Advertisement

Megill’s multiverse meta-argument

  • Klaas J. Kraay
Article

Abstract

In a recent paper in this journal, Jason Megill (2011) offers an innovative meta-argument which deploys considerations about multiple universes in an effort to block all arguments from evil. In what follows, I contend that Megill has failed to establish a key premise in his meta-argument. I also offer a rival account of the effect of multiverse models on the debate about evil.

Keywords

God Evil World Universe Multiverse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams M. (1999) Horrendous evils and the goodness of God. Melbourne University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida M. (2008) The metaphysics of perfect beings. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida M. (2010) O’Connor’s permissive universe. Philosophia Christi 12: 296–307Google Scholar
  4. Draper P. (2004) Cosmic fine-tuning and terrestrial suffering: Parallel problems for naturalism and theism. American Philosophical Quarterly 41: 311–321Google Scholar
  5. Forrest P. (1981) The problem of evil: two neglected defences. Sophia 20: 49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forrest P. (1996) God without the supernatural. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 213–236Google Scholar
  7. Hasker W. (1992) The necessity of gratuitous evil. Faith and Philosophy 9: 23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hick J. (1973) Evil and the God of love (2nd ed.). MacMillan Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Hudson H. (2006) The metaphysics of hyperspace. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Jordan J. (2004) Divine love and human suffering. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56: 169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kraay, K. (forthcoming). The theistic multiverse: Problems and prospects. In: Y. Nagasawa (Eds.), Scientific approaches to the philosophy of religion. Houndsmills: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  12. Kraay K. (2010) Theism, possible worlds, and the multiverse. Philosophical Studies 147: 355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kraay K. (2011) Theism and modal collapse. American Philosophical Quarterly 48: 361–372Google Scholar
  14. Leslie J. (1989) Universes. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. McHarry J. D. (1978) A Theodicy. Analysis 38: 132–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Megill J. (2011) Evil and the many universes response. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 70: 127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Monton, B. (forthcoming). Against multiverse theodicies. Philo.Google Scholar
  18. O’Connor T. (2008) Theism and ultimate explanation: The necessary shape of contingency. Wiley-Blackwell, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  19. Parfit D. (1991) Why does the universe exist? Harvard Review of Philosophy. Spring, New Orleans, pp 4–5Google Scholar
  20. Parfit D. (1992) The puzzle of reality: Why does the universe exist? Times Literary Supplement, July 3, reprinted in P. van Inwagen, D. Zimmerman (Eds.) (1988). Metaphysics: The big questions. Oxford: Blackwell, 418–427.Google Scholar
  21. Perkins R. K. (1980) McHarry’s theodicy: A reply. Analysis 40: 168–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peterson M. (1982) Evil and the Christian God. Baker Book House, Grand RapidsGoogle Scholar
  23. Rowe W. (1996) William Alston on the problem of evil. In: Senor T. D. (Ed.), The rationality of belief and the plurality of faith.. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 71–93Google Scholar
  24. Stewart M. (1993) The greater good defence: An essay on the rationality of faith. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Swinburne R. (1998) Providence and the problem of evil. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tooley M. (1991) The argument from evil. Philosophical Perspectives 5: 360–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turner D. (2003) The many-universes solution to the problem of evil. In: Gale R., Pruss A. (Eds.), The existence of god. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  28. van Inwagen P. (2006) The problem of evil. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walker M. (2009) The anthropic argument against the existence of God. Sophia 48: 351–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yandell K. (1989) Gratuitous evil and divine existence. Religious Studies 25: 15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations