Abstract
Using panel data from 102 countries in 1975–2010, this paper explores the dynamic interaction among health, education and growth by applying panel VAR techniques. Empirical findings reveal that the predictive pattern among health, education and economic growth is not stable in the cross section of countries. While health has positive contribution to growth for all countries, education has benefited only higher middle income and high-income OECD countries. Economic growth has predictive power for the components of human development in the high-income OECD countries. Further, econometric evidence reveals that bi-directional relationship between health and education should be supported to reap the benefits of human development on economic growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Suri et al. (2011), both theoretically and empirically, put forward a strong connection between human development and economic growth, provide an evidence for a systematic link between them, and analyze the priorities in building up policy implications. Their findings display that, without an improvement in human development indicators, sustained economic growth is not achievable, and policies to improve human development must complement economic growth oriented policies.
Recently, three way causality between health, education and economic growth have been examined for different countries and time spans by using different proxies for health and education, such as Dahal (2016) for Nepal, Şen et al. (2015) for eight developing countries, Saksena and Deb (2016) for Indian States and Bleakley et al. (2013) for US. Yet, none of them has focused on relationship among health, education and economic growth for 102 countries between 1975 and 2010 by adopting panel VAR approach based on system GMM estimates.
There are a number of causality studies for some countries based on time series techniques. See, for example, Ahmad and French (2011) for Bangladesh; De Meulemeester and Rochat (1995) for Sweden, Australia, UK, France, Japan and Italy; Ljungberg and Nilson (2009) for Sweden; Asterau and Agiomirgianakis (2001) for Greece; and Selfa and Grabowski (2003) for Japan.
Based on the values of their GNI per capita, the World Bank classifies countries into four categories, namely, low-income, lower middle-income, higher middle-income and higher-income. See “Appendix 1” for the classification and the list of the countries.
Even though health expenditure is the widely-used proxy in the literature, this variable is not available for all countries in the period considered.
For the sensitivity of the results, all regressions are carried out by benefiting from different measures of health and education. To proxy for health and education, under five mortality rates and the percentage of population who have completed secondary education have been employed, respectively. But there is no significant change in the results. All calculations are available upon request.
Due to the lack of space, the panel unit root tests are not reported, but they are available upon request.
The robust regression procedure is implemented by STATA via the rreg command.
Using different lag orders do not generate significant changes in the results. All calculations are available upon request.
All system GMM estimates are carried out by the Roodman`s `xtabond2` command in STATA (v.12). The basic weakness in the system GMM estimation is the use of too many instruments leading to misspecification of the model. In this context, to get valid instruments, we have followed the way suggested by Roodman (2006, 2009). First, a high p value of Hansen test is preferred rather than the conventional level of 0.05. Second, the “collapse” option available in STATA v.12 is used to limit the proliferation of instruments.
Due to the heteroscedasticity problem in the one-step model, robust-to-heteroscedasticity variance–covariance estimator is used as (such the Sargan test statistics cannot be presented).
References
Ahmad, N., & French, J. J. (2011). Decomposing the relationship between human capital and GDP: An empirical analysis of Bangladesh. The Journal of Developing Areas, 44, 127–142.
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. R. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.
Arendt, J. N. (2005). Does Education cause better health? A panel data analysis using school reform for identification. Economics of Education Review, 24, 149–160.
Asteriou, D., & Agiomirgianakis, G. M. (2001). Human capital and economic growth time series evidence from Greece. Journal of Policy Modeling, 23, 481–489.
Baldacci, E., Clements, B., Gupta, S., & Cui, Q. (2008). Social spending, human capital, and growth in developing countries. World Development, 36(8), 1317–1341.
Barro, R. (1996). Health, human capital and economic growth. Paper for the Program on Public Policy and Health, Pan American Health Organization and World Health Organization. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization.
Barro, R., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198.
Barro, R., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bills, M., & Klenow, P. J. (2000). Does schooling cause growth? American Economic Review, 90(5), 1184–1208.
Bleakley, H., Costa, D., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2013). Health, Education and Income in the United States, 1820–2000 (p. w19162). Washington: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.
Colantonio, E., Marianacci, R., & Mattoscio, N. (2010). On human capital and economic development: Some results for Africa. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 266–272.
