Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 207–229 | Cite as

Lifecycle-consistent female labor supply with nonlinear taxes: evidence from unobserved effects panel data models with censoring, selection and endogeneity

  • Anil Kumar
Article

Abstract

This paper uses the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) from 1979 to 2007 to estimate within-period lifecycle-consistent labor supply elasticities of US females in a two-stage budgeting framework. The paper combines a variety of econometric approaches to estimate unobserved effects panel data models with censoring, selection and endogeneity. The paper finds evidence of substantial upward bias in estimated wage elasticities from pooled panel models which do not account for unobserved effects, as fixed effects and correlated random effects (CRE) specifications yield smaller elasticities. Estimates are also somewhat sensitive to using a lifecycle-consistent specification versus a standard static model. The lifecycle-consistent wage elasticity from a CRE model with instrumental variables is 0.56 on the extensive margin and 0.31 on the intensive margin for an overall wage elasticity of 0.87. The standard static model, on the other hand, yields a wage elasticity of 0.46 on the extensive margin and 0.13 on the intensive margin for an overall elasticity of 0.59.

Keywords

Taxes and female labor supply Lifecycle labor supply Fixed effects models with censoring Selection Endogeneity 

JEL Classification

J22 H24 C14 C23 C24 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Gary Engelhardt for his constant encouragement and generous support during this research. I thank Sonia Oreffice, Soren Blomquist, Monica Singhal, Tom Kniesner, Dan Black, Duke Kao, Jeffrey Kubik, Jan Ondrich, Michael Weiss, two anonymous referees and seminar participants at Syracuse University, Miami University, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, RAND Corporation, Institute of Social Research at the University of Michigan, conference participants at the 17th Annual Meetings of the Society of Labor Economists (SOLE) in Chicago, 99th Annual Conference on Taxation in Boston, and the 13th International Panel Data Conference in Cambridge, England for helpful discussions and insightful comments on previous versions.

References

  1. Altonji, J. G. (1986). Intertemporal substitution in labor supply: Evidence from micro data. Journal of Political Economy, 94, S176–S215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, E. B. (1970). Asymptotic properties of conditional maximum-likelihood estimators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 32, 283–301.Google Scholar
  3. Angrist, J. D. (1991). Grouped-data estimation and testing in simple labor-supply models. Journal of Econometrics, 47, 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aronsson, T., & Wikström, M. (1994). Nonlinear taxes in a life-cycle consistent model of family labour supply. Empirical Economics, 19, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). Changes in the labor supply behavior of married women: 1980–2000. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 393–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blomquist, N. S. (1985). Labour supply in a two-period model: The effect of a nonlinear progressive income tax. Review of Economic Studies, 52, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blomquist, N. S., & Hansson-Brusewitz, U. (1990). The effect of taxes on male and female labor supply in Sweden. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 317–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blomquist, S., & Newey, W. (2002). Nonparametric estimation with nonlinear budget sets. Econometrica, 70, 2455–2480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blundell, R., Duncan, A., & Meghir, C. (1998). Estimating labor supply responses using tax reforms. Econometrica, 66, 827–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blundell, R., & Macurdy, T. (1999). Labor supply: A review of alternative approaches. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3A, pp. 1559–1695). North-Holland: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  11. Blundell, R., Meghir, C., & Neves, P. (1993). Labour supply and intertemporal substitution. Journal of Econometrics, 59, 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blundell, R. W., & Powell, J. L. (2004). Endogeneity in semiparametric binary response models. Review of Economic Studies, 71, 655–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blundell, R., & Walker, I. (1986). A life-cycle consistent empirical model of family labour supply using cross-section data. Review of Economic Studies, 53, 539–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Browning, E. K. (1987). On the marginal welfare cost of taxation. The American Economic Review, 77(1), 11–23.Google Scholar
  15. Browning, M. (2005). A working paper from April 1985: Which demand elasticities do we know and which do we need to know for policy analysis? Research in Economics, 59(4), 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burkhauser, R. V., Butrica, B. A., Daly, M. C., & Lillard, D. R. (2001). The cross-national equivalent file: A product of cross-national research. Soziale Sicherung in Einer Dynamischen Gesellschaft. Festschrift Für Richard Hauser Zum, 65, 354–376.Google Scholar
  17. Burtless, G., & Hausman, J. A. (1978). The effect of taxation on labor supply: Evaluating the gary negative income tax experiments. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 1103–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chamberlain, G. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 225–238.Google Scholar
  19. Charlier, E., Melenberg, B., & van Soest, A. (2001). An analysis of housing expenditure using semiparametric models and panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 101, 71–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cherchye, L., & Vermeulen, F. (2008). Nonparametric analysis of household labor supply: Goodness of fit and power of the unitary and the collective model. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chernozhukov, V., Fernandez-Val, I., Hahn, J., & Newey, W. (2009). Identification and estimation of marginal effects in nonlinear panel models. Department of Economics, Boston University, Working Papers Series: wp2009-b.Google Scholar
  22. Chetty, R. (2012). Bounds on elasticities with optimization frictions: A synthesis of micro and macro evidence on labor supply. Econometrica, 80(3), 969–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chiappori, P.-A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica, 56, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cogan, J. F. (1981). Fixed costs and labor supply. Econometrica, 49(945–96), 3.Google Scholar
  25. Devereux, P. J. (2004). Changes in relative wages and family labor supply. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 696–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eckstein, Z., & Wolpin, K. I. (1989). Dynamic labour force participation of married women and endogenous work experience. Review of Economic Studies, 56, 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eissa, N. (1995). Taxation and labor supply of married women: The tax reform act of 1986 as a natural experiment. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers: 5023.Google Scholar
  28. Eissa, N., & Hoynes, H. W. (2004). Taxes and the labor market participation of married couples: The earned income tax credit. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1931–1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eissa, N., Kleven, H. J., & Kreiner, C. T. (2008). Evaluation of four tax reforms in the United States: Labor supply and welfare effects for single mothers. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 795–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eklof, M., & Sacklen, H. (2000). The hausman-macurdy controversy: Why do the results differ across studies? Comment. Journal of Human Resources, 35, 204–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Engelhardt, G. V., & Kumar, A. (2007). Employer matching and 401(k) saving: Evidence from the health and retirement study. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1920–1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Feenberg, D., & Coutts, E. (1993). An introduction to the TAXSIM model. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gelber, A. M., & Mitchell, J. W. (2011). Taxes and time allocation: Evidence from single women and men.Google Scholar
  34. Gorman, W. M. (1959). Separable utility and aggregation. Econometrica, 27(469–48), 1.Google Scholar
  35. Guner, N., Kaygusuz, R., & Ventura, G. (2012). Taxation and household labour supply. The Review of Economic Studies, 79, 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hall, R. E. (1973). Wages, income, and hours of work in the U.S. labor force. In G. Cain & H. Watts (Eds.), Income maintenance and labor supply. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
  37. Harberger, A. T. (1964). Resource allocation, and welfare. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(1251–127), 1.Google Scholar
  39. Hausman, J. A. (1980). The effect of wages, taxes, and fixed costs on women’s labor force participation. Journal of Public Economics, 14, 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hausman, J. (1981). Labor supply: How taxes affect economic behavior. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  41. Hausman, J., & Ruud, P. (1984). Family labor supply with taxes. American Economic Review, 74, 242–248.Google Scholar
  42. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heckman, J. J., & Macurdy, T. E. (1980). A life cycle model of female labour supply. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heim, B. T. (2007). The incredible shrinking elasticities: Married female labor supply, 1978–2002. Journal of Human Resources, 42, 881–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Heim, B. T. (2009). Structural estimation of family labor supply with taxes: Estimating a continuous hours model using a direct utility specification. Journal of Human Resources, 44, 350–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Imai, S., & Keane, M. P. (2004). Intertemporal labor supply and human capital accumulation. International Economic Review, 45, 601–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jakubson, G. (1988). The sensitivity of labor-supply parameter estimates to unobserved individual effects: Fixed- and random-effects estimates in a nonlinear model using panel data. Journal of Labor Economics, 6, 302–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnson, T. R., & Pencavel, J. H. (1984). Dynamic hours of work functions for husbands, wives, and single females. Econometrica, 52, 363–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Juhn, C., & Potter, S. (2006). Changes in labor force participation in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keane, M. P. (2011). Human capital, taxes and labour supply. Economic Record.Google Scholar
  51. Killingsworth, M. R., & Heckman, J. J. (1986). Female labor supply: A survey. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 1, pp. 103–204). North-Holland; distributed in North America by Elsevier Science, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Kimmel, J., & Kniesner, T. J. (1998). New evidence on labor supply: Employment versus hours elasticities by sex and marital status. Journal of Monetary Economics, 42, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kumar, A. (2008). Labor supply, deadweight loss and tax reform act of 1986: A nonparametric evaluation using panel data. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 236–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kumar, A. (2010). Nonparametric estimation of the impact of taxes on female labor supply. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27(3), 415–439.Google Scholar
  55. Kyriazidou, E. (1997). Estimation of a panel data sample selection model. Econometrica, 65, 1335–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Liang, C. Y. (2011). Nonparametric structural estimation of labor supply in the presence of censoring. Journal of Public Economics, 96(1), 89–103.Google Scholar
  57. Lilja, R. (1986). Econometric analyses of family labour supply over the life cycle using US. Helsinki School of Economics.Google Scholar
  58. Lundberg, S. J. (1988). Labor supply of husbands and wives: A simultaneous equations approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Macunovich, D. J., & Pegula, S. (2010). Reversals in the patterns of women’s labor supply in the United States, 1977–2009. Monthly Labor Review, 133, 16–36.Google Scholar
  60. MaCurdy, T. E. (1981). An empirical model of labor supply in a life-cycle setting. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 1059–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. MaCurdy, T. E. (1983). A simple scheme for estimating an intertemporal model of labor supply and consumption in the presence of taxes and uncertainty. International Economic Review, 24, 265–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. MaCurdy, T., Green, D., & Paarsch, H. J. (1990). Assessing empirical approaches for analyzing taxes and labor supply. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 415–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Meyer, B. D., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2001). Welfare, the earned income tax credit, and the labor supply of single mothers. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1063–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moffitt, R. (1984). The estimation of a joint wage-hours labor supply model. Journal of Labor Economics, 2, 550–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mroz, T. A. (1987). The sensitivity of an empirical model of married women’s hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions. Econometrica, 55, 765–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Neyman, J., & Scott, E. L. (1948). Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica, 16, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2008). Data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics, 145, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Saez, E., Slemrod, J., & Giertz, S. H. (2012). The elasticity of taxable income with respect to marginal tax rates: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 3–50.Google Scholar
  69. Semykina, A., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Estimating panel data models in the presence of endogeneity and selection. Journal of Econometrics, 157, 375–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stock, J., & Watson, H. (2007). Introduction to econometrics. Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  71. Triest, R. K. (1990). The effect of income taxation on labor supply in the United States. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 491–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Soest, A., Woittiez, I., & Kapteyn, A. (1990). Labor supply, income taxes, and hours restrictions in The Netherlands. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 517–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels. Manuscript (version July 2009) Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  74. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  75. Zabel, J. E. (1997). Estimating wage elasticities for life-cycle models of labor supply behavior. Labour Economics, 4, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ziliak, J. P., & Kniesner, T. J. (1999). Estimating life cycle labor supply tax effects. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 326–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research DepartmentFederal Reserve Bank of DallasDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations