The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 211–231 | Cite as

Neutral Property Taxation Under Uncertainty



In a framework where no uncertainty arises, Arnott (J Publ Econ Theor 7:27–50, 2005) investigates a neutral property taxation policy that will not affect a landowner’s choices of capital intensity and timing of development. We investigate the same issue, but allow rents on structures to be stochastic over time. We assume that a regulator implements taxation on capital, vacant land, and post-development property so as to expropriate a certain ratio of pre-tax site value as well as to achieve neutrality. We find that the optimal taxation policy is to tax capital and subsidize properties before and after development. We also investigate how this optimal policy changes in response to changes in several exogenous forces related to demand and supply conditions of the real estate market.


Neutral property taxation Real options Tax revenues Uncertainty 

JEL Classification

G13 H21 R11 



We would like to thank the guest editors (Richard Buttimer and Kanak Patel), one anonymous reviewer, Richard Arnott, Edward Coulson, Steven Ott, Dean A. Paxson, Brenda A. Priebe, and participants at the 2007 Cambridge-UNCC Symposium, the 2007 Joint AsRES-AREUEA International Conference, and the National Taiwan University for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. Jyh-Bang Jou acknowledges financial support from the Social Policy Research Center, College of Social Sciences, National Taiwan University.


  1. Anderson J. E. (1993). Use-value property tax assessment: Effects on land development. Land Economics, 69(3), 263–269 doi: 10.2307/3146592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson J. E. (1999). Two-rate property tax effects on land development. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 18(2), 181–190 doi: 10.1023/A:1007766608770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnott R. J. (2005). Neutral property taxation. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 7, 27–50 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2005.00192.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnott R. J., & Lewis F. D. (1979). The transition of land to urban use. Journal of Political Economy, 87(1), 161–169 doi: 10.1086/260744 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnott R. J., & Petrova P. (2006). The property tax as a tax on value: Deadweight loss. International Tax and Public Finance, 13, 241–266 doi: 10.1007/s10797-006-4938-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bar-Ilan A., & Strange W. C. (1996). Investment lags. American Economic Review, 86, 610–622Google Scholar
  7. Bar-Ilan A., & Strange W. C. (1998). A model of sequential investment. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 22, 437–463 doi: 10.1016/S0165-1889(97)00066-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barro R. J. (1990). Government sending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 103–125 doi: 10.1086/261726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bentick B. L. (1979). The impact of taxation and valuation practices on timing and efficiency of land use. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 858–868 doi: 10.1086/260797 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bird R. M., & Slack E. (2004). International handbook of land and property taxation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Capozza D., & Li Y. (1994). The intensity and timing of investment: The case of land. American Economic Review, 84(4), 889–904Google Scholar
  12. Childs P. D., Riddiough T. J., & Triantis A. J. (1996). Mixed uses and the redevelopment option. Real Estate Economics, 24(3), 317–339 doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox D. R., & Miller H. E. (1970). The theory of stochastic processes. London, England: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
  14. Cox J. C., & Ross S. A. (1976). The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 145–166 doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90023-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixit A. K., & Pindyck R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grenadier S. R. (2000). Equilibrium with time-to-build: A real options approach. In: M. Brennan, L. Trigeorgis (Eds.), Project Flexibility, Agency and Competition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hassett K. A., & Metcalf G. E. (1999). Investment with uncertain tax policy: Does random tax policy discourage investment? Economic Journal, 109, 372–393 doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jou J. B., & Lee T. (2007). Do tighter restrictions on density retard development? Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 34(2), 225–232 doi: 10.1007/s11146-007-9010-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jou J. B., & Lee T. (2008). Taxation on land value and development when there are negative externalities from development. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 36(1), 103–120 doi: 10.1007/s11146-007-9072-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee T., & Jou J. B. (2007). The regulation of optimal development density. Journal of Housing Economics, 16, 21–36 doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2007.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McFarlane A. (1999). Taxes, fees, and urban development. Journal of Urban Economics, 46(3), 416–436 doi: 10.1006/juec.1999.2130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mills D. E. (1981). The non-neutrality of land value taxation. National Tax Journal, 34, 125–129Google Scholar
  23. Shoup D. (1970). The optimal timing of urban land development. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 25, 33–44 doi: 10.1007/BF01935815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skouras A. (1978). The non-neutrality of land taxation. Public Finance, 30, 113–134Google Scholar
  25. Turnbull G. K. (1988). The effects of local taxes and public services on residential development. Journal of Regional Science, 28, 541–562 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1988.tb01373.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williams J. T. (1991). Real estate development as an option. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4(2), 191–208 doi: 10.1007/BF00173124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams J. T. (1997). Redevelopment of real assets. Real Estate Economics, 25(3), 387–407 doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceMassey University Albany CampusNew Zealand
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of National DevelopmentNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiRepublic of China
  3. 3.Department of FinanceAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand
  4. 4.Department of International BusinessYuan Ze UniversityTaoyuanRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations