Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Science Self-Efficacy in the Primary Classroom: Using Mixed Methods to Investigate Sources of Self-Efficacy

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-efficacy has been shown to influence student engagement, effort and performance as well as course selection and future career choice. Extending our knowledge regarding the development of self-efficacy has important implications for educators and for those concerned about the international uptake of science careers. Previous research has identified four sources that may contribute towards self-efficacy: mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion and physiological/affective states. Very little research has been conducted within the school environment that looks at the formation of these sources and yet early school experiences have been posited to be a key factor in girls’ lack of engagement in post compulsory science education. This paper investigates children’s self-efficacy beliefs in science and reports on findings from mixed method research conducted with 182 children aged between 10 and 12 years. Classroom data were collected through focus groups, individual interviews and surveys. Findings revealed that although girls and boys held similar levels of academic performance in science, many girls underestimated their capability. The four sources of self-efficacy identified by Bandura (1997) plus self-regulation as an additional source, were evident in the children’s descriptions, with boys being more influenced by mastery experience and girls by a combination of vicarious experience and physiological/affective states. Girl’s appraisal of information appeared to operate through a heuristic process whereby girls disregarded salient information such as teacher feedback in favour of reliance on social comparison. Contextual factors were identified. Implications for science teachers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abele, A. F., & Spurk, D. (2009). The longitudinal impact of self-efficacy and career goals on objective and subjective career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, H. S., Usher, E. L., Butz, A., & Bong, M. (2016). Cultural differences in the understanding of modelling and feedback as sources of self-efficacy information. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 112–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L., Osborne, J., DeWitt, J., Dillon, J., Wong, B., & Willis, B. (2013). ASPIRES: Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10–14. London: King’s College London. Viewed 10 Sep 2016. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/aspires/ASPIRES-final-report-December-2013.pdf

  • Baldwin, D. A., & Baird, J. A. (2001). Discerning intentions in dynamic human action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernacki, M. L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Aleven, V. (2015). Examining self-efficacy during learning: variability and relations to behavior, performance, and learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary. In P. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 35–48). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud D (1998) Assessment and learning—unlearning bad habits of assessment. Presentation to the conference Effective Assessment at University, University of Queensland 4-5 November, 1998.

  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butz, A. R., & Usher, E. L. (2015). Salient sources of self-efficacy in reading and mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, B., & McPhee, A. (2008). Boys ‘underachievement’ and the feminization of teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(2), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. A., & Usher, E. L. (2013). Profiles of the sources of science self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, D. (2015). The combined effects of classroom teaching and learning strategy use on students’ chemistry self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 45(1), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T., & Chen, P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J. (2004). Women, men and language (Third ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & MacLeod, M. (1990). Gender in the college classroom: an assessment of the “chilly climate” for women. Sex Roles, 23(3–4), 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, J., & Archer, J. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170–2192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, A. E. (2002). How are we doing? Steady growth in implementing peer-led team learning. Progressions: Peer-Led Team Learning, 3(3–4), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (1985). Classroom experiences and student gender: are there differences and do they matter. In L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 79–114). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein D, Elwood J, Hey V, &  Maw J (Eds.) (1998) Failing boys? Issues in gender and achievement. Buckingham: Open University Press.

  • Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2007). Cooperative learning. In P. A. Mabrouk (Ed.), Active learning: Models from the analytical sciences (pp. 34–53). ACS symposium series 970. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenning, B. E., & May, L. N. (2013). ‘Where there is a will, there is an A’: examining the roles of self-efficacy and self-concept in college students’ current educational attainment and career planning. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), 635–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B. (2000). Boys, girls and achievement. London: Routledge/Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B., & Skelton, C. (2005). Reassessing gender and achievement. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S. (2012). Who is eligible for free school meals? Characterising free school meals as a measure of disadvantage in England. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 1003–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2009). The impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in science. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 93–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, E. (2013). Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback: reconceptualising assessment for learning. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (2006). The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 61–80). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepler, T. J., & Feltz, D. L. (2012). Take the first heuristic, self-efficacy, and decision-making in sport. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, D., Gambell, T., & B. Randhawa, B. (2005). Gender gaps in group listening and speaking: issues in social constructivist approaches to teaching and learning. Educational Review, 57(3), 329–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Physics (2016) IOP Education: Policy and Projects. Viewed 18 Nov 2016. http://www.iop.org/publications/iop/2016/file_68327.pdf

  • Jackson, C. (2002). ‘Laddishness’ as a self-worth protection strategy. Gender and Education, 14, 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. (2010). ‘I’ve been sort of laddish with them … one of the gang’: teachers’ perceptions of ‘laddish’ boys and how to deal with them. Gender and Education, 22(5), 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joët, G., Usher, E. L., & Bressoux, P. (2011). Sources of self-efficacy: an investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 649–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., & Usher, E. L. (2010). Self-efficacy in educational settings: recent research and emerging directions. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 16, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30(3), 347–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, J., & Parkinson, J. (2010). Gender, self-efficacy and achievement among South African technology teacher trainees. Gender and Education, 22(1), 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmesgern, H. (2016). Why are women underrepresented in STEM fields? Chemistry: A European Journal, 22(11), 3529–3530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014) PISA 2012 results in focus: what 15-year-olds know and 2 what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD. Viewed 12 Sep 2016. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf

  • Ofsted (2015). A-level subject take-up: Numbers and proportions of girls and boys studying A-level subjects in England. Viewed 18 Nov 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/426646/A_level_subject_take-up.pdf

  • Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: a synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 172–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. L. Maehr, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, 10, 1–49. Jai Press.

  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: self-efficacy, self-concept and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., Johnson, M. J., & Usher, E. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42, 104–120. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.

  • Palmer, D. H. (2006). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36, 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. L., Link, T., Boelter, C., & Leukefeld, C. (2012). Blinded to science: gender differences in the effects of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on academic and science attitudes among sixth graders. Gender & Education, 24(7), 725–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Sources of self-efficacy in academic contexts: a longitudinal perspective. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(4), 548–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, N., & Locke, T. (2016). Vietnamese teachers’ self-efficacy in teaching English as a foreign language: does culture matter? English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 15(1), 105–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2001). ‘Spice girls’, ‘nice girls’, ‘girlies’, and ‘tomboys’: gender discourses, girls’ cultures and femininities in the primary classroom. Gender and Education, 13(2), 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J. (2007). Successful girls? Complicating post-feminist, neoliberal discourses of educational achievement and gender equality. Gender and Education, 19, 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RSC (2016) Campaign for specialist teaching. Royal Society for Chemistry. Viewed 20 Sep 2016. http://www.rsc.org/campaigning-outreach/campaigning/specialist-teaching/

  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: how America’s schools short change girls. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, D., & Zittleman, K. (2009). Still failing at fairness: how gender bias cheats girls and boys in school and what we can do about it. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, A., Gulacar, O., & Stuessy, C. (2015). High school students’ perceptions of the effects of international science Olympiad on their STEM career aspirations and twenty-first century skill development. Research in Science Education, 45(6), 785–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement: a self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjøberg S, & Schreiner C (2010) The ROSE project: an overview and key findings. Oslo: University of Oslo, 1–31. Viewed 20th November 2016. http://www.cemf.ca/%5C/PDFs/SjobergSchreinerOverview2010.pdf

  • Smith, E. (2003). Failing boys and moral panics: perspectives of the underachievement debate. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(3), 282–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, M. G. (1987). Teachers’ views about the importance of science for boys and girls. In A. Kelly (Ed.), Science for girls? (pp. 52–57). Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2015). Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. Intelligence, 48, 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, M. (2010). Student self-assessment: processes and consequences. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomas, L., Rigano, D., & Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Students’ regulation of their emotions in a science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 234–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., & Osborne, J. (2012). Student attitudes and aspirations towards science. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 597–625). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L. (2009). Sources of middle school students’ self-efficacy in mathematics: a qualitative investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 275–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: a validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Language and thought. Ontario: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1984). Sex differences in interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: a metaanalysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellcome Trust (2013). The Deployment of Science and Maths Leaders in Primary Schools. A study for the Wellcome Trust. Viewed 10 June 2016. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtp056231_1.pdf

  • Whitelaw, S., Milosevic, L., & Daniels, S. (2000). Gender, behaviour and attainment: a preliminary study of pupil perceptions and attitudes. Gender and Education, 12, 87–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Muenks, K., & Rosenzweig, E. Q. (2015). Children’s achievement motivation in school. In C. M. Rubie-Davies, J. M. Stephens, & P. Watson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of social psychology of the classroom (pp. 9–20). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A. (2012). Push and pull in the classroom: competition, gender and the neoliberal subject. Gender and Education, 24(7), 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. C., & Marrett, C. B. (1985). Gender influences in classroom interaction. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research, 37, 215–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: a social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: an essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–30). Boca Raton, FL: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Education, Arts and Social Sciences, G1-38 School of Education, University of South Australia, Magill Campus, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia

    Jane Webb-Williams

Authors
  1. Jane Webb-Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Webb-Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Webb-Williams, J. Science Self-Efficacy in the Primary Classroom: Using Mixed Methods to Investigate Sources of Self-Efficacy. Res Sci Educ 48, 939–961 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9592-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9592-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation