Abstract
This article examines how the existence of unpredictability should influence the quest to promote distributive justice in education. First, the article briefly discusses resource allocation in education finance policy and its relationships with existing philosophical theories of distributive justice. It then explains why unpredictability comes into play in education and how this endangers the achievements of distributive justice. It is argued that unpredictability poses a real challenge to enhancing educational justice. Second, the article examines the common policy conception that educational justice can best be promoted by reducing unpredictability through means of increased control. It is maintained that the costs of this solution exceed its benefits. Finally, the article offers alternative routes for dealing with unpredictability in educational resource allocations. It is argued that we have good reasons, both normative and practical, to embrace a new approach for furthering distributive justice in education that takes into account the complexity of the educational system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baez, B. 2006. Merit and difference. Teachers College Record 108: 996–1016.
Barro, R.J. 1986. Recent developments in the theory of rules versus discretion. The Economic Journal 96: 23–37.
BenDavid-Hadar, I., and A. Ziderman. 2011. A new model for equitable and efficient resource allocation to schools: The Israeli case. Education Economics 19(4): 341–362.
Berne, R., and L. Stiefel. 1999. Concepts of school finance equity: 1970 to the present. In Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives, ed. H.F. Ladd, R. Chalk, and J.S. Hansen, 7–33. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Biesta, G.J. 2004. Education, accountability, and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained? Educational Theory 54(3): 233–250.
Biesta, G.J. 2015. Beautiful risk of education. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Brighouse, H. 2010. Educational equality and school reform. In Educational equality, ed. G. Haydon, 15–70. London: Continuum.
Brighouse, H., and A. Swift. 2008. Putting educational equality in its place. Education Finance and Policy 3(4): 444–466.
Cairney, P. 2012. Complexity theory in political science and public policy. Political Studies Review 10(3): 346–358.
Colander, D., and R. Kupers. 2014. Complexity and the art of public policy: Solving society’s problems from the bottom up. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Coleman, J.S. 1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Oxford, England: U. S. Department of Helath, Education.
Cziko, G.A. 1989. Unpredictability and indeterminism in human behavior: Arguments and implications for educational research. Educational Researcher 18(3): 17–25.
D’agnese, V. 2017. The essential uncertainty of thinking: Education and subject in John Dewey. Journal of Philosophy of Education 51(1): 73–88.
Davis, A. 1995. Criterion-referenced assessment and the development of knowledge and understanding. Journal of Philosophy of Education 29(1): 3–21.
Davis, B., and D. Sumara. 2006. Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching and research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dewey, J. 2004. Democracy and education. New York: Dover Publications.
Eisner, E. 1983. Educational objectives: Help or hindrance? American Journal of Education 91(4): 549–560.
Ellison, S. 2012. Re-thinking the concept of “accountability” in the popular discourse of education policy. Journal of Thought 47(2): 19–41.
Fazekas, M. 2012. School funding formulas: Review of main characteristics and impacts. OECD education working papers no. 74, OECD Publishing.
Fleurbaey, M., and V. Peragine. 2013. Ex ante versus ex post equality of opportunity. Economica 80(317): 118–130.
Geyer, R., and S. Rihani. 2010. Complexity and public policy: A new approach to twenty-first century politics, policy and society. New York: Routledge.
Hall, M.A. 1994. The problems with rule-based rationing. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19(4): 315–332.
Howe, K.R. 1989. In defense of outcomes-based conceptions of equal educational opportunity. Educational Theory 39(4): 317–336.
Jencks, C. 1988. Whom must we treat equally for educational opportunity to be equal? Ethics 98(3): 518–533.
Ladd, H.F. 2008. Reflections on equity, adequacy, and weighted student funding. Education Finance and Policy 3(4): 402–423.
Meuret, D. 2002. Scool equity as a matter of justice. In In pursit of equity in education, ed. W. Hutmacher, C.D. Cochrane, and N. Bottani, 93–111. Dordrecht: Springer.
Molander, A., H. Grimen, and E.O. Eriksen. 2012. Professional discretion and accountability in the welfare state. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29(3): 214–230.
Morrison, K. 2008. Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40: 19–34.
Myrdal, G. 1939. Monetary equilibrium. London: William Hodge & Company.
Odden, A., and L. Picus. 1992. School finance: A policy perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Radford, M. 2008. Prediction, control and the challenge to complexity. Oxford Review of Education 34(5): 505–520.
Robeyns, I. 2008. Ideal theory in theory and practice. Social Theory and Practice 34(3): 341–362.
Rodriguez, G.M., and R.A. Rolle. 2013. Why social justice framing of school finance—Why not. In To what ends and by what means: The social justice implications of contemporary school finance theory and policy, ed. G.M. Rodriguez and R.A. Rolle, 1–8. New York: Routledge.
Ross, K.N., and R. Levacic. 1999. Needs-based resource allocation in education via formula funding of schools. Paris: UNESCO.
Satz, D. 2007. Equality, adequacy, and education for citizenship. Ethics 117(4): 623–648.
Schlag, P. 1985. Rules and standards. UCLA Law Review 33: 379–430.
Schneider, C.E. 1995. Discretion and rules—A lawyer’s view. In The uses of discretion, ed. K. Hawkins, 47–88. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Schramme, T. 2014. Disatvantage and equal opportunity in education: A noncomparative perspective. Social Philosophy and Policy 31: 135–149.
Semetsky, I. 2008. On the creative logic of education, or: Re-reading Dewey through the lens of complexity science. Educational Philosophy and Theory 40(1): 83–95.
Sen, A. 2006. What do we want from a theory of justice? The Journal of Philosophy 103(5): 215–238.
Swift, A. 2008. The value of philosophy in nonideal circumstances. Social Theory and Practice 34(3): 363–387.
Thompson, W.C. 2016. Rethinking discussions of justice in educational research: Formative justice, educational liberalism, and beyond. Teachers College Record 118: 10.
Valentini, L. 2012. Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: A conceptual map. Philosophy Compass 7.9: 654–664.
Warnick, B.R. 2015. Taming the conflict over educational equality. Journal of Applied Philosophy 32(1): 50–66.
White, J. 1994. The dishwasher’s child: Education and the end of egalitarianism. Journal of Philosophy of Education 28(2): 173–182.
White, J. 1999. Thinking about assessment. Journal of Philosophy of Education 32(2): 201–211.
Winch, C., and J. Gingell. 1996. Educational assessment: Reply to Andrew Davis. Journal of Philosophy of Education 30(3): 377–388.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the anonymous referees of this article for their insightful comments. They have helped me to make this article clearer and hopefully more convincing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gilead, T. Promoting Distributive Justice in Education and the Challenge of Unpredictability. Stud Philos Educ 38, 439–451 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09655-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09655-2