors controlling BTEX and chlorinated solvents plume length under natural attenuation conditions. J. Contam. Hydrol. 90, 81–104 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bear, J., Tsang, C.F., De Marsily, G.: Flow and Contaminant Transport in Fractured Rock. Academic Press Inc., San Diego (2012)Google Scholar
  4. Bekins, B.A., Cozzarelli, I.M., Cozzarelli, I.M., Godsy, E.M., Warren, E., Essaid, H.I., Tuccillo, M.E.: Progression of natural attenuation processes at a crude oil spill site: II. Controls on spatial distribution of microbial populations. J. Contam. Hydrol. 3–4, 387–406 (2001a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekins, B.A., Rittmann, B.E., MacDonald, J.A.: Natural attenuation strategy for groundwater cleanup focuses on demonstrating cause and effect. EOS Trans. AGU 53, 57–58 (2001b)Google Scholar
  6. Berkowitz, B., Zhou, J.: Reactive solute transport in a single fracture. Water Resour. Res. 4, 901–913 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodin, J., Delay, F., de Marsily, G.: Solute transport in fissured aquifers: 1. Fundamental mechanisms. Hydrogeol. J. 11, 418–433 (2003a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bodin, J., Delay, F., de Marsily, G.: Solute transport in a single fracture with negligible matrix permeability: 2. Mathematical formalism. Hydrogeol. J. 11, 434–454 (2003b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley, P.M., Journey, C.A., Kirshtein, J.D.: Enhanced dichloroethene biodegradation in fractured rock under biostimulated and bioaugmented conditions. Remed. J. 2, 21–32 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambon, J.C., Broholm, M.M., Binning, P.J., Bjerg, P.L.: Modeling multi-component transport and enhanced anaerobic dechlorination processes in a single fracture–clay matrix system. J. Contam. Hydrol. 112, 77–90 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapelle, F.H., Widdowson, M.A., Brauner, J.S., Mendez, E., Casey, C.C.: Methodology for Estimating Times of Remediation Associated with Monitored Natural Attenuation. United States Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report. 03-4057 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. Cherubini, C., Pastore, N., Giasi, C.I., Allegretti, N.M.: Laboratory experimental investigation of heat transport in fractured media. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 24, 23–42 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Declercq, I., Cappuyns, V., Duclos, Y.: Monitored natural attenuation (MNA) of contaminated soils: state of the art in Europe—a critical evaluation. Sci. Total Environ. 1, 393–405 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Detwiler, R.L., Rajaram, H., Glass, R.J.: Nonaqueous-phase-liquid dissolution in variable-aperture fractures: development of a depth-averaged computational model with comparison to a physical experiment. Water Resour. Res. 37(12), 3115–3129 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Detwiler, R.L., Rajaram, H., Glass, R.J.: Interphase mass transfer in variable aperture fractures: controlling parameters and proposed constitutive relationships. Water Resour. Res. 45, W08436 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickson, S.E., Thomson, N.R.: Dissolution of entrapped DNAPLs in variable aperture fractures: experimental data and empirical model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37(18), 4128–4137 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Essaid, H.I., Cozzarelli, M.I., Eganhouse, P.R., Herkelrath, W.N., Belkins, B.A., Delin, G.N.: Inverse Modeling of BTEX dissolution and biodegradation at the Bemidgi, M-N crude-oil spill site. J. Contam. Hydrol. 67, 269–299 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faybishenko, B., Witherspoon, P., Bodvarsson, G.: Emerging issues in fractured-rock flow and transport investigations: introduction and overview. Dyn Fluids Transp Fract Rocks 162, 1–11 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. Geller, G.T., Holman, H.Y., Su, G., Conrad, M.E., Pruess, K., Hunter-Cevera, J.C.: Flow dynamics and potential for biodegradation of organic contaminants in fractured rock vadose zones. J. Contam. Hydrol. 