Dahal, G. (2016). The triangular causality among education, health and economic growth: A time series analysis of Nepal. In Proceedings of International Academic Conferences (No. 3606364). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
De Meulemeester, J. L., & Rochat, D. (1995). A causality analysis of the link between higher education and development. Economics of Education Review, 14, 351–361.
Eide, R. E., & Showalter, M. H. (2011). Estimating the relation between health and education: What do we know and what do we need to know? Economics of Education Review, 30, 778–791.
Gyimah-Brempong, K., & Wilson, M. (2004). Health human capital and economic growth in Sub-Saharan African and OECD countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 44(2), 296–320.
Hanushek, E. A., & Kim, D. (1995). Schooling, labor force quality, and economic growth. National bureau of economic research, Washington. NBERW5399.
Hartwig, J. (2010). Is health capital formation good for long-term economic growth? Panel Granger-causality evidence for OECD countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 32(1), 314–325.
Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., & Rosen, H. S. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, 56, 1371–1395.
Hsiao, F. S. T., & Hsiao, M. C. W. (2006). FDI, exports, and GDP in East and Southeast Asia: Panel data versus time-series causality analyses. Journal of Asian Economics, 17, 1082–1106.
Jayachandran, S., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2009). Life expectancy and human capital investments: Evidence from maternal mortality declines in Sri Lanka. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 349–397.
Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Ryder, H. E., & Weil, D. N. (2000). Mortality decline, human capital investment and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 62, 1–23.
Kenkel, D. S. (1991). Health behavior, health knowledge, and schooling. Journal of Political Economy, 99(2), 287–305.
Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger-causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23, 978–992.
Li, H., & Liang, H. (2010). Health, education, and economic growth in East Asia. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 3(2), 110–131.
Ljungberg, J., & Nilsson, A. (2009). Human Capital and Economic Growth: Sweden 1870–2000. Cliometrica, 3(1), 71–95.
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407–437.
Miguel, E., & Kremer, M. (2004). Worms: Identifying impacts on education and health in the presence of treatment externalities. Econometrica, 72(1), 159–217.
OECD (Ed.). (1998). Returns to investment in human capital. In Chapter 4 in Human capital investment: An international comparison. Paris: OECD, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation.
OECD. (2010). Social capital, human capital and health: What is evidence?. Paris: OECD.
Podrecca, E., & Carmeci, G. (2001). Fixed investment and economic growth: New results on causality. Applied Economics, 33, 177–182.
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Norman, N. R., & Bele, S. K. (2014). Economic growth and the development of telecommunications infrastructure in the G-20 countries: A panel-VAR approach. Telecommunications Policy. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2014.03.001i.
Pritchett, L. (2001). Where has all the education gone? World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 367–391.
Ranis, G., Stewart, F., & Ramirez, A. (2000). Economic growth and human development. World Development, 28(2), 197–219.
Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to ‘difference’ and ‘system’ GMM in Stata. Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 103.
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.
Saksena, S., & Deb, M. (2016). Economic Growth and Human Development in Indian States after two decades of Economic Reforms. MPRA Working Paper No. 71128.
Schultz, T. P. (1999). Health and schooling investments in Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(3), 67–88.
Selfa, S., & Grabowskib, R. (2003). Education and long-run development in Japan. Journal of Asian Economics, 14, 565–580.
Şen, H., Kaya, A., & Alpaslan, B. (2015). Education, health, and economic growth nexus: A bootstrap panel granger causality analysis for developing countries. The University of Manchester, Discussion Paper Series EDP-1502.
Silles, M. A. (2009). The causal effect of education on health: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 122–128.
Suri, T., Boozer, M., Ranis, G., & Stewart, F. (2011). Paths to success: The relationship between human development and economic growth. World Development, 39(4), 506–522.
Temple, J. (1999). The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 112–156.
Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 25–51.
World Bank (1993). World Development Report 1993: Investing in health. The World Bank, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
World Bank. (2013). World Development Indicators Database. Washington: World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bayraktar-Sağlam, B.BS. Re-Examining Vicious Circles of Development: A Panel Var Approach. Soc Indic Res 137, 231–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1594-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1594-4