Sensitivity to the positional information of morphemes inside Chinese compound words and its relationship with word reading
- 517 Downloads
The purpose of the present study was to investigate developmental differences in lexical processing and sensitivity to the positional information of constituent morphemes with reference to Chinese word-reading ability. One hundred mainland Chinese children (50 s graders and 50 third graders) and 22 high school students were tested with a lexical decision task. The primary school children were also tested for Chinese character reading, morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and non-verbal intelligence. We found that although both primary school children and high school students performed worse in the reversed condition (i.e., the pseudo-words were created by reversing the order of the two characters in real Chinese words) than in the real (i.e., real Chinese compound words) and random conditions (i.e., the pseudo-words were constructed by randomly combining the characters in the reversed condition), the performances of high school students in the reversed condition were closer to their performances in the other two conditions. Correlational analyses conducted on the primary school children revealed that the responses of second- and third-grade children on the lexical decision task were moderately correlated with their Chinese character reading. We also found that, after controlling for age and non-verbal IQ, the reaction time difference between the real and reversed conditions significantly predicted Chinese character reading. The results were discussed by exploring the nature of the lexical decision task, the sensitivity of Chinese children to the positional information of morphemes inside compound words, and the association of such sensitivity with their word-reading performance.
KeywordsLexical processing Pseudo-word Positional information
This research was partly supported by the Internal Research Grant of the Hong Kong Institute of Education (Project code: R3318) to Duo Liu. Thanks to all research helpers, the children and their parents for their participation.
- Besner, D., & Johnston, J. (1989). Reading and the mental lexicon: On the uptake of visual information. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 291–316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Da, J. (2004). Chinese text computing. http://lingua.mtsu.edu/chinese-computing.
- Institute of Language Teaching and Research. (1986). A frequency dictionary of modern Chinese. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 166–178.Google Scholar
- McBride-Chang, C., Cho, J.-R., Liu, H., Wagner, R. K., Shu, H., Zhou, A., et al. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological awareness and morphological structure awareness with vocabulary and word recognition in second graders from Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and the United States. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1999). Metalinguistic awareness and literacy acquisition in different languages. In D. Wagner, R. Venezky, & B. Street (Eds.), Literacy: An international handbook (pp. 155–160). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Peng, D., Ding, G., Wang, C., Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1999). Chinese reversible word’s processing: The role of morpheme on word processing. Acta Psychological Sinica, 31, 36–46.Google Scholar
- Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1996). Standard progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, F. (1985). Reading without nonsense (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- van Orden, G., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269–1291.Google Scholar