Abstract
Rapid serial naming tasks are frequently used to explain variance in reading skill. However, the construct being measured by rapid naming is yet undetermined. The Phonological Processing theory suggests that rapid naming relates to reading because of similar demands of access to long-term stored phonological representations of visual stimuli. Some researchers have argued that isolated or discrete-trial naming is a more precise measure of lexical access than serial naming, thus it is likely that any shared variance between these two formats can be attributed to similar lexical access demands. The present study examined whether there remained any variance in reading ability that could be uniquely explained by the rapid naming task while controlling for isolated naming. Structural equation modeling was used to examine these relations within the context of the phonological processing model. Results indicated that serial naming uniquely predicted reading, and the relation was stronger with isolated naming controlled for, suggesting that isolated naming functioned as a suppressor variable in the relation of serial naming with reading.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarnoutse, C., van Leeuwe, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2005). Early literacy from a longitudinal perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11, 253–275.
Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). Amos (Version 5.0) [computer software]. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Bowers, P. (1989). Naming speed and phonological awareness: Independent contributors to reading disabilities. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 38, 165–172.
Bowers, P. G. (1995). Tracing symbol naming speed’s unique contributions to reading disabilities over time. Reading and Writing, 7, 189–216.
Bowers, P. G., & Swanson, L. B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 195–219.
Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5, 69–85.
Bowey, J. A., McGuigan, M., & Ruschena, A. (2005). On the association between serial naming speed for letters and digits and word-reading skill: Towards a developmental account. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 400–422.
Clarke, P., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2005). Individual differences in ran and reading: A response timing analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 73–86.
Compton, D. L. (2003). Modeling the relationship between growth in rapid naming speed and growth in decoding skill in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 225–239.
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. (1974). Rapid “automatized” naming of pictured objects, colors, letters, and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186–202.
Eakin, S., & Douglas, V. (1971). “Automatization” and oral reading problems in children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 26–33.
Hawelka, S., & Wimmer, H. (2005). Impaired visual processing of multielement arrays is associated with increased number of eye movements in dyslexic reading. Vision Research, 45, 855–863.
Jones, M. W., Obregon, M., Kelly, M. L., & Pranigan, H. P. (2008). Elucidating the component processes involved in dyslexic and non-dyslexic reading fluency: Evidence from eye-tracking. Cognition, 109, 389–407.
Kail, R., & Hall, L. K. (1994). Processing speed, naming speed, and reading. Developmental Psychology, 30, 949–954.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
McBride-Chang, C. (1996). Models of speech perception and phonological processing in reading. Child Development, 67, 1836–1856.
Meng, X., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 172–175.
Moll, K., Fussenegger, Bl., Willburger, E., & Landerl, K. (2009). RAN is not a measure of orthographic processing: Evidence from the asymmetric German orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 1–25.
Neuhaus, G., Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., & Carlson, C. D. (2001). Measures of information processing in rapid automatized naming (ran) and their relation to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 359–373.
Nicolson, R. I., & Fawcett, A. J. (1994). Reaction times and dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 29–48.
Pennington, B. F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P. A., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 14, 707–755.
Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. Gough, L. C. Erhi, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perfetti, C. A., Finger, E., & Hogaboam, T. W. (1978). Sources of vocalization latency differences between skilled and less-skilled young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 730–739.
Plaza, M. (2003). The role of naming speed, phonological processing and morphological/syntactic skill in the reading and spelling performance of second-grade children. Current Psychology Letters: Behaviour, Brain & Cognition. Special Issue on Language Disorders and Reading Acquisition, 10(1), 1–7.
Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., Stuart, M., Garwood, H., & Quinlan, P. (2007). An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98, 46–68.
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282.
Simpson, J., & Everatt, J. (2005). Reception class predictors of literacy skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 171–188.
Spring, C., & Davis, J. M. (1988). Relations of digit naming speed with three components of reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 315–334.
Staller, J., & Sekuler, R. (1975). Children read normal and reversed letters: A simple test of reading skill. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 539–550.
Stanovich, K. E. (1981). Relationships between word decoding speed, general name-retrieval ability, and reading progress in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 809–815.
Stanovich, K. E., Feeman, D. J., & Cunningham, A. E. (1983). The development of the relation between letter-naming speed and reading ability. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 199–202.
Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1982). Automatization failure in learning disabilities. Topics in Learning Disabilities, 2, 1–11.
Swanson, H. L., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D. M., & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Rapid naming, phonological awareness, and reading: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Review of Educational Research, 73, 407–440.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second-to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161–185.
Uhry, J. K. (2002). Basic functions of language, reading and reading disability. Neuropsychology and cognition: vol. 20. Name of volume (pp. 299–313). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Vukovic, R. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 25–47.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83–103.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468–479.
Walsh, D. J., Price, G. G., & Gillingham, M. G. (1988). The critical but transitory importance of letter naming. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 108–122.
Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123–141.
Wolf, M., Bally, H., & Morris, R. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 415–438.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.
Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery test—revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Acknowledgments
One of the authors (J. A. R. Logan) received pre-doctoral training support during the conduct of this research through grant R305B04074 from the Institute of Education Sciences to Florida State University. Support for writing this article has been provided by Grant P50 HD052120 from NICHD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Logan, J.A.R., Schatschneider, C. & Wagner, R.K. Rapid serial naming and reading ability: the role of lexical access. Read Writ 24, 1–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9199-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9199-1