# Whom should we believe? Aggregation of heterogeneous beliefs

Article

First Online:

- 208 Downloads
- 13 Citations

## Abstract

We examine the collective risk attitude of a group with heterogeneous beliefs. We prove that the wealth-dependent probability distribution used by the representative agent is biased in favor of the beliefs of the more risk tolerant consumers. Moreover, increasing disagreement on the state probability raises the state probability of the representative agent. It implies that when most disagreements are concentrated in the tails of the distribution, the perceived collective risk is magnified. This can help to solve the equity premium puzzle. We show that the trade volume and the equity premium are positively correlated.

## Keywords

Aggregation of beliefs State-dependent utility Efficient risk sharing Disagreement Asset pricing Portfolio choices## JEL Classification

D81 D83## References

- Athey, Susan C. (2002). “Monotone Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty,”
*Quarterly Journal of Economics*117(1), 187–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Abel, Andrew B. (2002). “An Exploration of the Effects of Optimism and Doubt on Asset Returns,”
*Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control*26, 1075–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Borch, Karl. (1960). “The Safety Loading of Reinsurance Premiums,”
*Skandinavisk Aktuarietskrift*153–184.Google Scholar - Borch, Karl. (1962). “Equilibrium in a Reinsurance Market,”
*Econometrica*30, 424–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bossaerts, Peter, Paolo Ghirardato, Serena Guarnaschelli, and William Zame. (2007). “The Impact of Ambiguity on Prices and Allocations in Competitive Financial Markets,” Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Calvet, Laurent, Jean-Michel Grandmont, and Isabelle Lemaire. (2001). “Aggregation of Heterogeneous Beliefs and Asset Pricing in Complete Financial Markets,” Mimeo, Harvard University and CREST (Paris).Google Scholar
- Chapman, David A. and Valery Polkovnichenko. (2006). “Heterogeneity in Preferences and Asset Market Outcomes,” Mimeo, Boston College.Google Scholar
- Cecchetti, Stephen G., Pok-Sang Lam, and Nelson C. Mark. (2000). “Asset Pricing with Distorted Beliefs: Are Equity Returns too Good to be True?”
*American Economic Review*90, 787–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Constantinides, Georges M. (1982). “Intertemporal Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Consumers and Without Demand Aggregation,”
*Journal of Business*55, 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Drèze, Jacques. (2001). “Loss Reduction and Implicit Deductibles in Medical Insurance,” CORE Discussion Paper, University of Louvain.Google Scholar
- Drèze, Jacques and Aldo Rustichini. (2001). “State-Dependent Utility and Decision Theory.” In Salvador Barbera, Peter Hammond, and Christian Seidl (eds),
*Handbook of Utility Theory 2*. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Gajdos, Thibault, Jean-Marc Tallon, and Jean-Christophe Vergnaud. (2005). “On the Impossibility of Preference Aggregation Under Uncertainty,” Mimeo, University of Paris 1.Google Scholar
- Gilboa, Itzhak, Dov Samet, and David Schmeidler. (2004). “Utilitarian Aggregation of Beliefs and Tastes,”
*Journal of Political Economy*112, 932–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gollier, Christian. (1995). “The Comparative Statics of Changes in Risk Revisited,”
*Journal of Economic Theory*66, 522–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gollier, Christian. (2001).
*The Economics of Risk and Time*. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar - Gollier, Christian. (2003). “Who Should We Believe? Collective Risk-taking Decisions with Heterogeneous Beliefs,” Cahiers2003/0325131, http://www.toulouse.inra.fr/leerna.
- Hylland, Aanund and Richard Zeckhauser. (1979). “The Impossibility of Bayesian Group Decision Making with Separate Aggregation of Beliefs and Values,”
*Econometrica*47, 1321–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ingersoll, Jonathan E. (1987).
*Theory of Financial Decision Making*. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar - Jouini, Elyès and Clothilde Napp. (2005). “Pessimism, Riskiness, Risk Aversion and the Market Price of Risk,” Mimeo, University of Paris-Dauphine.Google Scholar
- Jouini, Elyès and Clothilde Napp. (2006). “Aggregation of Heterogeneous Beliefs,”
*Journal of Mathematical Economics*42, 752–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jouini, Elyès and Clothilde Napp. (2007). “Consensus Consumer and Intertemporal Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Beliefs,”
*Review of Economic Studies*74, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Karni, Edi. (1993). “A Definition of Subjective Probabilities with State-Dependent Preferences,”
*Econometrica*61, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Karni, Edi and David Schmeidler. (1993). “On the Uniqueness of Subjective Probabilities,”
*Economic Theory*3, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kimball, Miles S. (1990). “Precautionary Savings in the Small and in the Large,”
*Econometrica*58, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Leland, Hayne E. (1980). “Who Should Buy Portfolio Insurance?”
*Journal of Finance*35, 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lintner, John. (1969). “The Aggregation of Investor’s Diverse Judgments and Preferences in Purely Competitive Security Markets,”
*Journal of Financial and Quantitative Economics*4, 347–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lucas, Robert E. (1978). “Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy,”
*Econometrica*46, 1429–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mongin, Philippe. (1995). “Consistent Bayesian Aggregation,”
*Journal of Economic Theory*66, 313–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nau, Robert F. (1995). “Coherent Decision Analysis with Inseparable Probabilities and Utilities,”
*Journal of Risk and Uncertainty*10, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nau, Robert F. (2003). “A Generalization of Pratt–Arrow Measure to Non-Expected-Utility Preferences and Inseparable Probability and Utility,”
*Management Science*49, 1089–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rothschild, Michael and Joseph Stiglitz. (1970). “Increasing Risk: I. A Definition,”
*Journal of Economic Theory*2, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rothschild, Michael and Joseph Stiglitz. (1971). “Increasing Risk: II. Its Economic Consequences,”
*Journal of Economic Theory*3, 66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rubinstein, Mark. (1974). “An Aggregation Theorem for Securities Markets,”
*Journal of Financial Economics*1, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Varian, Hal. (1985). “Divergence of Opinion in Complete Markets,”
*Journal of Finance*40, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wilson, Robert. (1968). “The Theory of Syndicates,”
*Econometrica*36, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007