Skip to main content

Informal Home Education: Philosophical Aspirations put into Practice

Abstract

Informal home education occurs without much that is generally considered essential for formal education—including curriculum, learning plans, assessments, age related targets or planned and deliberate teaching. Our research into families conducting this kind of education enables us to consider learning away from such imposed structures and to explore how children go about learning for themselves within the context of their own socio-cultural setting. In this paper we consider what and how children learn when no educational agenda is arranged for them and we link this manner of learning to the Deweyan ideas of learning as transactional and learning-in-context. We also use our empirical evidence to explore the notion of ZPD with regard to informal learning and to consider how children, without specific guidance, go about charting a course of learning through the ZPD. We consider the quality of informal learning particularly with regard to the educational aim of developing reflective and critical thinking, showing how these are integral to informal learning. We suggest that a much wider conception of what learning is and how it happens is needed, away from the confines of formal educational structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Our interest here lies not with judging the desirability of competing values, ethics and world views as they may be handed on to children within families. Whilst these matters may be considered integral to serious debates about mainstream education they stand on different ground in home education, abutting as they do with questions of civil liberties and the integrity of family life. In any case, this lies outside the scope of this paper in which we concentrate on the acquisition of knowledge, of certain capabilities and understandings.

References

  1. Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biesta, G. J. J. (2009). Pragmatism’s contribution to understanding learning-in-context. In R. G. Edwards, G. J. J. Biesta, & M. Thorpe (Eds.), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching: Communities, activities and networks (pp. 61–73). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, K. (1998). Education, culture and critical thinking. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in the schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cole, M. (1998). Culture in development. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkener, & K. Littleton (Eds.), Cultural worlds of early childhood (pp. 11–33). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eberhardt, N. (1979). Towards a cognitive approach to the study of culture acquisition. Washington, DC: Educational Resources Information Centre. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED172908).

  7. Gauvain, M. (2001). The social context of cognitive development. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G. J. J., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ireson, J., & Blay, J. (1999). Constructing activity: Participation by adults and children. Learning and Instruction, 9(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Lines, P. M. (2001). Homeschooling. Eric Digest 151, September 2001. Retrieved February 18, 2011 from http://www.discovery.org/a/1068.

  12. McCowan, T. (2009). A ‘seamless enactment’ of citizenship education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meighan, R. (1995). Home-based education effectiveness research and some of its implications. Educational Review, 47(3), 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitra, S., Dangwal, R., Chatterjee, S., Jha, S., Bisht, R. S., & Kapur, P. (2005). Acquisition of computer literacy on shared public computers: Children and the “hole in the wall”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(3), 407–426.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Osberg, D. (2009). Enlarging the space of the possible” around what it means to educate and to be educated. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 6(1), iii–x.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Osberg, D., Biesta, G., & Cilliers, P. (2008). From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peim, N., & Flint, K. (2009). Testing times: Questions concerning assessment for school improvement. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(3), 342–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Princiotta, D., & Bielick, S. (2006). Homeschooling in the United States: 2003 statistical analysis report (NCES 2006–042). Washington, DC: US Department of Education National Center for Educational Statistics.

  19. Rothermel, P. (2004). Home education comparison of home and school educated children on PIPS baseline assessments. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(3), 273–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rothermel, P. (2005). Can we classify motives for home education? Evaluation and Research in Education, 17(2–3), 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Standish, P. (1999). Education without aims? In R. Marples (Ed.), The aims of education (pp. 35–49). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. (1998). The development of affect in infancy and early childhood. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkener, & K. Littleton (Eds.), Cultural worlds of early childhood (pp. 34–47). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas, A. (1992). Individualised teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 18(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thomas, A. (1994). Conversational learning. Oxford Review of Education, 20(1), 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas, A. (1998). Educating children at home. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas, A., & Pattison, H. (2008). How children learn at home. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (1984). Young children learning at home and in school. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trevarthen, C. (1995). The child’s need to learn a culture. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkener, & K. Littleton (Eds.), Cultural worlds of early childhood (pp. 87–100). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ulmer, G. L. (1985). Applied grammatology: Post (e) pedagogy from Jacques Derrida to Joseph Beuys. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

  30. Wood, D. J., Wood, H. A., & Middleton, D. J. (1978). An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 1(2), 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, A., Pattison, H. Informal Home Education: Philosophical Aspirations put into Practice. Stud Philos Educ 32, 141–154 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9299-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Autonomous education
  • Unschooling
  • Transactional
  • Socio-cultural
  • Home education
  • Informal learning
  • Curriculum