Advertisement

Price Discovery in Real Estate Markets: A Dynamic Analysis

  • Abdullah Yavas
  • Yildiray Yildirim
Article

Abstract

Although the correlation between the public and private market pricing of real estate has generated considerable research effort, the methods utilized in previous studies have failed to capture the dynamic nature of this correlation. This paper proposes a new statistical method to address this issue. This method, known as the dynamic conditional correlation GARCH model, enables us to study the dynamics of the correlation between the two markets over time and enrich our understanding of the public and private market pricing of real assets. We find that the correlation between NAV returns and REIT returns is dynamic for all REIT types and there is a strong degree of persistence in the series of correlation. Our Granger-causality tests show that price discovery generally takes place in the securitized public market. However, we also find significant variations across property types and individual firms within each type. Our results indicate that constructing an optimal portfolio requires firm level analysis of causality and correlation between REIT returns and NAV returns.

Keywords

Price discovery REIT returns NAV returns 

References

  1. Barkham, R., & Geltner, David G. (1995). Price discovery in American and British property markets. Real Estate Economics, 23, 21–44. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benveniste, L., Capozza, D., & Seguin, P. (2001). The value of liquidity. Real Estate Economics, 29(4), 633–660. doi: 10.1111/1080-8620.00026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Case, B., Yang, Y., & Yildirim, Y. (2008). Dynamic correlations among asset classes: REIT and stock returns, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, K. (1992). A further analysis of the lead-lag relationship between the cash market and stock index futures market. Review of Financial Studies, 5, 123–152. doi: 10.1093/rfs/5.1.123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandrashekaran, V. (1999). Time-series properties and diversification benefits of REIT returns. Journal of Real Estate Research, 17, 91–112.Google Scholar
  6. Chau, K. W., Macgregor, B. D., & Schwann, G. (2001). Price discovery in the Hong Kong real estate market. Journal of Property Research, 18(3), 187–216. doi: 10.1080/09599910110060064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherkes, M., Sagi, J., Stanton, R. (2006). A liquidity-based theory of closed-end funds. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  8. Clayton, J. (2003). Capital flows and asset values: a review of the literature and exploratory investigation in a real estate context. University of Cincinnati, working paper.Google Scholar
  9. Clayton, J., & MacKinnon, G. (2001a). Explaining the discount to NAV in REIT Pricing: noise or information? RERI Working Paper.Google Scholar
  10. Clayton, J., & MacKinnon, G. (2001b). Liquidity, the private real estate cycle, investor sentiment and the premium or discount to net asset value in REIT Pricing. RERI Working Paper.Google Scholar
  11. Clayton, J., & MacKinnon, G. (2001c). The time-varying nature of the link between REIT, real estate and financial asset returns. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 7(1), 43–54.Google Scholar
  12. Clayton, J., Ling, D. C., & Naranjo, A. (2009). Commercial real estate valuation: fundamentals versus investor sentiment. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 38, 5–37. doi: 10.1007/s11146-008-9130-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engle, R. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation—A simple class of Multivariate GARCH models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engle, R., & Sheppard, K. (2001). Theoretical and empirical properties of dynamic conditional correlation multivariate GARCH. NBER Working Papers 8554.Google Scholar
  15. Forbes, K., & Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: measuring stock market comovements. Journal of Finance, 57, 265–302. doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gentry, W. M., Jones, C. M., & Mayer, C. J. (2004) REIT reversion: stock price adjustments to fundamental value. Columbia University Working Paper.Google Scholar
  17. Giambona, E., Harding, J. P., & Sirmans, C. F. (2008). Explaining the variation in reit capital structure: the role of asset liquidation value. Real Estate Economics, 36, 111–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2008.00209.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haruvy, E., & Noussair, C. (2006). The effect of short selling on bubbles and crashes in experimental spot asset markets. Journal of Finance, 3, 1119–1157. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00868.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang, J-Z., & Zhong, Z. (2006). Time-variation in diversification benefits of commodity, REITs, and TIPS Working Paper, Penn State University.Google Scholar
  20. Ikramov, N., & Yavas, A. (2008). What affects the efficiency of the real estate market: an experimental study. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  21. Kearney, M. A., & Poti, V. (2003). DCC-GARCH modelling of market and firm-level correlation dynamics in the Dow Jones Eurotoxx50 index. Working Paper, Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
  22. King, B. F. (1966). Market and industry factors in stock price behavior. Journal of Business, 39, 139–190. doi: 10.1086/294847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, C. M. C., Shleifer, A., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle. Journal of Finance, 46, 75–109. doi: 10.2307/2328690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ling, D., & Ryngaert, M. (1997). Valuation uncertainty, institutional involvement, and the underpricing of IPOs: the case of REITs. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 433–456. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(96) 00891-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ling, D., & Naranjo, A. (2003). The dynamics of REIT capital flows and returns. Real Estate Economics, 31, 405–434. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liow, K. H. (2003). Propery company stock price and net asset value: a mean reversion perspective. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 27(2), 235–255. doi: 10.1023/A:1024780404907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liow, K. H., & Li, Y. (2006). Net asset value discounts for asian-pacific real estate companies: long-run relationships and short-term dynamics. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33(4), 363–388. doi: 10.1007/s11146-006-0338-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myer, N., & Webb, J. (1993). Return properties of equity REITs, common stocks and commercial real estate: a comparison. Journal of Real Estate Research, 8, 87–106.Google Scholar
  29. Newell, G., & Chau, K. W. (1996). Linkages between direct and indirect property performance in Hong Kong. Journal of Property Finance, 7(4), 9–30. doi: 10.1108/09588689610152363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pagliari, J. L,. Jr, Scherer, K. A., & Monopoli, R. T. (2005). Public versus private real estate equities: a more refined, long-term comparison. Real Estate Economics, 33, 147–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1080-8620.2005.00115.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Riddiough, T. J., Moriarty, M., & Yeatman, P. J. (2005). Privately versus publicly held asset investment performance. Real Estate Economics, 33, 121–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1080-8620.2005.00114.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stoll, H. R., & Whaley, R. E. (1990). The dynamics of stock index and stock index futures returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25(4), 441–468. doi: 10.2307/2331010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Subrahmanyam, A. (2007). Liquidity, return, and order-flow linkages between REITs and the stock market. Real Estate Economics, 35, 383–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2007.00194.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tuluca, W., Myer, F. C. N., & Webb, James R. (2000). Dynamics of private and public real estate markets. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 21(3), 279–296. doi: 10.1023/A:1012055920332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smeal College of Business AdministrationPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Whitman School of ManagementSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations