Advertisement

Quality of Life Research

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1339–1351 | Cite as

Multilevel socioeconomic effects on quality of life in adolescent and young adult survivors of leukemia and lymphoma

  • Erin E. Kent
  • Leonard S. Sender
  • Rebecca A. Morris
  • Timothy J. Grigsby
  • Michael J. Montoya
  • Argyrios Ziogas
  • Hoda Anton-Culver
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer registry survival analyses have shown that adolescent and young adult patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) have reduced survival compared to those with higher SES. The objective of this study was to determine whether neighborhood- (nSES) and/or individual-level SES (iSES) also predicted current quality of life in adolescent and young adult survivors.

Methods

The Socioeconomics and Quality of Life study surveyed adolescent and young adult survivors of leukemia and lymphoma at least one year post-diagnosis using population-based ascertainment. Factor analysis was used to create a multidimensional age-relevant iSES score and compared with a preexisting census-block-group derived nSES score. Four quality of life domains were assessed: physical health, psychological and emotional well-being, social relationships, and life skills. Nested multivariable linear regression models were run to test the associations between both SES measures and quality of life and to compare the explanatory power of nSES and iSES.

Results

Data from 110 individuals aged 16–40 were included in the final analysis. After adjustment for sociodemographic confounders, low nSES was associated only with poorer physical health, whereas low iSES was related to poorer quality of life in all four domains with iSES accounting for an additional 14, 12, 25, and 10 % of the variance, respectively.

Conclusions

Measures of SES at the individual as compared to the neighborhood level may be stronger indicators of outcomes in adolescents and young adults, which has important implications for SES measurement in the context of cancer surveillance.

Keywords

Adolescents and young adults Quality of life Socioeconomic status Health disparities Leukemia Lymphoma Cancer Cancer survivorship 

Abbreviations

SES

Socioeconomic status

iSES

individual-level socioeconomic status

nSES

neighborhood-level socioeconomic status

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out as part of Erin Kent’s doctoral dissertation at the University of California, Irvine. Support for this work was provided by a UC MEXUS dissertation grant and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention R36 Public Health Dissertation Grant R36DP002012-01). The authors thank undergraduate research assistants Marym Mohammady and Priyanka Saxena for their assistance with study recruitment coordination and clinical research coordinator Isabel Guzman for her assistance with translation of the study documents into Spanish.

Conflict of interest

The ideas expressed in the following paper are those of the authors and endorsement by the State of California, Department of Health Services, the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and/or the Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute of the University of California, Irvine is not intended, nor should it be inferred The SEOOL study was approved by the UC Irvine Institutional Review Board under Human Subjects Numbers 2006-4958 and 2009-7130. The authors have no financial interests to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Gage, E. (2010). Examining the most relevant conceptualization of the socioeconomic status construct for cancer research. Cancer Nursing, 33, E1–E9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oakes, J. M., & Rossi, P. H. (2003). The measurement of SES in health research: Current practice and steps toward a new approach. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 769–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyce, W., Torsheim, T., Currie, C., & Zambon, A. (2006). The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: Validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Social Indicators Research, 78, 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group. (2006). Closing the gap: Research and care imperatives for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Bethesda, MD; 2006 August Report No.: NIH Publication No. 06-6067.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abrams, A. N., Hazen, E. P., & Penson, R. T. (2007). Psychosocial issues in adolescents with cancer. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 33, 622–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Decker, C. L. (2007). Social support and adolescent cancer survivors: A review of the literature. Psychooncology, 16, 1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zebrack, B. J., Yi, J., Petersen, L., & Ganz, P. A. (2008). The impact of cancer and quality of life for long-term survivors. Psychooncology, 17, 891–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Palermo, T. M., Long, A. C., Lewandowski, A. S., Drotar, D., Quittner, A. L., & Walker, L. S. (2008). Evidence-based assessment of health-related quality of life and functional impairment in pediatric psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33, 983–996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parsons, S. K., Shih, M. C., Duhamel, K. N., Ostroff, J., Mayer, D. K., Austin, J., et al. (2006). Maternal perspectives on children’s health-related quality of life during the first year after pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 31, 1100–1115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Upton, P., Eiser, C., Cheung, I., Hutchings, H. A., Jenney, M., Maddocks, A., et al. (2005). Measurement properties of the UK-English version of the pediatric quality of life inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 3, 22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yost, K., Perkins, C., Cohen, R., Morris, C., & Wright, W. (2001). Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes and Control, 12, 703–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bleyer, A., Viny, A., & Barr, R. (2006). Cancer in 15- to 29-year-olds by primary site. Oncologist, 11, 590–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    World Health Organization: Division of Mental Health. (1993). WHO-QOL Study protocol: The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Link, N. J., Maurer, E., Largent, J., Kent, E., Morris, R. A., Sender, L. S., et al. (2009). Kids, Adolescents, and young adult cancer study—a methodologic approach in cancer epidemiology research. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2009, 354257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Galobardes, B., Shaw, M., Lawlor, D. A., Smith, G. D., & Lynch, J. (2006). Indicators of socioeconomic position. In J. M. Oakes & J. S. Kaufman (Eds.), Methods in social epidemiology (pp. 47–85). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chu, K. P., Shema, S., Wu, S., Gomez, S. L., Chang, E. T., & Le, Q. T. (2011). Head and neck cancer-specific survival based on socioeconomic status in Asians and Pacific Islanders. Cancer, 117, 1935–1945.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clarke, C. A., Miller, T., Chang, E. T., Yin, D., Cockburn, M., & Gomez, S. L. (2010). Racial and social class gradients in life expectancy in contemporary California. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 1373–1380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gomez, S. L., Glaser, S. L., McClure, L. A., Shema, S. J., Kealey, M., Keegan, T. H., et al. (2011). The California neighborhoods data system: A new resource for examining the impact of neighborhood characteristics on cancer incidence and outcomes in populations. Cancer Causes and Control, 22, 631–647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kent, E. E., Morris, R. A., Largent, J. A., Ziogas, A., Sender, L. S., & Anton-Culver, H. (2010). Socioeconomic impacts on survival differ by race/ethnicity among adolescents and young adults with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2010, 824691.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kent, E. E., Sender, L. S., Largent, J. A., & Anton-Culver, H. (2009). Leukemia survival in children, adolescents, and young adults: Influence of socioeconomic status and other demographic factors. Cancer Causes and Control, 20, 1409–1420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warner, E. T., & Gomez, S. L. (2010). Impact of neighborhood racial composition and metropolitan residential segregation on disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival between black and white women in California. Journal of Community Health, 35, 398–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yin, D., Morris, C., Allen, M., Cress, R., Bates, J., & Liu, L. (2010). Does socioeconomic disparity in cancer incidence vary across racial/ethnic groups? Cancer Causes and Control, 21, 1721–1730.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yost, K. J., Hahn, E. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., Ayanian, J. Z., & West, D. W. (2008). Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 6, 66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boman, K. K., & Bodegard, G. (2004). Life after cancer in childhood: Social adjustment and educational and vocational status of young-adult survivors. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/oncology, 26, 354–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Granovetter, M. S. (1973). Strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zambon, A., Morgan, A., Vereecken, C., Colombini, S., Boyce, W., Mazur, J., et al. (2010). The contribution of club participation to adolescent health: Evidence from six countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64, 89–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 545–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Langeveld, N. E., Stam, H., Grootenhuis, M. A., & Last, B. F. (2002). Quality of life in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 10, 579–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bleyer, W. A. (2002). Cancer in older adolescents and young adults: Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, survival, and importance of clinical trials. Medical and Pediatric Oncology, 38, 1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., et al. