Small Business Economics

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 493–501 | Cite as

Family ties, firm performance and managerial compensations in African SMEs

  • Eugene Bempong Nyantakyi


This paper uses data from the World Banks Enterprise Surveys to assess the impact of family ties on managerial compensations in selected African SMEs. The results suggest that while managers who are related to the owners of an enterprise receive higher performance-based compensations than professional managers, their compensations are less sensitive to firm performance than that of professional managers. These findings parallel those of Chinese enterprise managers identified by Cai et al. (Rev Econ Stat 95(3), 850–867, 2013). This suggests that family relations play a significant role in compensation schemes for enterprises in developing and emerging markets and that differential treatment exists between family and non-family managers.


Family ties Managerial compensation African SMEs 

JEL Classifications

L26 M12 M52 O55 



I thank the associate editor Erik E. Lehmann, an anonymous referee, Ousman Gajigo, Christa Jensen and Adam Pellillo for helpful comments.


  1. Atkin, D., Khandelwal, A.M., & Vogel, J. (2011). Institutions, family firms and the lack of manufacturing employment: Evidence from Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  2. Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2011). Small vs. young firms across the world: Contribution to employment, job creation, and growth. World bank policy research working paper (5631).Google Scholar
  3. Beck, T., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(11), 2931–2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand, M., & Schoar, A. (2006). The role of family in family firms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigsten, A., & Söderbom, M. (2006). What have we learned from a decade of manufacturing enterprise surveys in Africa? The World Bank Research Observer, 21(2), 241–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai, H., Li, H., Park, A., & Zhou, L.-A. (2013). Family ties and organizational design: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 850–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eifert, B., Gelb, A., & Ramachandran, V. (2008). The cost of doing business in Africa: Evidence from enterprise survey data. World Development, 36(9), 1531–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haddad, L., & Maluccio, J. A. (2003). Trust, membership in groups, and household welfare: Evidence from Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51(3), 573–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kauffmann, C. (2005). Financing SMEs in Africa. Technical report. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Lacovone, L., Ramachandran, V., & Schmidt, M. (2014). Stunted growth: Why don’t African firms create more jobs? Center for global development Working paper (353).Google Scholar
  11. Söderbom, M., & Teal, F. (2004). Size and efficiency in African manufacturing firms: Evidence from firm-level panel data. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 369–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Te Velde, D. W., & Morrissey, O. (2003). Do workers in Africa get a wage premium if employed in firms owned by foreigners? Journal of African Economies, 12(1), 41–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Biesebroeck, J. (2005). Firm size matters: Growth and productivity growth in African manufacturing. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53(3), 545–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Development Research Department, The African Development Bank GroupImmeuble du Centre de Commerce International d’AbidjanAbidjanIvory Coast

Personalised recommendations