Abstract
Two experiments were conducted in order to explore the role of prefix identification in the reading of Dutch bisyllabic words. Although Dutch orthography is highly regular, several deviations from a one-to-one correspondence exist. A case in point is the grapheme E which can represent the vowels ε, e and œ in polysyllabic words. In Experiment 1, 33 third-grade children and 46 sixth-grade children were presented a list of randomly ordered bisyllabic words starting with the letter string BE and the first syllable being (1) a real prefix, (2) a phonological prefix (same sound pattern as a prefix), or (3) a pseudoprefix (sound pattern deviant from a prefix). Pseudowords starting with the same letter string were also presented. The results showed that words starting with a real or a phonological prefix were identified more accurately than words starting with a pseudoprefix. For the pseudowords, a predominant interpretation of the first part as a prefix was also evidenced. In Experiment 2, a lexical decision task was administered to 35 third-grade children, 33 sixth-grade children, and 26 adults. Words with a phonological prefix and words with a pseudoprefix were randomly presented along with other word types. The data showed both children and adults to retrieve words with phonological prefixes more quickly and more accurately than words with a pseudoprefix. The results are discussed with reference to current models of word decoding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Assink E. M. H., Vooijs C. and Knuijt P. P. N. A. (2000). Prefixes as access units in visual word recognition: A comparison of Italian and Dutch data. Reading and Writing 12: 149–168
Baayen R. H. and Piepenbrock R. (1993). The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM. Linguistic DataConsortium, Philadelphia, PA
Brown P., Lupker S. J. and Colombo L. (1994). Interacting sources of information in word naming: A study of individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 537–554
Carlisle J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In: (eds) Morphological aspects of language processing, pp 189–209. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Carlisle J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing 12: 169–190
Carlisle J. F. and Nomanbhoy D. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics 14: 177–195
Colombo L. (1992). Lexical stress effect and its interaction with frequency in word pronunciation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18: 987–1003
Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R. and Ziegler J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 108: 204–256
Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 77–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Kooij J. G. (1994). Dutch. In: Comrie, B. (eds) The major languages of Western Europe, pp 139–156. Routledge, London
Laudanna A. and Burani C. (1995). Distributional properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing. In: Feldman, L. B. (eds) Morphological aspects of language processing, pp 345–364. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Leong C. K. (2000). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5 and 6 children’s spelling. Reading and Writing 12: 169–190
Levelt W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 223–232
Nagy W., Diakidoy I. and Anderson R. (1993). The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meaning of derivates. Journal of reading Behavior 25: 155–170
Perfetti C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In: Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C. and Treiman, R. (eds) Reading acquisition, pp 145–174. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Plaut D. C. and Gonnerman L. M. (2000). Are nonsemantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?. Language and Cognitive Processing 15: 445–485
Plaut D. C., McClelland J. L., Seidenberg M. S. and Patterson K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 103: 56–115
Rastle K. and Coltheart M. (2000). Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language 42: 342–364
Reitsma P. and Verhoeven L. (1990). Acquisition of reading in Dutch. Foris, Dordrecht
Schaerlaekens A., Kohnstamm D. and Lejaegere M. (1999). Streeflijst woordenschat voor zesjarigen. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse
Schreuder R. and Baayen R. H. (1994). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Memory and Language 33: 357–375
Schreuder R. and Baayen R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In: (eds) Morphological aspects of language processing, pp 131–157. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Seidenberg M. S. and Gonnerman L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 353–361
Staphorsius G. and Krom R. (1988). Frequenties van woordvormen en letterposities in jeugdliteratuur. Cito, Arnhem
Torgeson J. T. (2001). The theory and practice of intervention: comparing outcomes from prevention and remediation studies. In: Fawcett, A. (eds) Dyslexia, theory and good practice, pp 203–217. Whurr, London
Goldinger S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 1269–1291
(1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading. Memory & Cognition 15: 181–198
Goldinger S. D. (1996). Phonological mediation in skilled and dyslexic reading. In: Chase, C. H., Rosen, G. D. and Sherman, G. F. (eds) Developmental dyslexia: Neural, cognitive and genetic mechanisms, pp 185–223. York Press, Timonium, MD
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The role of morphology in learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 209–271
Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (2003). Units of analysis in reading Dutch bisyllabic pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 255–271
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R. & Haarman, V. Prefix identification in the reading of Dutch bisyllabic words. Read Writ 19, 651–668 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-1912-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-1912-0