Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Homosexuality, homophobia and support for Lesbians and Gay human rights

Relationship between affective and cognitive reaction toward homosexuals: an exploratory study in a Southern Italian sample

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies on homophobia found the origin of discriminatory attitudes regarding homosexuals in conceptual equations presenting homosexuality either as a genetic error, or as psychological “disturbance” or at other times as a ‘mistake’ in the socialization process. Although in respect to the more or less recent past, today we witness a greater amount of openness toward homosexuals which has above all affirmed juridical equality, yet discriminatory attitudes seem to persist in mentalities and social practices. This study investigates homophobia in Sicilian society, where the culture has traditionally focused on the ‘male cult’, with strong sexist and homophobic attitudes. In particular, it explores the relationship between an emotional or affective negative reaction toward homosexuals and a more cognitive or rational reaction toward homosexuality particularly linked to the degree of support for Gay and Lesbian human rights issues. It is our hypothesis that it is possible to feel uncomfortable in associating with homosexuals without necessarily refusing them social and political equality.The findings seem to confirm the idea that knowing one reaction the other reaction can’t be necessarily inferred. They in fact show that there is no a relationship between an affective reaction (measured by revised version of the Hudson/Ricketts Index of Homophobia or IAH scale) and a cognitive one toward homosexuality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to tests conducted by Hudson and Ricketts an alpha coefficient of 0.91 and a low standard error of measurement suffice to show the scale’s reliability and unidimensionality. A positive correlation of 0.53 significant at \(p<\).0001of IHP and SAS scores [Sexual Attitudine Scale, a reliable and valid measure of an individual’s conservative vs liberal beliefs on the expression of human sexuality (Hudson and Murphy 1978)] assure instead construct validity.

  2. Items 12, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the IHP modified version replace the following original items:

    1. 12.

      I would deny to members of my peer group that I had friends who were homosexual

    2. 18.

      I would like to have my parents know that I had gay friends.

    3. 19.

      I would feel uncomfortable kissing a close friend of my sex in public

    4. 20.

      I would like to have friends of my sex who were homosexual

    5. 21.

      If a member of my sex made an advance toward me I would wonder if I were homosexual

    According to Hudson and Ricketts, these items conform less to the proposed definition of homophobia: item 12 represents a decision concerning social relations; items 18 and 20 represent preference statements and item 21 represents a judgement concerning one’s sexual status. Item 19 was substituted to strengthen the overall scale.

  3. As is known, analysis of \(2 \times 2\) tables for dichotomic variables leads to the following conclusion: the more unbalanced the frequencies of a diagonal are, the lower is the variance of each dichotomy, and the less reliable the relative statistical coefficients are (Gangemi 1985). This is true for the phi \((\varphi )\) coefficient which can be calculated only on dichotomies with balanced frequencies. It has been shown that the more unbalanced the frequencies are, the less reliable the phi values are, overestimating the existence of a relationship among variables which instead is not there or, if it does exist, is weak. In the case of unbalanced frequencies, the coefficient tau c can be used, whose formula is \(\tau _{c}=4(\mathrm{ad}-\mathrm{bc})/N^{2}\). It varies from +1 to \(-\)1 and therefore can be compared to \(\varphi \). If the frequencies are balanced \(\tau _{c}=\varphi \). But the more unbalanced the frequencies are and therefore the smaller the variance of each variable, the more \(\tau _{c.}\)tends to reduce its value compared to \(\varphi \), i.e. it tends to negate the existence of the relationship. In other words, it induces us to deny the existence of a relationship between variables where \(\varphi \) behaves in a less reliable manner tending toward its over estimation.

  4. In Italy, any possible assistance to the sick partner still depends on the ill partner’s family permission even in heterosexual or defacto relationships.

  5. Here the opportune use of \(\tau _\mathrm{c}\) is evident. Since the frequencies are unbalanced, \(\varphi \) assumes higher values than \(\tau _\mathrm{c} \) inducing the acceptance of a relationship, even if somewhat weak, between the variables which \(\tau _\mathrm{c} \) leads instead to exclude.

References

  • Amnesty International Report: Sesso, amore, omofobia (2004)

  • Borrillo, D.: Omofobia. Storia e critica di un pregiudizio (transl. Caiati D., Borrillo, D.: L’homophobie. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (2001)). Edizioni Dedalo, Bari (2009)

  • Borrillo, D., Fassin, E., Iacub, M. (eds.): Au-delà du PaCS. L’expertise familiale à l’épreuve de l’homosexualité. PUF, Paris (1999)

