Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp 73–89 | Cite as

Mapping of biotechnology patents of China from 1995–2008

  • Zifeng Chen
  • Jiancheng Guan
Article

Abstract

The patents of China in biotechnology in the United States Patent and Trademark Office during 1995–2008 have been analyzed in this paper with the help of bibliometrics and social network analysis techniques. The analysis has been carried out from several perspectives including total patent output of industries, universities and public research institutes (PRIs) and their positions in the knowledge network, the main innovators and their interactions, the collaboration among Chinese regions and the collaborations from abroad. The results show that though with some improvements, the patent performance of Chinese organizations and regions in biotechnology still need to be improved. The connections between Chinese innovators are not very cohesive and they depend heavily on foreign knowledge, especial knowledge from U.S. multinational firms and universities. The important innovators of China in this field are mainly PRIs and universities. More and stronger firm innovators, especially large and powerful multinational companies, are strongly needed for the nation’s biotechnology industry.

Keywords

Patent Collaboration Social network Innovation performance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project no. 70773006) and the National Social Science Foundation of China (Project no. 10zd&014).The authors are very grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions of the anonymous reviewers and Editor-in-Chief Prof. Braun, which significantly improved the article.

References

  1. BIO. (2008). Guide to biotechnology 2008. Washington, DC: BIO.Google Scholar
  2. Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (Eds.). (2005). Clusters. Oxford: Networks and Innovation Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy, 35(4), 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Z. F., & Guan, J. C. (2010). The impact of small world on innovation: An empirical study of 16 countries. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 97–106.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ernst and Young LLP. (2007). Beyond borders: the global biotechnology report 2007. Palo Alto: Ernst and Young LLP.Google Scholar
  6. Fleming, L., King, C., & Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18, 938–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao, X., & Guan, J. C. (2009a). Networks of scientific journals: An exploration of Chinese patent data. Scientometrics, 80(1), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao, X., & Guan, J. C. (2009b). A scale-independent analysis of the performance of the Chinese innovation system. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilding, M. (2008). ‘The tyranny of distance’: Biotechnology networks and clusters in the antipodes. Research Policy, 37, 1132–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glaser, V. (2007). China expanding bioresearch acivities. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News, 27(28), 1.Google Scholar
  11. Guan, J. C., & He, Y. (2007). Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science-technology linkages. Scientometrics, 72(3), 403–425.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guan, J. C., & Wang, G. B. (2010). A comparative study of research performance in nanotechnology for China’s inventor-authors and their non-inventing peers. Scientometrics, 84(2), 331–343.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanaki, N., Nakajima, R., & Ogura, Y. (2010). The dynamics of R&D network in the IT industry. Research Policy, 39(3), 386–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hertzum, M. (2008). Collaborative information seeking: The combined activity of information seeking and collaborative grounding. Information Processing & Management, 44, 957–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hinze, S., & Schmoch, U. (2005). Opening the black box. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 215–235). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Hu, A. G. Z., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citation and international knowledge flow: The case of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(6), 849–880.Google Scholar
  17. Kim, M.-J. (2007). A bibliometric analysis of the effectiveness of Korea’s biotechnology stimulation plans, with a comparison with four other Asian nation. Scientometrics, 72(3), 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lecocq, C., & Van Looy, B. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the technological performance of regions: Time invariant or driven by life cycle dynamics? An explorative investigation of European regions in the field of biotechnology. Scientometrics, 80(3), 845–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lim, H., & Park, Y. (2010). Identification of technological knowledge intermediaries. Scientometrics, 84, 543–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, X. L., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30, 1091–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nasir, A., Ali, T. M., Shahdin, S., & Rahman, T. U. (2010). Technology achievement index 2009: Ranking and comparative study of nations. Scientometrics. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0285-6.
  23. OECD. (2005). A framework for biotechnology statistics. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  24. OECD. (2008). Compendium of patent statistics. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. Patra, S. K., & Chand, P. (2005). Biotechnology research profile of India. Scientometrics, 63(3), 583–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Podolny, J., & Page, K. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
  28. Ramani, S. V., & Looze, M. A. (2002). Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biotechnology sectors: An application to France, Germany and the U.K. Scientometrics, 54(3), 319–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yuan, J. P., Yue, W. P., Su, C., et al. (2010). Patent activity on water pollution and treatment in China: A scientometric perspective. Scientometrics, 83, 639–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management EngineeringXi’an University of Posts and TelecommunicationsXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of ManagementGraduate University, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations