Advertisement

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 117–136 | Cite as

Strategic self-ignorance

  • Linda Thunström
  • Jonas Nordström
  • Jason F. Shogren
  • Mariah Ehmke
  • Klaas van’t Veld
Article

Abstract

We examine strategic self-ignorance—the use of ignorance as an excuse to over-indulge in pleasurable activities that may be harmful to one’s future self. Our model shows that guilt aversion provides a behavioral rationale for present-biased agents to avoid information about negative future impacts of such activities. We then confront our model with data from an experiment using prepared, restaurant-style meals—a good that is transparent in immediate pleasure (taste) but non-transparent in future harm (calories). Our results support the notion that strategic self-ignorance matters: nearly three of five subjects (58%) chose to ignore free information on calorie content, leading at-risk subjects to consume significantly more calories. We also find evidence consistent with our model on the determinants of strategic self-ignorance.

Keywords

Strategic ignorance Calorie information avoidance Guilt aversion Self-control 

JEL Classification

D03 D81 D83 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank David Granlund for helpful comments and suggestions, and seminar participants at the FOI, University of Copenhagen, and participants at the AAEA Annual Meeting 2012. Financial support is gratefully acknowledged from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, the Swedish Retail and Wholesale Development Council, and University of Wyoming’s College of Agriculture and Natural Resources’ Global Perspectives Funds. The collection of data from human subjects for this study has been approved by the Ethics Committee at Lund University. We thank Carin Blom for excellent research assistance.

Supplementary material

11166_2016_9236_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (396 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 396 kb)

References

  1. Ainslie, G. W. (1992). Picoeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G. (1991). Procrastination and obedience. American Economic Review, 81(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
  3. Ameriks, J., Caplin, A., Leahy, J., & Tyler, T. (2007). Measuring self-control problems. American Economic Review, 97(3), 966–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreoni, J., & Bernheim, D. B. (2009). Social image and the 50-50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica, 77(5), 1607–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2004). Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fund-raising. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-8), 1605–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barigozzi, F., & Levaggi, R. (2010). Emotional decision-makers and anomalous attitudes towards information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40(3), 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, D. E. (1985). Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1999a). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Comment. American Economic Review, 89(1), 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1999b). The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 38(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borgmeier, I., & Westenhoefer, J. (2009). Impact of different food label formats on healthiness evaluation and food choice of consumers: A randomized-controlled study. BMC Public Health, 9, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunnermeier, M. K., & Parker, J. A. (2005). Optimal expectations. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1092–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burton, S., Creyer, E., Kees, J., & Huggins, K. (2006). Attacking the obesity epidemic: The potential health benefits of providing nutrition information in restaurants. American Journal of Public Health, 96(9), 1669–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caplin, A., & Leahy, J. (2001). Psychological expected utility and anticipatory feelings. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carillo, J. D., & Mariotti, T. (2000). Strategic ignorance as a self-disciplining device. Review of Economic Studies, 67(3), 529–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Charness, G., & Dufwenberg, M. (2006). Promises and partnership. Econometrica, 74(6), 1579–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2008). What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowburn, G., & Stockley, L. (2005). Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: A systematic review. Public Health Nutrition, 8(1), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dana, J., Kuang, J., & Weber, R. (2007). Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, 33(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delquié, P., & Cillo, A. (2006). Disappointment without prior expectation: A unifying perspective on decision under risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33(3), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dewberry, C., & Ussher, J. M. (2001). Restraint and perception of body weight among British adults. Journal of Social Psychology, 134(5), 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drichoutis, A. C., Lazaridis, P., & Nayga, R. M., Jr. (2005). Nutrition knowledge and consumer use of nutritional food labels. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(1), 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dumanovsky, T., Nonas, C. A., Huang, C. Y., Silver, L. D., & Bassett, M. T. (2009). What people buy from fast food restaurants: Calorie content and menu item selection, New York City 2007. Obesity, 17(7), 1369–1374.Google Scholar
  24. Elbel, B., Kersh, R., Brescoll, V. L., & Dixon, L. B. (2009). Calorie labeling and food choices: A first look at the effects on low-income people in New York City. Health Affairs, 28(6), W1110–W1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elbel, B., Gyamfi, J., & Kersh, R. (2011). Child and adolescent fast-food choice and the influence of calorie labeling: A natural experiment. International Journal of Obesity, 35(4), 493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., Tjotta, S., & Torsvik, G. (2010). Testing guilt aversion. Games and Economic Behavior, 68(1), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gul, F. (1991). A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica, 59(3), 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review, 86(3), 563–660.Google Scholar
  29. Hoy, M., Peter, R., & Richter, A. (2014). Take-up for genetic tests and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 48(2), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jia, J., Dyer, J. S., & Butler, J. C. (2001). Generalized disappointment models. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22(1), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, G., & Seppi, D. (2009). The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 38(2), 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M., & Mukerji, S. (2005). A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica, 73(6), 1849–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kőszegi, B. (2003). Health anxiety and patient behavior. Journal of Health Economics, 22(6), 1073–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Larson, T., & Capra, C. M. (2009). Exploiting moral wiggle room: Illusory preference for fairness? A comment. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), 467–474.Google Scholar
  36. Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Machina, M. (1989). Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Literature, 27(4), 1622–1668.Google Scholar
  38. Nayga, R. M. (1996). Determinants of consumers’ use of nutritional information on food packages. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 28(2), 303–312.Google Scholar
  39. O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89(1), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Studying optimal paternalism, illustrated by a model of sin taxes. American Economic Review, 93(2), 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oster, E., Shoulson, I., & Dorsey, E. R. (2013). Optimal expectations and limited medical testing: Evidence from Huntington disease. American Economic Review, 103(2), 804–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2009). Is mistrust self-fulfilling? Economics Letters, 104(2), 89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schlee, E. (1990). The value of information in anticipated utility theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 3(1), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snow, A. (2010). Ambiguity and the value of information. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 40(2), 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Soetevent, A. R. (2005). Anonymity in giving in a natural context—a field experiment in 30 churches. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11-12), 2301–2323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Steenhuis, I. (2008). Guilty or not? Feelings of guilt about food among college women. Appetite, 52(2), 531–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Strotz, R. H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93(2), 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vadiveloo, M. K., Dixon, L. B., & Elbel, B. (2011). Consumer purchasing patterns in response to calorie labeling legislation in New York City. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van der Weele, J. (2012). When ignorance is innocence: On information avoidance in moral dilemmas. Mimeo, http://ssrn.com/abstract = 1844702.
  52. Vanberg, C. (2008). Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica, 76(6), 1467–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wakker, P. (1988). Nonexpected utility as aversion of information. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1(3), 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wansink, B., Cheney, M. M., & Chan, N. (2003). Exploring comfort food preferences across age and gender. Physiology and Behavior, 79(4-5), 739–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Thunström
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jonas Nordström
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jason F. Shogren
    • 2
  • Mariah Ehmke
    • 5
  • Klaas van’t Veld
    • 2
  1. 1.HUI Research ABStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Economics and FinanceUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsLund UniversityLundSweden
  4. 4.Department of Food and Resource EconomicsUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
  5. 5.Department of Agricultural and Applied EconomicsUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations