Post-crisis firm survival, business model changes, and learning: evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry

Article
First Online:
Accepted:
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Company survival after recessions depends on the entrepreneurial ability of decision makers to react to the crisis and learn how to make the best use of chances. The aim of this paper is to shed light on the relationship between post-crisis firm survival, learning, and firm’s entrepreneurial behavior measured by business model changes. Specifically, we test if firm survival after the 2009 recession has been affected by changes in the business model occurred in the period of recovery between the two recessions (2004–08), and if these changes are the result of deliberate reactions to the 2003 recession—i.e., learning hypothesis. The analysis of 67,241 Italian manufacturing firms suggests that business model changes have affected post-crisis firm survival by lowering the probability of default. However, the adoption of these default-reducing business model changes did not result to be significantly more frequent in firms that performed poorly during the 2003 crisis, thus providing weak support to the role of entrepreneurial learning in reducing defaults.

Keywords

Firm survival Business model Firm performance Learning Entrepreneurship Crisis Family firm 

JEL codes

L25 L26 L60 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Amorós, J. E. (2008). Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics in Latin America. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akgün, A. E., Lynn, G. S., & Yılmaz, C. (2006). Learning process in new product development teams and effects on product success: a socio-cognitive perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(2), 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andries, P., & Debackere, K. (2007). Adaptation and performance in new businesses: understanding the moderating effects of independence and industry. Small Business Economics, 29(1–2), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archibugi, D., Filippetti, A., & Frenz, M. (2013). Economic crisis and innovation: is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Research Policy, 42(2), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azadegan, A., & Dooley, K. J. (2010). Supplier innovativeness, organizational learning styles and manufacturer performance: an empirical assessment. Journal of Operations Management, 28(6), 488–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bapuji, H., & Crossan, M. (2004). From questions to answers: reviewing organizational learning research. Management Learning, 35(4), 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barlevy, G. (2004). The cost of business cycles under endogenous growth. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 964–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Basu, S., & Wadhwa, A. (2013). External venturing and discontinuous strategic renewal: an options perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 956–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhatnagar, J. (2007). Predictors of organizational commitment in India: strategic HR roles, organizational learning capability and psychological empowerment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1782–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjuggren, P. O., & Sund, L. G. (2014). A contractual perspective on succession in family firms: a stakeholder view. European Journal of Law and Economics, 38(2), 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouchikhi, H., & Kimberly, J. R. (2003). Escaping the identity trap. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 20.Google Scholar
  14. Caballero, R. J., & Hammour, M. L. (1996). On the timing and efficiency of creative destruction. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 805–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (Eds.) (1995). Organizations in Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 354–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chindooroy, R., Muller, P., & Notaro, G. (2007). Company survival following rescue and restructuring State aid. European Journal of Law and Economics, 24(2), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corbett, A., Covin, J. G., O'Connor, G. C., & Tucci, C. L. (2013). Corporate Entrepreneurship: State-of-the-Art Research and a Future Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 812–820.Google Scholar
  20. Cucculelli, M., & Bettinelli, C. (2015). Business models, intangibles and firm performance: evidence on corporate entrepreneurship from Italian manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cucculelli, M., & Bettinelli, C. (2016). Corporate governance in family firms, learning and reaction to recession: evidence from Italy. Futures, 75, 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Dei Ottati, G. (1995). Tra mercato e comunità: aspetti concettuali e ricerche empiriche. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  24. Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Desai, V. M. (2014). Does disclosure matter? Integrating organizational learning and impression management theories to examine the impact of public disclosure following failures. Strategic Organization, 12(2), 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., & Zellweger, T. M. (2012). Exploring the entrepreneurial behavior of family firms: does the stewardship perspective explain differences? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. (2008). Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 459–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freeman, C., Clark, J., & Soete, L. (1982). Unemployment and Technical Innovation: a Study of Long Waves in economic Development. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  29. George, G., & Bock, A. J. (2011). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geroski, P. A., & Walters, C. F. (1995). Innovative activity over the business cycle. The Economic Journal, 105, 916–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. (2001). Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: the role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hannan, M. T., Carroll, G. R., Dundon, E. A., & Torres, J. C. (1995). Organizational evolution in a multinational context: entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany, and Italy. American Sociological Review, 60, 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herbane, B. (2014). Information value distance and crisis management planning. SAGE Open, 4(2), 2158244014532929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Istat (2005). I Sistemi Locali del Lavoro, in Istat. Censimento 2001. Dati definitivi. Roma: ISTAT.Google Scholar
  37. Jarillo, J. C. (1995). Strategic Networks. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 57–68.Google Scholar
  39. Kandemir, D., & Hult, G. T. M. (2005). A conceptualization of an organizational learning culture in international joint ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(5), 430–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2013). Clarifying the domains of corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(3), 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Hayton, J. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: the innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Latham, S. (2009). Contrasting strategic response to economic recession in start-up versus established software firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(2), 180–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leung, S., & Horwitz, B. (2010). Corporate governance and firm value during a financial crisis. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 34(4), 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. (2006). Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 366–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu, C., Uchida, K., & Yang, Y. (2012). Corporate governance and firm value during the global financial crisis: evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Markides, C. (2008). Game-changing strategies: How to create new market space in established industries by breaking the rules. New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Marsen, S. (2014). “Lock the Doors” toward a narrative–semiotic approach to organizational crisis. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(3), 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mensch, G., & West Internationales Institut für Management und Verwaltung (Berlin). (1979). Stalemate in technology: innovations overcome the depression. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  49. Menzel, M-P., & Fornahl, D. (2010). Cluster life cycles—dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(1), 205–238.Google Scholar
  50. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: an empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.Google Scholar
  51. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage From Great Family Businesses. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  52. Minetti, R., Murro, P., & Paiella, M. (2015). Ownership structure, governance, and innovation. European Economic Review, 80, 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Perlow, L. A., Okhuysen, G. A., & Repenning, N. P. (2002). The speed trap: exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 931–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: FreePress.Google Scholar
  56. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.Google Scholar
  57. Pozzana, R. (2011). Modelli di business e competizione nelle piccole imprese manifatturiere. In R. Paolazzi & F. Trau (Eds.), Effetti della Crisi, Materie Prime e Rilancio Manifatturiero, le Strategie di Sviluppo delle Imprese Italiane. Rome: Confindustria Centro Studi.Google Scholar
  58. Santos-Vijande, M. L., Sanzo-Perez, M. J., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I., & Vazquez-Casielles, R. (2005). Organizational learning and market orientation: interface and effects on performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(3), 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Business model innovation: towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1340001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles (Vol. 1, pp. 161–174). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  61. Sforzi, F. (1987). L’identificazione spaziale, in: G. Becattini (a cura di) Mercato e forze locali: il distretto industriale (pp. 143–167). Bologna: Il Mulino. Google Scholar
  62. Smith, D., & Elliott, D. (2007). Exploring the barriers to learning from crisis: organizational learning and crisis. Management Learning, 38(5), 519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N., & Velamuri, S. R. (2010). Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: the Naturhouse case. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Sridhar, S. (2011). Should firms spend more on research and development and advertising during recessions? Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stein, A., & Smith, M. (2009). CRM systems and organizational learning: an exploration of the relationship between CRM effectiveness and the customer information orientation of the firm in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2), 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thoma, G. (2009). Striving for a large market: evidence from a general purpose technology in action. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(1), 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thomsen, S. (1999). Corporate ownership by industrial foundations. European Journal of Law and Economics, 7(2), 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tucker, A. L., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2007). Implementing new practices: an empirical study of organizational learning in hospital intensive care units. Management Science, 53(6), 894–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weerawardena, J., O’Cass, A., & Julian, C. (2006). Does industry matter? Examining the role of industry structure and organizational learning in innovation and brand performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., & Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: a resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Social SciencesUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations