# Lifecycle-consistent female labor supply with nonlinear taxes: evidence from unobserved effects panel data models with censoring, selection and endogeneity

- 253 Downloads
- 2 Citations

## Abstract

This paper uses the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) from 1979 to 2007 to estimate within-period lifecycle-consistent labor supply elasticities of US females in a two-stage budgeting framework. The paper combines a variety of econometric approaches to estimate unobserved effects panel data models with censoring, selection and endogeneity. The paper finds evidence of substantial upward bias in estimated wage elasticities from pooled panel models which do not account for unobserved effects, as fixed effects and correlated random effects (CRE) specifications yield smaller elasticities. Estimates are also somewhat sensitive to using a lifecycle-consistent specification versus a standard static model. The lifecycle-consistent wage elasticity from a CRE model with instrumental variables is 0.56 on the extensive margin and 0.31 on the intensive margin for an overall wage elasticity of 0.87. The standard static model, on the other hand, yields a wage elasticity of 0.46 on the extensive margin and 0.13 on the intensive margin for an overall elasticity of 0.59.

## Keywords

Taxes and female labor supply Lifecycle labor supply Fixed effects models with censoring Selection Endogeneity## JEL Classification

J22 H24 C14 C23 C24## Notes

### Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Gary Engelhardt for his constant encouragement and generous support during this research. I thank Sonia Oreffice, Soren Blomquist, Monica Singhal, Tom Kniesner, Dan Black, Duke Kao, Jeffrey Kubik, Jan Ondrich, Michael Weiss, two anonymous referees and seminar participants at Syracuse University, Miami University, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, RAND Corporation, Institute of Social Research at the University of Michigan, conference participants at the 17th Annual Meetings of the Society of Labor Economists (SOLE) in Chicago, 99th Annual Conference on Taxation in Boston, and the 13th International Panel Data Conference in Cambridge, England for helpful discussions and insightful comments on previous versions.

## References

- Altonji, J. G. (1986). Intertemporal substitution in labor supply: Evidence from micro data.
*Journal of Political Economy,**94*, S176–S215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Andersen, E. B. (1970). Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum-likelihood estimators.
*Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B*,*32*, 283–301.Google Scholar - Angrist, J. D. (1991). Grouped-data estimation and testing in simple labor-supply models.
*Journal of Econometrics,**47*, 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Aronsson, T., & Wikström, M. (1994). Nonlinear taxes in a life-cycle consistent model of family labour supply.
*Empirical Economics,**19*, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). Changes in the labor supply behavior of married women: 1980–2000.
*Journal of Labor Economics,**25*, 393–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blomquist, N. S. (1985). Labour supply in a two-period model: The effect of a nonlinear progressive income tax.
*Review of Economic Studies,**52*, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blomquist, N. S., & Hansson-Brusewitz, U. (1990). The effect of taxes on male and female labor supply in Sweden.
*Journal of Human Resources,**25*, 317–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blomquist, S., & Newey, W. (2002). Nonparametric estimation with nonlinear budget sets.
*Econometrica,**70*, 2455–2480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blundell, R., Duncan, A., & Meghir, C. (1998). Estimating labor supply responses using tax reforms.
*Econometrica,**66*, 827–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blundell, R., & Macurdy, T. (1999). Labor supply: A review of alternative approaches. In
*Handbook of labor economics*(Vol. 3A, pp. 1559–1695). North-Holland: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar - Blundell, R., Meghir, C., & Neves, P. (1993). Labour supply and intertemporal substitution.
*Journal of Econometrics,**59*, 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blundell, R. W., & Powell, J. L. (2004). Endogeneity in semiparametric binary response models.
*Review of Economic Studies,**71*, 655–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blundell, R., & Walker, I. (1986). A life-cycle consistent empirical model of family labour supply using cross-section data.
*Review of Economic Studies,**53*, 539–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Browning, E. K. (1987). On the marginal welfare cost of taxation.
*The American Economic Review*,*77*(1), 11–23.Google Scholar - Browning, M. (2005). A working paper from April 1985: Which demand elasticities do we know and which do we need to know for policy analysis?
*Research in Economics,**59*(4), 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Burkhauser, R. V., Butrica, B. A., Daly, M. C., & Lillard, D. R. (2001). The cross-national equivalent file: A product of cross-national research.
*Soziale Sicherung in Einer Dynamischen Gesellschaft. Festschrift Für Richard Hauser Zum, 65*, 354–376.Google Scholar - Burtless, G., & Hausman, J. A. (1978). The effect of taxation on labor supply: Evaluating the gary negative income tax experiments.
*Journal of Political Economy,**86*, 1103–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chamberlain, G. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data.
*Review of Economic Studies*,*47*, 225–238.Google Scholar - Charlier, E., Melenberg, B., & van Soest, A. (2001). An analysis of housing expenditure using semiparametric models and panel data.
*Journal of Econometrics,**101*, 71–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cherchye, L., & Vermeulen, F. (2008). Nonparametric analysis of household labor supply: Goodness of fit and power of the unitary and the collective model.
*Review of Economics and Statistics,**90*, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chernozhukov, V., Fernandez-Val, I., Hahn, J., & Newey, W. (2009).
*Identification and estimation of marginal effects in nonlinear panel models*. Department of Economics, Boston University, Working Papers Series: wp2009-b.Google Scholar - Chetty, R. (2012). Bounds on elasticities with optimization frictions: A synthesis of micro and macro evidence on labor supply.
*Econometrica,**80*(3), 969–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chiappori, P.-A. (1988). Rational household labor supply.
*Econometrica,**56*, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Devereux, P. J. (2004). Changes in relative wages and family labor supply.
*Journal of Human Resources,**39*, 696–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eckstein, Z., & Wolpin, K. I. (1989). Dynamic labour force participation of married women and endogenous work experience.
*Review of Economic Studies,**56*, 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eissa, N. (1995).
*Taxation and labor supply of married women: The tax reform act of 1986 as a natural experiment*. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers: 5023.Google Scholar - Eissa, N., & Hoynes, H. W. (2004). Taxes and the labor market participation of married couples: The earned income tax credit.
*Journal of Public Economics,**88*, 1931–1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eissa, N., Kleven, H. J., & Kreiner, C. T. (2008). Evaluation of four tax reforms in the United States: Labor supply and welfare effects for single mothers.
*Journal of Public Economics,**92*, 795–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eklof, M., & Sacklen, H. (2000). The hausman-macurdy controversy: Why do the results differ across studies? Comment.
*Journal of Human Resources,**35*, 204–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Engelhardt, G. V., & Kumar, A. (2007). Employer matching and 401(k) saving: Evidence from the health and retirement study.
*Journal of Public Economics,**91*, 1920–1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Feenberg, D., & Coutts, E. (1993). An introduction to the TAXSIM model.
*Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,**12*, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gelber, A. M., & Mitchell, J. W. (2011).
*Taxes and time allocation: Evidence from single women and men*.Google Scholar - Guner, N., Kaygusuz, R., & Ventura, G. (2012). Taxation and household labour supply.
*The Review of Economic Studies,**79*, 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hall, R. E. (1973). Wages, income, and hours of work in the U.S. labor force. In G. Cain & H. Watts (Eds.),
*Income maintenance and labor supply*. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar - Harberger, A. T. (1964).
*Resource allocation, and welfare*. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar - Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics.
*Econometrica,**46*(1251–127), 1.Google Scholar - Hausman, J. A. (1980). The effect of wages, taxes, and fixed costs on women’s labor force participation.
*Journal of Public Economics,**14*, 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hausman, J. (1981).
*Labor supply: How taxes affect economic behavior*. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar - Hausman, J., & Ruud, P. (1984). Family labor supply with taxes.
*American Economic Review,**74*, 242–248.Google Scholar - Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error.
*Econometrica,**47*, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Heckman, J. J., & Macurdy, T. E. (1980). A life cycle model of female labour supply.
*Review of Economic Studies,**47*, 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Heim, B. T. (2007). The incredible shrinking elasticities: Married female labor supply, 1978–2002.
*Journal of Human Resources,**42*, 881–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Heim, B. T. (2009). Structural estimation of family labor supply with taxes: Estimating a continuous hours model using a direct utility specification.
*Journal of Human Resources,**44*, 350–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Imai, S., & Keane, M. P. (2004). Intertemporal labor supply and human capital accumulation.
*International Economic Review,**45*, 601–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jakubson, G. (1988). The sensitivity of labor-supply parameter estimates to unobserved individual effects: Fixed- and random-effects estimates in a nonlinear model using panel data.
*Journal of Labor Economics,**6*, 302–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Johnson, T. R., & Pencavel, J. H. (1984). Dynamic hours of work functions for husbands, wives, and single females.
*Econometrica,**52*, 363–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Juhn, C., & Potter, S. (2006). Changes in labor force participation in the United States.
*Journal of Economic Perspectives,**20*, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Keane, M. P. (2011).
*Human capital, taxes and labour supply*. Economic Record.Google Scholar - Killingsworth, M. R., & Heckman, J. J. (1986). Female labor supply: A survey. In
*Handbook of labor economics*(Vol. 1, pp. 103–204). North-Holland; distributed in North America by Elsevier Science, New York.Google Scholar - Kimmel, J., & Kniesner, T. J. (1998). New evidence on labor supply: Employment versus hours elasticities by sex and marital status.
*Journal of Monetary Economics,**42*, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kumar, A. (2008). Labor supply, deadweight loss and tax reform act of 1986: A nonparametric evaluation using panel data.
*Journal of Public Economics,**92*, 236–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kumar, A. (2010). Nonparametric estimation of the impact of taxes on female labor supply.
*Journal of Applied Econometrics*,*27*(3), 415–439.Google Scholar - Kyriazidou, E. (1997). Estimation of a panel data sample selection model.
*Econometrica,**65*, 1335–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Liang, C. Y. (2011). Nonparametric structural estimation of labor supply in the presence of censoring.
*Journal of Public Economics*,*96*(1), 89–103.Google Scholar - Lilja, R. (1986).
*Econometric analyses of family labour supply over the life cycle using US*. Helsinki School of Economics.Google Scholar - Lundberg, S. J. (1988). Labor supply of husbands and wives: A simultaneous equations approach.
*Review of Economics and Statistics,**70*, 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Macunovich, D. J., & Pegula, S. (2010). Reversals in the patterns of women’s labor supply in the United States, 1977–2009.
*Monthly Labor Review*,*133*, 16–36.Google Scholar - MaCurdy, T. E. (1981). An empirical model of labor supply in a life-cycle setting.
*Journal of Political Economy,**89*, 1059–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - MaCurdy, T. E. (1983). A simple scheme for estimating an intertemporal model of labor supply and consumption in the presence of taxes and uncertainty.
*International Economic Review,**24*, 265–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - MaCurdy, T., Green, D., & Paarsch, H. J. (1990). Assessing empirical approaches for analyzing taxes and labor supply.
*Journal of Human Resources,**25*, 415–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Meyer, B. D., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2001). Welfare, the earned income tax credit, and the labor supply of single mothers.
*Quarterly Journal of Economics,**116*, 1063–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Moffitt, R. (1984). The estimation of a joint wage-hours labor supply model.
*Journal of Labor Economics,**2*, 550–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mroz, T. A. (1987). The sensitivity of an empirical model of married women’s hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions.
*Econometrica,**55*, 765–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations.
*Econometrica,**16*, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2008). Data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates.
*Journal of Econometrics,**145*, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Saez, E., Slemrod, J., & Giertz, S. H. (2012). The elasticity of taxable income with respect to marginal tax rates: A critical review.
*Journal of Economic Literature*,*50*(1), 3–50.Google Scholar - Semykina, A., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Estimating panel data models in the presence of endogeneity and selection.
*Journal of Econometrics,**157*, 375–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Stock, J., & Watson, H. (2007).
*Introduction to econometrics*. Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.Google Scholar - Triest, R. K. (1990). The effect of income taxation on labor supply in the United States.
*Journal of Human Resources,**25*, 491–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - van Soest, A., Woittiez, I., & Kapteyn, A. (1990). Labor supply, income taxes, and hours restrictions in The Netherlands.
*Journal of Human Resources,**25*, 517–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wooldridge, J. M. (2009).
*Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels*. Manuscript (version July 2009) Michigan State University.Google Scholar - Wooldridge, J. M. (2010).
*Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data*. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar - Zabel, J. E. (1997). Estimating wage elasticities for life-cycle models of labor supply behavior.
*Labour Economics,**4*, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ziliak, J. P., & Kniesner, T. J. (1999). Estimating life cycle labor supply tax effects.
*Journal of Political Economy,**107*, 326–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar