Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 96, Issue 1, pp 323–336 | Cite as

On a path to creative destruction: science, technology and science-based technological trajectories of Japan and South Korea

  • Chan-Yuan Wong
Article

Abstract

This study attempts to examine systematically the growth trajectories of science, technology and science-based technologies of Japan and South Korea. Drawing upon the empirical materials and findings, this paper provides a detailed description of the evolution and pathways taken by Japan and South Korea to achieve growth in science and technology. Both the quantities (number of papers and patents) and impact (citations) measures of research activities are used to provide a coherent depiction of progress and development trajectories. Japan and South Korea achieved significant progress in production of science and technology. However, both economies experienced a sharp contraction in the number of citations per new patent since the mid 2000s. To address their structural systemic failure, Japan and South Korea have invested heavily in scientific areas that concord with the next wave of technological innovations. The effort has recorded positive effects on science-based technological growth trajectories.

Keywords

Science Technology Science-based technology Production trajectories Papers and patents Japan South Korea 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. The author would like to thank Dr. Siti Nurani, the head of Department of Science and Technology Studies of the University of Malaya, for her support in the subscribing to the research materials for this paper. The funding from the University of Malaya to support this research project is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Adams, J., & Griliches, Z. (1995). Measuring science: An exploration. Paper Presented at Science, Technology and Economy Colloquium, Irvine, October 20–22.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (1999). The hunt for S-curve growth paths in technological innovation: A patent study. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(4), 487–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernadas, A. T., & Albuquerque, E. M. (2003). Cross-over. Thresholds and interactions between science and technology: Lessons for less-developed countries, research policy, 32(5), 865–885.Google Scholar
  4. Choung, J.-Y., & Hwang, H.-R. (2000). National systems of innovation: Institutional linkages and performances in the case of Korea and Taiwan. Scientometrics, 48(3), 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choung, J.-Y., & Hwang, H.-R. (2012). The evolutionary patterns of knowledge production in Korea. Scientometrics forthcoming,. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0780-z.Google Scholar
  6. Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., & Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devedaz, T. C., Linstone, H. A., & Santos, H. J. S. (2005). The growth dynamics of the internet and the long wave theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(8), 913–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Labini, M. S. (2006). The relationships between science, technologies, and their industrial exploitation: an illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called European Paradox. Research Policy, 35(10), 1450–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grupp, H. (1996). Spillover effects and the science-based of innovations reconsidered: an empirical approach. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 6(2), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han, Y.-J. (2007). Measuring industrial knowledge stocks with patents and papers. Journal of Informetrics, 1(4), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jarvenpaa, H. M., Makinen, S. J., & Seppanen, M. (2011). Patent and publishing activity sequence over a technology’s life cycle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan, G.F. & Park, H-W. (Ed.) (2012), Triple Helix and Innovation in Asia: Putting University, Industry, and Government (UIG) relations in Context. Scientometrics, 90, 1, 1–326.Google Scholar
  13. Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kondo, M. (1990). Japanese R&D in robotics and genetic engineering. In J. Sigurdson (Ed.), Measuring the Dynamics of Technological Change (pp. 130–145). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  15. Kondo, M. (1999). R&D dynamics of creating patents in the Japanese industry. Research Policy, 28(6), 587–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kondo, M. (2012). A public research institute that created and led a large industrial group in Japan. Scientometrics, 90, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krahmer, M., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, K., & Kim, Y.-K. (2010). IPR and technological catch-up in Korea. In H. Odagiri, A. Goto, A. Sunami, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch-up (pp. 317–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contribution of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometric, 63(3), 617–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.). (1992). National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  21. Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., & Peretto, P. (1997). Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of innovation and international specialization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(6), 801–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Motohashi, K., & Muramatsu, S. (2012). Examining the university industry collaboration policy in Japan: Patent analysis. Technology in Society, 34(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Odagiri, H., Goto, A., & Sunami, A. (2010). IPR and the catch-up process in Japan. In H. Odagiri, A. Goto, A. Sunami, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch-up (pp. 317–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park, H.-W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks Of University—Industry—Government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pavitt, K. (1998). Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: what adam smith tells us and Joseph Schumepter Doesn’t? Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perez, C., & Soete, L. (1988). Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory (pp. 458–479). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  27. Schmoch, U. (1997). Indicators and the relations between science and technology. Scientometrics, 38(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmoch, U. (2007). Double-boom cycles and the comeback of science-push and market-pull. Research Policy, 36(7), 1000–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Watanabe, C., Asgari, B., & Nagamatsu, A. (2003). Virtuous cycle between R&D, functionality development and assimilation capacity for competitive strategy in Japan’s high-technology industry. Technovation, 23(11), 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Watanabe, C., Shin, J.-H., Akaike, S., & Charla, G.-B. (2009). Learning and Assimilation vs. M&A and innovation. Technology in Society, 31(3), 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watanabe, C., Tsuji, Y. S., & Brown, C. G. (2001a). Patent statistics: Deciphering a real versus a pseudo proxy of innovation. Technovation, 21(12), 783–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watanabe, C., Zhu, B., & Miyazawa, T. (2001b). Hierarchical impacts of the length of technology waves: An analysis of technolabor homeostasis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 68(1), 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wong, C.-Y., & Chandran, V. G. R. (2012). Technology stocks and economic performance of government-linked companies: The case of Malaysia. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(2), 248–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wong, C.-Y., & Goh, K.-L. (2010a). Modelling the behaviour of science and technology: Self-propagating growth in the diffusion process. Scientometrics, 84(3), 669–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wong, C.-Y., & Goh, K.-L. (2010b). Growth behavior of publications and patents: A comparative study on selected Asian Economies. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 460–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wong, C.-Y., & Goh, K.-L. (2012a). The sustainability of functionality development of science and technology: Papers and patents of emerging Economies. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wong, C.-Y., & Goh, K.-L. (2012b). The pathways for development: Science and technology of NIEs and selected emerging countries. Scientometrics, 92(3), 523–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Institute of Technology ManagementNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchu 300Taiwan

Personalised recommendations