1, 63–90 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goltz, M.N., Roberts, P.V.: Using the method of moments to analyze three-dimensional diffusion-limited solute transport from temporal and spatial perspectives. Water Resour. Res. 23(8), 1575–1585 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grisak, G.E., Pickens, J.F., Cherry, J.A.: Solute transport through fractured media 2. The column study of fractured till. Water Resour. Res. 4, 731–739 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen, S.K., Kueper, B.H.: A new model for coupled multicomponent NAPL dissolution and aqueous-phase transport, with application to creosote dissolution in discrete fractures. Water Resour. Res. 50, 58–70 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hardisty, P.E., Wheater, H., Johnston, P.M., Dabrowski, T.L.: Mobility of LNAPL in fractured sedimentary rocks: implications for remediation. In: Proceedings API/NGWA Conference on Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Groundwater, Houston (1994)Google Scholar
  24. Hölttä, P., Hakanen, M., Hautojärvi, A., Timonen, J., Väätäinen, K.: The effects of matrix diffusion on radionuclide migration in rock column experiments. J. Contam. Hydrol. 21, 1–4 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobson, G.: Pollution of a fractured rock aquifer by petrol a case study. BMR J. Aust. Geol. Geophys. 8, 313–322 (1983)Google Scholar
  26. Jørgensen, P.R., Helstrup, T., Urup, J., Seifert, D.: Modeling of non-reactive solute transport in fractured clayey till during variable flow rate and time. J. Contam. Hydrol. 68(3–4), 193–216 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joshi, N., Ojha, C.S.P., Sharma, P.K.: A nonequilibrium model for reactive contaminant transport through fractured porous media: model development and semi analytical solution. Water Resour. Res. 48, W10511 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Joshi, N., Ojha, C.S.P., Sharma, P.K., Madramootoo, C.A.: Application of nonequilibrium fracture matrix model in simulating reactive contaminant transport through fractured porous media. Water Resour. Res. 51, 390–408 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kischinhevsky, M., Paes-leme, P.J.: Modelling and numerical simulations of contaminant transport in naturally fractured porous media. Transp. Porous Med. 26, 25 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knorr, B., Maloszewski, P., Krämer, F., Stumpp, C.: Diffusive mass exchange of non-reactive substances in dual-porosity porous systems—a column experiment under saturated conditions. Hydrol. Process. 30(6), 914–926 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolditz, O.: Modelling flow and heat transfer in fractured rocks: dimensional effect of matrix heat diffusion. Geothermics 24(3), 421–437 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krooss, B.M., Leythaeuser, D.: Experimental measurements of the diffusion parameters of light hydrocarbons in water-saturated sedimentary rocks—ll. Results Geochem. Signif. Org. Geochem. 2, 91–108 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lu, G., Clement, P.T., Zheng, C., Wiedemeier, H.T.: Natural attenuation of BTEX compounds: model development and field-scale applications. Ground Water 37, 707–717 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lundegard, P.D., Johnson, P.C.: Source zone natural attenuation at petroleum hydrocarbon spill sites—II: application to a former oil field. Groundw Monit Remed. 4, 93–106 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maloszewski, P., Zuber, A.: Mathematical modeling of tracer behavior in short-term experiments in fissured rocks. Water Resour. Res. 7, 1517–1528 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Molson, J.W., Frind, E.O., van Stempvoort, D.R., Lesage, S.: Humic acid-enhanced remediation of an emplaced diesel source in groundwater 2: numerical model development and application. J. Contam. Hydrol. 54, 277–305 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mulligan, C.N., Yong, R.N.: Natural attenuation of contaminated soils. Environ. Int. 4, 587–601 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mutch, R.D., Scott, J.I., Wilson, D.J.: Cleanup of fractured rock aquifers: implications of matrix diffusion. Environ. Monit. Assess. 24, 45 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Natarajan, N., Suresh Kumar, G.: Numerical modeling and spatial moment analysis of thermal fronts in a coupled fracture-skin-matrix system. Geotech. Geolog. Eng. 29(4), 477–491 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neretnieks, I.: Diffusion in the rock matrix: an important factor in radionuclide retardation? J. Geophys. Res. 85, 4379–4397 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neretnieks, I., Eriksen, T., Tahtimen, P.: Tracer movement in a single fissure in granite rock: some experimental results and their interpretation. Water Resour. Res. 4, 849–858 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ordencrantz, J.E., Valocchi, A.J., Rittman, B.E.: Modeling the interaction of sorption and biodegrdation on transport in groundwater in situ bioremediation systems; In: Proceedings of the Groundwater Modeling Conference, Golden Colorado (1993)Google Scholar
  43. Prommer, H., Barry, D.A., Davis, G.B.: A one-dimensional reactive multi component transport model for biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Environ. Modell. Softw. 14, 213–223 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Renu, V., Suresh Kumar, G.: Numerical modeling and spatial moment analysis of solute mobility and spreading in a coupled fracture-skin-matrix system. Geotech. Geolog. Eng. 30, 1289–1302 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Renu, V., Suresh Kumar, G.: Numerical modeling on benzene dissolution into groundwater and transport of dissolved benzene in a saturated fracture–matrix system. Environ. Process. 3(4), 781–802 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Renu, V., Suresh Kumar, G.: Benzene dissolution and transport in a saturated sinusoidal fracture with non-uniform flow: numerical investigation and sensitivity analysis. Environ. Process. 4(3), 587–601 (2017a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Renu, V., Suresh Kumar, G.: Multi-component transport of BTX in a discretely fractured aquifer with fracture–skin: numerical investigation and sensitivity analysis. Environ. Earth Sci. 76, 619 (2017b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sekhar, M., Suresh Kumar, G.: Modeling transport of linearly sorbing solutes in a single fracture: asymptotic behavior of solute velocity and dispersivity. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 24(1), 183–201 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scow, K.M., Hicks, K.A.: Natural attenuation and enhanced bioremediation of organic contaminants in groundwater. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 3, 246–253 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sharma, P., Sekhar, M., Srivastava, R., Ojha, C.: Temporal moments for reactive transport through fractured impermeable/permeable formations. J. Hydrol. Eng. 12, 1302–1314 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Suresh Kumar, G.: Mathematical modeling of groundwater flow and solute transport in saturated fractured rock using a dual-porosity approach. J. Hydrol. Eng. 19(12), 04014033 (2014a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suresh Kumar, G.: Mathematical modelling on transport of petroleum hydrocarbons in saturated fractured rocks. Sadhana 39(5), 1119–1139 (2014b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tang, D.H., Frind, E.O., Sudicky, E.A.: Contaminant transport in fractured porous media: analytical solutions for a single fracture. Water Resour. Res. 17, 555–564 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tsang, C., Neretneiks, I.: Flow channeling in heterogeneous fractured rocks. Rev. Geophys. 36, 275–298 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. U.S.EPA: A citizen’s guide to natural attenuation. EPA 542-F-96-015. http://www.epa.gov/swertio1/download/remed/citguide/natural.html (1996)
  56. Veettil, R.T., Suresh Kumar, G.: Numerical modeling on the sensitivity of directional dependent interface heat transfer on thermal transport in a coupled fracture–matrix system. Geosci. J. 20(5), 639–647 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu, Y., Ye, M., Sudicky, E.A.: Fracture-flow-enhanced matrix diffusion in solute transport through fractured porous media. Transp. Porous Med. 81, 21–34 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang, Z., Niemi, A., Fagerlund, F., Illangasekare, T., Detwiler, R.L.: Dissolution of dense non-aqueous phase liquids in vertical fractures: effect of finger residuals and dead-end pools. J. Contam. Hydrol. 149, 88–99 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zou, L., Jing, L., Cvetkovic, V.: Modeling of solute transport in a 3d rough-walled fracture–matrix system. Transp. Porous Med. 116, 1005–1029 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ocean EngineeringIIT-MadrasChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Petroleum Engineering Program, Department of Ocean EngineeringIIT-MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations