Science Self-Efficacy in the Primary Classroom: Using Mixed Methods to Investigate Sources of Self-Efficacy

Article
  • 221 Downloads

Abstract

Self-efficacy has been shown to influence student engagement, effort and performance as well as course selection and future career choice. Extending our knowledge regarding the development of self-efficacy has important implications for educators and for those concerned about the international uptake of science careers. Previous research has identified four sources that may contribute towards self-efficacy: mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion and physiological/affective states. Very little research has been conducted within the school environment that looks at the formation of these sources and yet early school experiences have been posited to be a key factor in girls’ lack of engagement in post compulsory science education. This paper investigates children’s self-efficacy beliefs in science and reports on findings from mixed method research conducted with 182 children aged between 10 and 12 years. Classroom data were collected through focus groups, individual interviews and surveys. Findings revealed that although girls and boys held similar levels of academic performance in science, many girls underestimated their capability. The four sources of self-efficacy identified by Bandura (1997) plus self-regulation as an additional source, were evident in the children’s descriptions, with boys being more influenced by mastery experience and girls by a combination of vicarious experience and physiological/affective states. Girl’s appraisal of information appeared to operate through a heuristic process whereby girls disregarded salient information such as teacher feedback in favour of reliance on social comparison. Contextual factors were identified. Implications for science teachers are discussed.