  • D’Augelli, A.R., Hershberger, S.L.: A multiyear analysis of changes in AIDS concerns and homophobia on a university campus. J. Am. Coll. Health 44, 3–10 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Augelli, A.R.: Homophobia in a university community: view of prospective resident assistants. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 30, 547–552 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, M.J.: A survey of the campus climate for lesbian, gay, and bisexual university members. J. Psychol. Hum. Sex. 8, 39–58 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S.J., Kitzinger, C., Wilkinson, S.: Attitudes towards lesbians and gay men and support for lesbian and gay human rights among psychology students. J. Homosex. 44, 121–138 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmslie, B., Tebaldi, E.: Sexual orientation and labor market discrimination. J. Labor Res. 28, 436–453 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA): Homophobia and Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the EU Member States. Part II: The Social Situation. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2009)

  • Gangemi, G.: La logica della comparazione: Controlli statistici e controlli nel disegno della ricerca. EDAS, Messina (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelbal, S., Duyan, V.: Attitudes of university students toward lesbians and gay men in Turkey. Sex Roles 55, 573–579 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G.M., Capitanio, J.P.: Black heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in the United States. J. Sex Res. 32, 95–105 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G.M.: Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: a factor analytic study. J. Homosex. 10, 39–51 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G.M.: Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: correlates and gender differences. J. Sex Res. 25, 451–477 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G.M.: Assessing heterosexuals attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: a review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In: Greene, B., Herek, G.M. (eds.) Psychological Perspectives on Lesbian and Gay Issues, v.1: Lesbian and Gay Psychology: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W.W., Ricketts, W.A.: A strategy for the measurement of homophobia. J. Homosex. 4, 357–372 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W.W., Murphy, G.J.: Liberal vs conservative orientations toward human sexual expressions. University of Hawaii School of Social Work, Honolulu (1978)

  • Kite, M.E., Whitley Jr, B.E.: Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: a meta-analysis. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22, 336–353 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M.E., Whitley Jr, B.E.: Do heterosexual women and men differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. In: Herek, G.M. (ed.) Stigma and Sexual Orientation, pp. 39–61. Sage Publications, Newbury Park (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, E.E., Klassen, A.D.: Attitudes toward homosexuality. J. Homosex. 1, 29–43 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingiardi, V., Falanga, S., D’Augelli, A.: The evaluation of homophobia in an Italian sample: an exploratory study. Arch. Sex. Behav. 34, 81–94 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumby, M.E.: Homophobia: the quest for a valid scale. J. Homosex. 2, 39–47 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malaney, G.D., Williams, E.A., Geller, W.W.: Assessing campus climate for gays, lesbians, and bisexuals at two institutions. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 38, 365–375 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Millham, J., San Miguel, C.L., Kellogg, R.: A factor analytic conceptualization of attitudes toward male and female homosexuals. J. Homosex. 2, 3–10 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mireshghi, S.I., Matsumoto, D.: Perceived cultural attitudes toward homosexuality and their effects on Iranian and American sexual minorities. Cult. Divers. Ethn. Minor. Psychol. 14, 372–376 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Money, J., Tucker, P.: Sexual Signatures: On Being a Men or a Woman. Little Brown and Company, Boston (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagtolun-An, I.G., Clair, J.M.: An experimental study of attitudes toward homosexuals. Deviant Behav. 27, 121–135 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pain, M.D., Disney, M.E.: Testing the reliability and validity of the index of attitudes toward homosexuals (IAH) in Australia. J. Homosex. 30, 99–110 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roderick, T., McCammon, S.L., Allred, L.J.: Behavioral aspects of homonegativity. J. Homosex. 36, 79–88 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakalli, N.: The relationship between sexism and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of Turkish college students. J. Homosex. 42, 53–64 (2002a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakalli, N.: Pictures of male homosexuals in the heads of Turkish college students: the effects of sex difference and social contact on stereotyping. J. Homosex. 43, 111–126 (2002b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, E.G., Hirt, J., Sears, A.: Attitudes towards homosexuals among students at a Canadian university. Sex Roles 40, 139–152 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanberg, S.L.: Attitudes towards gay men and lesbian women: instrumentation Issues. J. Homosex. 26, 99–136 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serdahely, W.J., Ziemba, G.J.: Changing homophobic attitudes through college sexuality education. J. Homosex. 10, 109–116 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, D.C., Chonody, J., Rutledge, S.E., Killian, M.: The index of attitudes toward homosexuals 30 years later: a psychometric study. Res. Soc. Work Pract. 19, 214–220 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K.T.: Homophobia: a tentative personality profile. Psychol. Rep. 29, 1091–1094 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, R.: Boyhood gender aberrations: treatment issues. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc. 26, 541–558 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S.M., Franzini, L.M.: Heteronegativism? The attitudes of gay men and lesbians toward heterosexuals. J. Homosex. 37, 65–79 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosalia Condorelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Condorelli, R. Homosexuality, homophobia and support for Lesbians and Gay human rights. Qual Quant 49, 1761–1778 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-9999-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-9999-5

Keywords

Navigation