Children with dyslexia are slow writers because they pause more often and not because they are slow at handwriting execution
- 2k Downloads
It is commonly assumed that children with dyslexia are slower at handwriting than other children. However, evidence of slow handwriting in children with dyslexia is very mixed. Thirty-one children with dyslexia, aged 9 years, were compared to both age-matched children and younger spelling-ability matched children. Participants completed an alphabet-writing task and a composition task on the surface of a digital writing tablet. Children with dyslexia wrote the same amount of letters per minute in the alphabet task but wrote fewer words per minute when composing their texts than children of the same age. Crucially, no differences were found between children with dyslexia and their same age peers for speed of handwriting execution, measured by the tablet, when writing the alphabet or composing their texts. However, children with dyslexia were found to pause within their compositions as often as the spelling ability matched group. Thus handwriting execution is not impaired in children with dyslexia. The slow writing that is typical of children with dyslexia is due to pausing more often when composing and is related to spelling ability. This may reflect processing problems in response to high cognitive load through having to contend with spelling and composing concurrently.
KeywordsComposing Dyslexia Handwriting Speed Writing
This research was supported by a studentship from The Waterloo Foundation. Special thanks go to the children and schools that participated in this study. This research was supported by a studentship from The Waterloo Foundation and Oxford Brookes University awarded to Emma Sumner.
- Alamargot, D., Dansac, C., Chesnet, D., & Fayol, M. (2007). Parallel processing before and after pauses: A combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production. In M. Torrance, L. van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (Vol. 20, pp. 13–29). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Alamargot, D., Plane, S., Lambert, E., & Chesnet, D. (2009). Using eye and pen movements to trace the development of writing expertise: Case studies of a 7th, 9th and 12th grader, a graduate student, and professional writer. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 853–888. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9191-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barnett, A., Henderson, S. E., Scheib, B., & Schulz, J. (2007). DASH detailed assessment of speed of handwriting. London, United Kingdom: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Berninger, V. W., Cartwright, A., Yates, C., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique functional systems. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 161–196. doi: 10.1007/BF01026911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berninger, V. W., & Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing. In E. Butterfield (Ed.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of development of skilled writing (pp. 57–81). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K., Abbott, R. D., Begay, K., Coleman, K. B., Curtin, G., et al. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 291–304. doi: 10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dockrell, J. E., Lindsay, G., & Connelly, V. (2009). The impact of specific language impairment on adolescents’ written text. Exceptional Children, 75, 427–446.Google Scholar
- Dockrell, J. E., Lindsay, G., Connelly, V., & Mackie, C. (2007). Constraints in the production of written text in children with specific language impairments. Exceptional Children, 73, 147–164.Google Scholar
- Elliott, C. D., Smith, P., & McCulloch, K. (1996). British abilities scales second edition: Administration and scoring manual. Berkshire, United Kingdom: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar
- Henderson, S., Sugden, D., & Barnett, A. (2007). Movement assessment battery for children: Second edition: manual. London, United Kingdom: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Maggio, S., Lété, B., Chenu, F., Jisa, H., & Fayol, M. (2011). Tracking the mind during writing: Immediacy, delayed, and anticipatory effects on pauses and writing rate. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9348-1.
- McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299–324. doi: 10.1007/BF01464076.
- Olive, T. (2010). Methods, techniques, and tools for the on-line study of the writing process. In N. L. Mertens (Ed.), Writing: processes, tools and techniques (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Ott, P. (2007). Teaching children with dyslexia: A practical guide. Oxford, United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rose, J. (2009). Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties. London, United Kingdom: Department for Children Schools and Families.Google Scholar
- Rust, J. (1996). The manual of the Wechsler objective language dimensions (WOLD) (UK ed.). London, United Kingdom: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading and writing development. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 171–183). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Sumner, E., Connelly, V., & Barnett, A. (in press). Dyslexia and expressive writing in English. In B. Arfé, J. E. Dockrell, & V. W. Berninger (Eds.), Writing development and instruction in children with hearing, speech and oral language difficulties. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wengelin, A. (2007). The word-level focus in text production by adults with reading and writing difficulties. In M. W. Torrance, L. van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (Vol. 20, pp. 67–82). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.Google Scholar