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11, 570–579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Topolski, T. D., Patrick, D. L., Edwards, T. C., Huebner, C. E., Connell, F. A., & Mount, K. K. (2001). Quality of life and health-risk behaviors among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 426–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Clinton-McHarg, T., Carey, M., Sanson-Fisher, R., Shakeshaft, A., & Rainbird, K. (2010). Measuring the psychosocial health of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: A critical review. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 8, 25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang, M., Burau, K. D., Fang, S., Wang, H., & Du, X. L. (2008). Ethnic variations in diagnosis, treatment, socioeconomic status, and survival in a large population-based cohort of elderly patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer, 113, 3231–3241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bentley, R., Kavanagh, A. M., Subramanian, S. V., & Turrell, G. (2008). Area disadvantage, individual socio-economic position, and premature cancer mortality in Australia 1998 to 2000: A multilevel analysis. Cancer Causes and Control, 19, 183–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thomas, A. J., Eberly, L. E., Neaton, J. D., & Davey Smith, G. (2007). Census-based and personally reported income measures as long-term risk-adjusted mortality predictors. Public Health, 121, 898–901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pickett, K. E., & Pearl, M. (2001). Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: A critical review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 111–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scharoun-Lee, M., Adair, L. S., Kaufman, J. S., & Gordon-Larsen, P. (2009). Obesity, race/ethnicity and the multiple dimensions of socioeconomic status during the transition to adulthood: A factor analysis approach. Social Science and Medicine, 68, 708–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Green, C. R., & Hart-Johnson, T. (2010). Cancer pain: An age-based analysis. Pain Medicine, 11, 1525–1536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bowen, D. J., Alfano, C. M., McGregor, B. A., Kuniyuki, A., Bernstein, L., Meeske, K., et al. (2007). Possible socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in quality of life in a cohort of breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 106, 85–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ell, K., Xie, B., Wells, A., Nedjat-Haiem, F., Lee, P. J., & Vourlekis, B. (2008). Economic stress among low-income women with cancer: Effects on quality of life. Cancer, 112, 616–625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Simon, A. E., & Wardle, J. (2008). Socioeconomic disparities in psychosocial wellbeing in cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 44, 572–578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zebrack, B. J., Zevon, M. A., Turk, N., Nagarajan, R., Whitton, J., Robison, L. L., et al. (2007). Psychological distress in long-term survivors of solid tumors diagnosed in childhood: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 49, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Progress Review Group [AYAO PRG]. (2006). Closing the gap: Research and care imperatives for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Bethesda, MD; 2006 August. Report No.: NIH Publication No. 06-6067.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zebrack, B. (2009). Information and service needs for young adult cancer survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17, 349–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gurney, J. G., Krull, K. R., Kadan-Lottick, N., Nicholson, H. S., Nathan, P. C., Zebrack, B., et al. (2009). Social outcomes in the childhood cancer survivor study cohort. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27, 2390–2395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Braveman, P. A., Cubbin, C., Egerter, S., Chideya, S., Marchi, K. S., Metzler, M., et al. (2005). Socioeconomic status in health research: One size does not fit all. JAMA, 294, 2879–2888.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Friedman, D. L., Whitton, J., Leisenring, W., Mertens, A. C., Hammond, S., Stovall, M., et al. (2010). Subsequent neoplasms in 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 102, 1083–1095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Michel, G., Kuehni, C. E., Rebholz, C. E., Zimmermann, K., Eiser, C., & Rueegg, C. S. et al. (2010) Can health beliefs help in explaining attendance to follow-up care? The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Psychooncology. Aug 4. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Smith, T., Stein, K. D., Mehta, C. C., Kaw, C., Kepner, J. L., Buskirk, T., et al. (2007). The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors. Cancer, 109, 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sundberg, K. K., Doukkali, E., Lampic, C., Eriksson, L. E., Arvidson, J., & Wettergren, L. (2010). Long-term survivors of childhood cancer report quality of life and health status in parity with a comparison group. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 55, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shen, M., Cozen, W., Huang, L., Colt, J., De Roos, A. J., Severson, R. K., et al. (2008). Census and geographic differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 350–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Krieger, N., & Davey Smith, G. (2004). “Bodies count,” and body counts: Social epidemiology and embodying inequality. Epidemiologic Reviews, 26, 92–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin E. Kent
    • 1
    • 2
  • Leonard S. Sender
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Rebecca A. Morris
    • 4
  • Timothy J. Grigsby
    • 5
  • Michael J. Montoya
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
  • Argyrios Ziogas
    • 2
    • 9
  • Hoda Anton-Culver
    • 2
    • 3
    • 9
  1. 1.Cancer Prevention Fellowship ProgramNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA
  3. 3.Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA
  4. 4.Hyundai Cancer Institute, CHOC Children’s HospitalOrangeUSA
  5. 5.Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Department of Preventive MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  6. 6.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA
  7. 7.Department of Chicano/Latino StudiesUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA
  8. 8.Department of Population Health and PreventionUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA
  9. 9.Genetic Epidemiology Research InstituteUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations