Does the Demographic Objection to Epistocracy Succeed?
In most, if not all, forms of epistocracy, we can expect (at least in the near future) that the more advantaged demographic groups would have higher rates of representation than less advantaged groups. The Demographic Objection to Epistocracy holds that this means epistocracy is unjust. One version of the Demographic Objection holds that the unequal representation is inherently unfair. I show that this argument fails, as proceduralist concern for fairness does not get us to universal equal suffrage at all. A second version holds that by giving some kinds of people more power than others, epistocracy will tend to help the advantaged and harm the already disadvantaged. In contrast, I argue that certain forms of epistocracy escape this objection altogether. For the others, though, this version of the objection relies on questionable empirical assumptions. In the end, neither version of the Demographic Objection succeeds. The Demographic Objection to epistocracy is much weaker than it seems.
KeywordsEpistocracy Democracy Race Socio-economic status Rational ignorance Representation
- Caplan, Bryan. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Christiano, Thomas. 1996. The Rule of the Many. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
- Citrin, Jack, and Donald Green. 1990. The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion. Research in Micropolitics 3: 1–28.Google Scholar
- Delli-Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Enns, Peter K. and Christopher Wlezien (eds.). 2011. Who Gets Represented?, 2011. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Estlund, David. 2008. Democratic Authority. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Mill, John Stuart. 1991 . Considerations on Representative Government. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
- Mulligan, Thomas. 2017a. Justice and the Meritocratic State. New York, NY: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
- Sears, David O., and Carolyn L. Funk. 1990. Self-Interest in Americans’ Political Opinions. In Beyond Self-Interest, ed. Jane Mansbridge, 147–170. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Somin, Ilya. 2013. The Problem of Political Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar