Small Business Economics

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 729–746 | Cite as

University choice and entrepreneurship



This paper aims at shedding light upon the impact of universities on graduates’ entrepreneurial choice. Previous studies analyze the relationship between the choice of university and labor market success of graduates in terms of their subsequent wages, employability or over-education, whereas the possible link between the choice of university and entrepreneurial choice is neglected. Using 1998–2008 data on graduates from Swedish higher education institutions, the paper finds significant variation in the impact of universities on the career choice of graduates. The results suggest that graduates with degrees in the social sciences, natural sciences, medicine and teacher education from more prestigious universities systematically differ from others in their entrepreneurial choice. At the same time, no statistically significant difference is found for technical science graduates.


Universities Education Entrepreneurship Graduates 

JEL Classifications

L26 M53 M54 



We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for providing valuable comments and suggestions.


  1. Angrist, J., & Pischke, J. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Audretsch, D., & Fritsch, M. (1994). The geography of firm births in Germany. Regional Studies, 28(4), 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumol, W. (2004). Education for innovation: Entrepreneurial breakthroughs versus corporate incremental improvement. NBER working paper 10578. Google Scholar
  4. Black, D., & Smith, J. (2004). How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1–2), 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, D., & Smith, J. (2006). Estimating the returns to college quality with multiple proxies for quality. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 701–728.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchflower, D. (2000). Self-employment in OECD countries. Labor Economics, 7(5), 471–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brand, J., & Halaby, C. (2006). Regression and matching estimates of the effects of elite college attendance on educational and career achievement. Social Science Research, 35, 749–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braunerhjelm, P. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship: Social norms, university culture and policies. Science and Public Policy, 34(9), 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brewer, D., Eide, E., & Ehrenberg, R. (1999). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Journal of Human Resources, 34(1), 105–123.Google Scholar
  11. Broström, A., & Källblad, E. (2005). The KTH Entrepreneurial Faculty Project. VINNOVA report, VR 2005:13.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, S., & Sessions, J. (2004). 2 Signaling and screening. In J. Geraint & J. Johnes (Eds.), International handbook on the economics of education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  13. Burke, A., FitzRoy, F., & Nolan, M. (2002). Self-employment, wealth and job creation: The roles of gender, non-pecuniary motivation and entrepreneurial ability. Small Business Economics, 19, 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cameron, C., & Trivedi, P. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ciriaci, D., & Muscio, A. (2010). Does university choice drive graduates’ employability? MPRA Working Paper No 22846.Google Scholar
  16. Dale, S., & Krueger, A. (2002). Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college. An application of selection on observables and unobservables. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1491–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dale, S., & Krueger, A. (2011). Estimating the return to college selectivity over the career using administrative earnings data. Working paper no 17159. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Eliasson, K. (2006). College choice and earnings among university graduates in Sweden. Umeå Economic Studies 693, Umeå University, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  19. Evans, D., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 808–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans, D., & Leighton, L. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79, 519–535.Google Scholar
  21. Folta, T., Delmar, F., & Wennberg, K. (2010). Hybrid entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(2), 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gold, R., Falck, O., & Heblich, S. (2011). The long wind of change. Educational impacts on entrepreneurial intentions. In European regional science association (ERSA) conference papers. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  23. Hammarstedt, M. (2004). Self-employment among immigrants in Sweden—an analysis of intragroup differences. Small Business Economics, 23(2), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hermansson, K. (2011). The overall economic impact of higher education institutions (HEI) on their host sub-regions: Multi-sectorial analysis for the city of Glasgow. Dissertation. Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
  25. Herrmann, K., Hannon, P., Cox, J., Ternouth, P., & Crowley, T. (2008). Developing entrepreneurial graduates: Putting entrepreneurship at the centre of higher education. Council for Industry and Higher Education (CIHE), National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship (NCGE) and National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA), London.Google Scholar
  26. Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E., & Judge, G. G. (2007). Using Stata for principles of econometrics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Hoekstra, M. (2009). The effect of attending the flagship state university on earnings: A discontinuity-based approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(4), 717–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Imbens, G., & Wooldridge, J. (2007). What is new in econometrics. NBER lecture notes 6, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Lazear, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4), 649–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindahl, L., & Regner, H. (2005). College choice and subsequent earnings: Results using Swedish sibling data. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107(3), 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lucas, R. (1978). On the size distribution of business firms. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundin, M. (2006). Effects of college choice on incomes in Sweden. Working paper R2007:016. Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies, Östersund, Sweden.Google Scholar
  33. Luthje, C., & Franke, N. (2002). Fostering entrepreneurship through university education and training: Lessons from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Paper presented at 2nd annual conference on innovative research in management. May 9–11, 2002, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  34. McGuinness, S. (2003). University quality and labour market outcomes. Applied Economics, 35, 1943–1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McMullan, W., Chrisman, J., & Vesper, K. (2002). Lessons from successful innovations in entrepreneurial support programming. In J. J. Chrisman, J. A. D. Holbrook, & J. H. Chua (Eds.), Innovation and entrepreneurship in Western Canada: From family businesses to multinationals. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  36. Monks, J. (2000). The returns to individual and college characteristics. Evidence from the national longitudinal survey of youth. Economics of Education Review, 19(3), 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parker, S. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peterman, N., & Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise education: Influencing students’ perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petrin, A., & Train, K. (2010). A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pfarr, C., Schmid, A., & Schneider, U. (2011). Estimating ordered categorical variables using panel data: A generalized ordered probit model with an autofit procedure. Journal of Economics and Econometrics, 54(1), 7–23.Google Scholar
  41. Rees, H., & Shah, A. (1986). An empirical analysis of self-employment in the UK. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1(1), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reynolds, P., Storey, D. J., & Westhead, P. (1994). Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional Studies, 28(4), 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robst, J. (1995). Career mobility, job match, and over-education. Eastern Economic Journal, 21(4), 539–550.Google Scholar
  44. Smart, J. (1986). College effects on occupational status attainment. Research in Higher Education, 24(1), 73–95.Google Scholar
  45. Stuart, T., & Ding, W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Train, K. (2009). Discrete choice models with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van der Sluis, J., & Van Praag, M. (2010). Education and entrepreneurship selection and performance: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(5), 795–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Praag, M., & Cramer, J. (2001). The roots of entrepreneurship and labour demand: Individual ability and low risk aversion. Economica, 2001, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Verheul, I., Thurik, R., Hessels, J., & van der Zwan, P. (2010). Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. EIM Research Reports H, 11, 1–24.Google Scholar
  50. Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, R. (2007). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata Journal, 6(1), 58–82.Google Scholar
  52. Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Department of Industrial Economics and ManagementThe Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations