Abstract
There is a stereotypical belief among many researchers that the social world is complex in nature, and it cannot be investigated by employing a positivist approach. While the extant body of literature mostly support this notion, this brief theoretical paper, however, presents some critical arguments against this and goes onto claim that positivism also aids our understanding of the contemporary social world to a certain extent. It has been argued that the quantifiable methods of the natural sciences are also appropriate for studying the social world in some cases, such as large-scale social surveys and cross-country social research. To begin with, a critical commentary on the history of positivism is provided and the essence of positivist epistemology in exploring different elements of the social world is then discussed. Finally, the paper establishes that both positivism and interpretivism can be seen as appropriate to some level of analysis of meaningful social action. The former is most suited for large-scale social surveys or for providing descriptive information about the social world while the latter is more appropriate to understand the complex actions of social members and to capture the multiple realities of the society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackroyd, S.: Methodology for management and organisation studies: some implications of critical realism. In: Fleetwood, S., Ackroyd, S. (eds.) Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies, pp. 130–131. Routledge, London (2004)
Alvesson, M., Sköldberg, K.: Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. Sage, London (2009)
Antonesa, M., Fallon, H., Ryan, A.B., Ryan, A., Walsh, T., Borys, L.: Researching and Writing Your Thesis: A Guide for Postgraduate Students. MACE, Maynooth (2006)
Baert, P.: Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism. Polity Press, Cambridge (2005)
Baert, P., Rubio, F.D.: Philosophy of the social sciences. In: Turner, B.S. (ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, pp. 60–80. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Chichester (2009)
Benton, T., Craib, I.: Philosophy of Social Science: The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought. Palgrave, New York (2001)
Caldwell, B.: Positivist philosophy of science and the methodology of economics. J. Econ. Issues 14(1), 53–76 (1980)
Chomsky, N.: Language and Mind. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York (1968)
Clark, A.M.: The qualitative-quantitative debate: moving from positivism and confrontation to post-positivism and reconciliation. J. Adv. Nurs. 27(6), 1242–1249 (1998)
Coffey, A.: The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. Sage, London (1999)
Crotty, M.: The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Sage Publications, London (2003)
Delanty, G.: Social Science: Beyond Constructivism and Realism. University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota (1997)
Durkheim, E.: Suicide. Allen & Unwin, London (1896/1952)
Friedman, M.: Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Giddens, A. (ed.): Positivism and Sociology. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., London (1974)
Gordon, H.S.: The History and Philosophy of Social Science. Routledge, London and New York (1991)
Halfpenny, P.: Positivism and Sociology. Allen and Unwin, London (1982)
Halfpenny, P.: Positivism in the twentieth century. In: Smart, B., Ritzer, G. (eds.) Handbook of Social Theory, pp. 371–385. Sage, London (2001)
Hanson, N.R.: Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)
Hughes, J.A., Sharrock, W.W.: The Philosophy of Social Research, 3rd edn. Addison Wesley Longman Ltd., New York (1997)
Keat, R.: Positivism and statistics in social science. In: Irvine, J., Miles, I., Evans, J. (eds.) Demystifying Social Statistics, pp. 75–86. Pluto Press, London (1979)
Knies, G.: Neighbourhood social ties: how much do residential, physical and virtual mobility matter? Br. J. Sociol. 64(3), 425–452 (2013)
Lévi-Strauss, C.: La pensée sauvage (The Savage Mind). Plon, Paris (1962)
Marx, K.: Capital: A Critique of Political Economy (vol. 1). International Publishers, New York (1967)
May, T.: Social Research: Issues. Methods and Research. Open University Press, Buckingham (2001)
McIntosh, I.: Classical Sociological Theory. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1997)
Muttarak, R., Heath, A.: Who intermarries in Britain? explaining ethnic diversity in intermarriage patterns. Br. J. of Sociol. 61(2), 275–305 (2010)
Rodwell, M.K.: Naturalistic inquiry: an alternative model for social work assessment. Soc. Serv. Rev. 61, 231–246 (1987)
Sayer, A.: Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (1992)
Stack, S., Gundlach, J.: The effect of country music on suicide. Soc. Forces 71(1), 211–218 (1992)
Toulmin, S.: The Philosophy of Science. Hutchinson House, London (1953)
Turner, J.H.: The origins of positivism: the contributions of Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer. In: Smart, B., Ritzer, G. (eds.) Handbook of Social Theory, pp. 30–42. Sage, London (2001)
Turner, J.H., Beeghley, L., Powers, C.H.: The Emergence of Sociological Theory. Sage Publications, London (2011)
Weber, M.: The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Free Press, New York (1949)
Weber, R.: Editor’s comments: the rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view. MIS Q. 28(1), 3–7 (2004)
Whitley, R.: The scientific status of management research as a practically-oriented social science. J. Manag. Stud. 21(4), 369–390 (1984)
Zammito, J.H.: A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hasan, M.N. Positivism: to what extent does it aid our understanding of the contemporary social world?. Qual Quant 50, 317–325 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0150-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0150-4