Keywords

Self-efficacy Sources of self-efficacy Science Primary school Social comparison 

References

  1. Abele, A. F., & Spurk, D. (2009). The longitudinal impact of self-efficacy and career goals on objective and subjective career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn, H. S., Usher, E. L., Butz, A., & Bong, M. (2016). Cultural differences in the understanding of modelling and feedback as sources of self-efficacy information. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 112–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, L., Osborne, J., DeWitt, J., Dillon, J., Wong, B., & Willis, B. (2013). ASPIRES: Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10–14. London: King’s College London. Viewed 10 Sep 2016. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/aspires/ASPIRES-final-report-December-2013.pdf
  4. Baldwin, D. A., & Baird, J. A. (2001). Discerning intentions in dynamic human action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  8. Bernacki, M. L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Aleven, V. (2015). Examining self-efficacy during learning: variability and relations to behavior, performance, and learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary. In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  12. Boud D (1998) Assessment and learning—unlearning bad habits of assessment. Presentation to the conference Effective Assessment at University, University of Queensland 4-5 November, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butz, A. R., & Usher, E. L. (2015). Salient sources of self-efficacy in reading and mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrington, B., & McPhee, A. (2008). Boys ‘underachievement’ and the feminization of teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(2), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen, J. A., & Usher, E. L. (2013). Profiles of the sources of science self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheung, D. (2015). The combined effects of classroom teaching and learning strategy use on students’ chemistry self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 45(1), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cleary, T., & Chen, P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coates, J. (2004). Women, men and language (Third ed.). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
  21. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Crawford, M., & MacLeod, M. (1990). Gender in the college classroom: an assessment of the “chilly climate” for women. Sex Roles, 23(3–4), 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. DeWitt, J., & Archer, J. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170–2192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dreyfus, A. E. (2002). How are we doing? Steady growth in implementing peer-led team learning. Progressions: Peer-Led Team Learning, 3(3–4), 1–5.Google Scholar
  26. Eccles, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (1985). Classroom experiences and student gender: are there differences and do they matter. In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 79–114). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Epstein D, Elwood J, Hey V, &  Maw J (Eds.) (1998) Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2007). Cooperative learning. In P. A. Mabrouk (Ed.), Active learning: Models from the analytical sciences (pp. 34–53). ACS symposium series 970. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
  29. Fenning, B. E., & May, L. N. (2013). ‘Where there is a will, there is an A’: examining the roles of self-efficacy and self-concept in college students’ current educational attainment and career planning. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Francis, B. (2000). Boys, girls and achievement. London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  32. Francis, B., & Skelton, C. (2005). Reassessing gender and achievement. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gorard, S. (2012). Who is eligible for free school meals? Characterising free school meals as a measure of disadvantage in England. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 1003–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2009). The impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in science. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 93–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hargreaves, E. (2013). Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback: reconceptualising assessment for learning. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harlen, W. (2006). The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 61–80). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Hepler, T. J., & Feltz, D. L. (2012). Take the first heuristic, self-efficacy, and decision-making in sport. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 154.Google Scholar
  39. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.Google Scholar
  41. Hunter, D., Gambell, T., & B. Randhawa, B. (2005). Gender gaps in group listening and speaking: issues in social constructivist approaches to teaching and learning. Educational Review, 57(3), 329–355.Google Scholar
  42. Institute of Physics (2016) IOP Education: Policy and Projects. Viewed 18 Nov 2016. http://www.iop.org/publications/iop/2016/file_68327.pdf
  43. Jackson, C. (2002). ‘Laddishness’ as a self-worth protection strategy. Gender and Education, 14, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jackson, C. (2010). ‘I’ve been sort of laddish with them … one of the gang’: teachers’ perceptions of ‘laddish’ boys and how to deal with them. Gender and Education, 22(5), 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Joët, G., Usher, E. L., & Bressoux, P. (2011). Sources of self-efficacy: an investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 649–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klassen, R. M., & Usher, E. L. (2010). Self-efficacy in educational settings: recent research and emerging directions. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 16, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30(3), 347–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mackay, J., & Parkinson, J. (2010). Gender, self-efficacy and achievement among South African technology teacher trainees. Gender and Education, 22(1), 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  51. Nimmesgern, H. (2016). Why are women underrepresented in STEM fields? Chemistry: A European Journal, 22(11), 3529–3530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. OECD (2014) PISA 2012 results in focus: what 15-year-olds know and 2 what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD. Viewed 12 Sep 2016. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
  53. Ofsted (2015). A-level subject take-up: Numbers and proportions of girls and boys studying A-level subjects in England. Viewed 18 Nov 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/426646/A_level_subject_take-up.pdf
  54. Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: a synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 172–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. L. Maehr, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, 10, 1–49. Jai Press.Google Scholar
  56. Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: self-efficacy, self-concept and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  57. Pajares, F., Johnson, M. J., & Usher, E. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42, 104–120. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.Google Scholar
  58. Palmer, D. H. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36, 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Perry, B. L., Link, T., Boelter, C., & Leukefeld, C. (2012). Blinded to science: gender differences in the effects of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on academic and science attitudes among sixth graders. Gender & Education, 24(7), 725–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Sources of self-efficacy in academic contexts: a longitudinal perspective. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(4), 548–564.Google Scholar
  61. Phan, N., & Locke, T. (2016). Vietnamese teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching English as a foreign language: does culture matter? English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 15(1), 105–128.Google Scholar
  62. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reay, D. (2001). ‘Spice girls’, ‘nice girls’, ‘girlies’, and ‘tomboys’: gender discourses, girls’ cultures and femininities in the primary classroom. Gender and Education, 13(2), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ringrose, J. (2007). Successful girls? Complicating post-feminist, neoliberal discourses of educational achievement and gender equality. Gender and Education, 19, 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. RSC (2016) Campaign for specialist teaching. Royal Society for Chemistry. Viewed 20 Sep 2016. http://www.rsc.org/campaigning-outreach/campaigning/specialist-teaching/
  66. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: how America’s schools short change girls. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  67. Sadker, D., & Zittleman, K. (2009). Still failing at fairness: how gender bias cheats girls and boys in school and what we can do about it. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  68. Sahin, A., Gulacar, O., & Stuessy, C. (2015). High school students’ perceptions of the effects of international science Olympiad on their STEM career aspirations and twenty-first century skill development. Research in Science Education, 45(6), 785–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement: a self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sjøberg S, & Schreiner C (2010) The ROSE project: an overview and key findings. Oslo: University of Oslo, 1–31. Viewed 20th November 2016. http://www.cemf.ca/%5C/PDFs/SjobergSchreinerOverview2010.pdf
  72. Smith, E. (2003). Failing boys and moral panics: perspectives of the underachievement debate. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(3), 282–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Spear, M. G. (1987). Teachers’ views about the importance of science for boys and girls. In A. Kelly (Ed.), Science for girls? (pp. 52–57). Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2015). Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. Intelligence, 48, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Taras, M. (2010). Student self-assessment: processes and consequences. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tomas, L., Rigano, D., & Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Students’ regulation of their emotions in a science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 234–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tytler, R., & Osborne, J. (2012). Student attitudes and aspirations towards science. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 597–625). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Usher, E. L. (2009). Sources of middle school students’ self-efficacy in mathematics: a qualitative investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 275–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: a validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Language and thought. Ontario: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Webb, N. M. (1984). Sex differences in interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: a metaanalysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wellcome Trust (2013). The Deployment of Science and Maths Leaders in Primary Schools. A study for the Wellcome Trust. Viewed 10 June 2016. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtp056231_1.pdf
  86. Whitelaw, S., Milosevic, L., & Daniels, S. (2000). Gender, behaviour and attainment: a preliminary study of pupil perceptions and attitudes. Gender and Education, 12, 87–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wigfield, A., Muenks, K., & Rosenzweig, E. Q. (2015). Children’s achievement motivation in school. In C. M. Rubie-Davies, J. M. Stephens, & P. Watson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of social psychology of the classroom (pp. 9–20). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Wilkins, A. (2012). Push and pull in the classroom: competition, gender and the neoliberal subject. Gender and Education, 24(7), 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wilkinson, L. C., & Marrett, C. B. (1985). Gender influences in classroom interaction. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  91. Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research, 37, 215–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: an essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–30). Boca Raton, FL: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Education, Arts and Social Sciences, G1-38 School of EducationUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations