Res Publica

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 495–511 | Cite as

Misinformation as Immigration Control

Article
  • 269 Downloads

Abstract

It is wrong to force refugees to return to the countries they fled from. It is similarly wrong, many argue, to force migrants back to countries with life-threatening conditions. I argue that it is additionally wrong to help such refugees and migrants voluntarily return whilst failing to inform them of the risks. Drawing on existing data, and original data from East Africa, I describe distinct types of cases where such a wrong arises. In ‘Misinformation Cases’ officials tell refugees that it is safe to return, when it is not, and refugees return who would have otherwise stayed. In ‘Omission Cases’ officials do not provide any information on countries of origin, and this omission causes refugees to repatriate. In ‘Relevancy Cases’ refugees are misinformed or uninformed, but would have returned even if better informed. In all of these cases, at least some state officials are blameworthy for their failure to inform refugees, and are engaging in a form of wrongful immigration control.

Keywords

Immigration Refugees Informed consent Deportation Repatriation 

References

  1. Al Jazeera. 2011. ‘Hundreds dead’ in South Sudan cattle raids. 22 August 2011, downloaded 10 January 2014 from http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2011/08/201182220946583842.html.
  2. Athanassoulis, Nafsika. 2000. A response to Harman: Virtue ethics and character traits. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series 100: 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, Michael. 2001. UNHCR and the ethics of repatriation. Forced Migration Review 10: 31–34.Google Scholar
  4. Barry, Christian, and Gerhard Overland. 2012. How much for the child? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, Jonathan. 1998. The act itself. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Betts, Alexander. 2010. Survival migration: A new protection framework. Global Governance 16(3): 361–382.Google Scholar
  7. Bradley, Megan. 2013. Refugee repatriation: Justice, responsibility, and redress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, Tim. 2006. South Sudan education emergency. Forced Migration Review (supplement): 20–21. Available at http://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/FMRpdfs/EducationSupplement/13.pdf.
  9. Cometto, Giorgio, Gyuri Fritsche, and Egbert Sondorp. 2010. Health sector recovery in early post-conflict environments: Experience from southern Sudan. Disasters 34(4): 885–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callahan, Daniel. 1989. Killing and allowing to die. The Hastings Center Report 19: 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carr, Helen. 2014. Returning ‘home’: Experiences of reintegration for asylum seekers and refugees. British Journal of Social Work 44: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chimni, B.S. 2004. From repatriation to involuntary repatriation: Towards a critical history of durable solutions to refugee problems. Refugee Survey Quarterly 23(3): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ECtHR–Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy [GC], Application No. 27765/09.Google Scholar
  14. Fouda, Lauren. 2007. Compulsory voluntary repatriation: Why temporary protection for Sudanese asylum-seekers in Cairo amounts to refoulement. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law 10(3): 511–538.Google Scholar
  15. Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas. 2011. Access to asylum: International refugee law and the globalization of migration control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geneva Convention for the Protection of Refugees. http://www.unhcr.org/protect/PROTECTION/3b66c2aa10.pdf.
  17. Gerver, Mollie. 2014. Testing repatriation contracts for unconscionability: The case of refugees in Israel. International Journal of Refugee Law 26(2): 198–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerver, Mollie. Refugee repatriation and the problem of consent. British Journal of Political Science (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  19. Gibney, Matthew. 2004. The ethics and politics of asylum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goren, Yuval (Hebrew) Aid organizations: More than 22 refugees expelled to South Sudan killed this year. Maariv 5/6/2013.Google Scholar
  21. Green, Andrew. 2012. Healthcare in South Sudan at a crossroads. The Lancet 379(9826): 1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Groll, Daniel. 2012. Paternalism, respect, and the will. Ethics 122(4): 692–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hidalgo, Javier. 2015. Resistance to unjust immigration restrictions. Journal of Political Philosophy. 23(4): 450–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Howard-Snyder, Frances. 2011. Doing versus allowing harm. In The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (Winter 2011 Edition) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/doing-allowing/.
  25. Jackson, Frank. 1997. What Effects? In Reading parfit, ed. Jonathan Dancy. Oxford: Blackwell Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Ferrie, Jared. 2012a. More Than 200 Die in South Sudan Tribal Feud, Official Says. CNN. 12 March 2012 http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/12/world/africa/south-sudan-violence/.
  27. Ferrie, Jared. 2012b. More Than 200 Die in South Sudan Tribal Feud, Official Says. CNN. 12 March 2012 http://edition.cnn.com/2012/03/12/world/africa/south-sudan-violence/.
  28. Lemberg-Pedersen, Martin. 2015. The rise and fall of the ERPUM pilot: Tracing the European policy drive to deport unaccompanied minors. Refugee Studies Centre working paper no. 108.Google Scholar
  29. Long, Katy. 2013. The point of no return: Refugees, rights, and repatriation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manson, Neil, and O’Neill Onora. 2007. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, David. 2005. Immigration: The case for its limits. In Contemporary debates in applied ethics, ed. A. Cohen, and C. Wellman, 193–204. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, David. 2007. National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, Frankiln, and Alan Wertheimer. 2009. Preface to a theory of consent transactions: Beyond valid consent. In The ethics of consent: Theory and practice, ed. Franklin Miller, and Alan Wertheimer, 79–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morris, Helen and Michael Salomons. 2013. Difficult Decisions: A review of UNHCR’s engagement with Assisted Voluntary Return programs. UNHCR Policy Development and Evaluation Services.Google Scholar
  35. MSF. 2014. South Sudan: Violence against healthcare. 1 July http://www.msf.fr/actualite/publications/south-sudan-conflict-violence-against-healthcare.
  36. Osman v. United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, Application N. 23452/94, 28 October 1998, para. 1.Google Scholar
  37. Riiskjaer, Maria Helene Bak and T. Nielsson. 2008. Circular repatriation: The unsuccessful return and reintegration with refugee status in Denmark. Research Paper 165, New Issues in Refugee Research.Google Scholar
  38. Schuster, Liza, and Nassim Majidi. 2013. What happens post-deportation? The experience of deported Afghans. Migration Studies 1(2): 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singer, Peter. 2015. The most good you can do. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Slote, Michael. 2001. Morals from motives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Small Arms Survey. 2011. Fighting for spoils: Armed insurgencies in Greater Upper Nile. November 2011. http://www.smallarmssurveysudan.org/fileadmin/docs/issue-briefs/HSBA-IB-18-Armed-insurgencies-Greater-Upper-Nile.pdf.
  42. Smith, Holly. 2011. Non-tracing cases of culpable ignorance. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5(2): 115–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, Holly. 2014a. Negligence. In The international encyclopaedia of ethics, ed. Hugh LaFollette. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, Holly. 2014b. The subjective moral duty to inform oneself before acting. Ethics 125(1): 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strand, Arne. 2011. Review of two societies: Review of the Information, Return and Reintegration of Iraqi Nationals to Iraq (IRRINI) program. Chr. Michelson Institute. http://www.cmi.no/publications/publication/?4155=between-two-societies-review-of-the-information.
  46. Tognazzini, Neal and D. Justin Coates, 2016. Blame. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta.Google Scholar
  47. UNHCR. 2012. UNHCR. 2012. Displacement: The New 21st Century Problem. Available from http://www.unhcr.org.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/UNHCR_Global_Trends_2012.pdf, accessed October 2014.
  48. United Nations. 2005. The Responsibility to Protect. Outcome Document of the 2005 United Nations World Summit, A/RES/60/1, para. 138-140, http://www.un.org/en/preventgenocide/adviser/responsibility.shtml.
  49. Van England-Nouri, Anisseh. 2008. Repatriation of Afghan and Iraqi refugees from Iran. International Journal on Multicultural Societies 10(2): 144–169.Google Scholar
  50. Waldron, Jeremy. 1987. Theoretical foundations of liberalism. The Philosophical Quarterly 37: 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walsh, Martha, Richard Black, and Khalid Koser. 1999. Repatriation from the European Union to Bosnia Herzegovino: The role of information. In The end of the refugee cycle? Refugee repatriation and reconstruction, ed. Richard Black, and Khalid Koser, 110–125. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  52. World Bank. 2014. Unemployment, total (% of total labour force) (modelled ILO estimate). downloaded on 15 June 2015 from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations