The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 112–131 | Cite as

Historic District Influence on House Prices and Marketing Duration



Historic property designations have been lauded for spurring renovation beyond the historic structures themselves through positive externalities in surrounding neighborhoods. Previous historic district research focuses on whether historic designation results in a price premium. This paper takes a more comprehensive look at the buying process, which must consider marketing duration within the historic district as well as influences on the sale of properties adjacent to the historic district. We examine how historic district designation in Baton Rogue, Louisiana is capitalized either through a price premium or marketing duration and how that mechanism differs between neighborhoods inside and outside the historic district boundaries. We employ a three stage least square, 3SLS, model to account for the effects of endogenous marketing duration on price capitalization estimates. The estimates are consistent with search-market theory in that marketing duration absorbs part of the capitalization of historic designation. We find that the more certain benefits from historic designation within the district are reflected in a price premium while the reduced regulation coupled with the cachet of being located near but not inside the district result in shorter marketing duration.


Historic districts House price Marketing duration Search model 


  1. Asabere, P. K., & Huffman, F. E. (1994). Historic designation and residential market values. The Appraisal Journal, 62(3), 396–401.Google Scholar
  2. Belkin, J., Hempel, D. J., & McLeavey, D. W. (1976). An empirical study of time on market using multidimensional segmentation of housing markets. American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Journal, 4(2), 57–75.Google Scholar
  3. Brasington, D., & Haurin D. (2006). Educational outcomes and house values: a test of the value added approach. Journal of Regional Science, 46, 245–268.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, D. E., & Herrin, W. E. (1997). Historical preservation and home sale prices: evidence from the Sacramento housing market. The Review of Regional Studies, 27, 29–48.Google Scholar
  5. Coulson, E. N., & Lahr, M. L. (2005). Gracing the land of Elvis and Beale Street: historic designation and property values in Memphis. Real Estate Economics, 33(3), 487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coulson, N. E., & Leichenko, R. M. (2001). The internal and external impact of historical designation on property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 23(1), 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, L. W. (2004). The effect of health risk on housing values: evidence from a cancer cluster. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1693–1704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ding, C., & Knapp, G. (2003). Property values in inner city neighborhoods: the effects of homeownership, housing investment, and economic development. Housing Policy Debate, 13(4), 701–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ding, C., Simons, R., & Baku, E. (2000). The effect of residential investment on nearby property values: evidence from Cleveland, Ohio. Journal Real Estate Research, 19(1/2), 23–47.Google Scholar
  10. Ford, D. (1989). The effect of historic district designation on single-family home prices. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 17, 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haughey, P., & Basolo, V. (2000). The Effect of dual local and national register historic district designations on single-family housing prices in New Orleans. The Appraisal Journal, 68(3), 283–289.Google Scholar
  12. Haurin, D. (1988). The duration of marketing time of residential housing. AREUEA Journal, 16(4), 396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heintzelman, M. D., & Altieri, J.A. (forthcoming). Historic preservation: Preserving value? Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, K. H., Benefield, J. D., & Wiley, J. A. (2009). Architectural review boards and their impact on property price and time-on-market. Journal of Housing Research, 18(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  15. Jud, G. D., Seaks, T. G., & Winkler, D. T. (1996). Time on the market: the impact of residential brokerage. Journal of Real Estate Research, 12, 447–458.Google Scholar
  16. Krainer, J. (1999). Real estate liquidity. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review, 0(3), 14–26.Google Scholar
  17. Krainer, J., & LeRoy, S. F. (2002). Equilibrium valuation of illiquid assets. Economic Theory, 19(2), 223–242.Google Scholar
  18. Leguizamon, S. (2010). The influence of reference group house size on house price. Real Estate Economics, 38(3), 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leichenko, R. M., Coulson, N. E., & Listokin, D. (2001). Historic preservation and residential property values: an analysis of Texas cities. Urban Studies, 38(11), 1973–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Listokin, D., Listokin, B., & Lahr, M. (1998). The contributions of historic preservation to housing and economic development. Housing Policy Debate, 9(3), 431–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mason, R. (2005). Economics and historic preservation: A guide and review of the literature. Discussion paper, The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy ProgramGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller, N. G. (1978). Time on the market and selling price. Real Estate Economics, 6(2), 164–174.Google Scholar
  23. Narwold, A., Sandy, J., & Tu, C. (2008). Historic designation and residential property values. International Real Estate Review, 11(1), 83–95.Google Scholar
  24. Noonan, D. S. (2007). Finding an impact of preservation policies: price effects of historic landmarks on attached homes in Chicago 1990–1999. Economic Development Quarterly, 21(1), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Noonan, D. S., & Krupka, D. J. (2011). Making—or picking—winners: evidence of internal and external price effects in historic preservation policies. Real Estate Economics, 39(2), 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Romero, A. M. (2004). The positive externalities of historic district designation. The Park Place Economist, 12(1), 71–74.Google Scholar
  27. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in perfect competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schaeffer, P. V., & Millerick, C. A. (1991). The impact of historic district designation on property values: an empirical study. Economic Development Quarterly, 5(4), 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sirmans, C. F., Turnbull, G. K., & Benjamin, J. D. (1991). The markets for housing and real estate broker services. Journal of Housing Economics, 1(3), 207–217.Google Scholar
  30. Sirmans, C. F., Turnbull, G. K., & Dombrow, J. (1997). Residential development, risk, and land prices. Journal of Regional Science, 37, 613–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sirmans, G. S., MacDonald, L., & Macpherson, D. A. (2010). A meta-analysis of selling price and time-on-the-market. Journal of Housing Research, 19(2), 139–152.Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, E., Rosenbaum, D., & Schmitz, B. (2011). Property values on the plains: the impact of historic preservation. The Annals of Regional Science, 47(2), 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turnbull, G. K., & Dombrow, J. (2006). Spatial competition and shopping externalities: evidence from the housing market. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2006(32), 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turnbull, G. K., & Zahirovic-Herbert, V. (2012). The transitory and legacy effects of the rental externality on house price and liquidity. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics., 44(3), 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Turnbull, G. K., Dombrow, J., & Sirmans, C. F. (2006). Big house, little house: relative size and value. Real Estate Economics, 34(3), 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zahirovic-Herbert, V., & Turnbull, G. K. (2008). School quality, house prices and liquidity. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 37, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zahirovic-Herbert, V., & Chatterjee, S. (2012). Historic preservation and residential property values: evidence from quantile regression. Urban Studies., 49(2), 369–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Georgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations