Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: the case of a hybrid model
- 1k Downloads
Over the past decades, universities have increasingly become ambidextrous organizations reconciling scientific and commercial missions. In order to manage this ambidexterity, technology transfer offices (TTOs) were established in most universities. This paper studies a specific, often implemented, but rather understudied type of TTO, namely a hybrid TTO model uniting centralized and decentralized levels. Employing a qualitative research design, we examine how and why the two TTO levels engage in diverse boundary spanning activities to help nascent spin-off companies move through the pre-spin-off process. Our research identifies differences in the types of boundary spanning activities that centralized and decentralized TTOs perform and in the parties they engage with. We find geographical, technological and organizational proximity to be important antecedents of the TTOs’ engagement in external and internal boundary spanning activities. These results have important implications for both academics and practitioners interested in university technology transfer through spin-off creation.
KeywordsTechnology transfer office Boundary spanning Proximity Nascent spin-offs
JEL ClassificationsL26 M13 O32
The authors would like to thank all respondents who participated in the data collection for this study. The first author also gratefully acknowledges the financial support provided by Research Foundation Flanders. We would further like to thank the organizers and participants of the ZEW workshop on spin-off entrepreneurship in Mannheim, November 2011, for their comments on our paper. Finally, we thank the guest editor and two anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped us to improve our paper.
- Apple, K. S. (2008). Evaluating technology transfer offices. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, 17, 139–157.Google Scholar
- Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. P., & Peterson, M. F. (2000). The handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case-study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
- Hackett, E. (2001). Organizational perspectives on university-industry research relations. In J. Croissant & S. P. Restivo (Eds.), Degrees of compromise (pp. 1–21). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The politics of organizational decision-making. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
- Polkinghorne, D. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences (SUNY series in philosophy of the social sciences). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed., Applied social research methods series, Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar