Skip to main content
Log in

Do quantum strategies always win?

  • Published:
Quantum Information Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a seminal paper, Meyer (Phys Rev Lett 82:1052, 1999) described the advantages of quantum game theory by looking at the classical penny flip game. A player using a quantum strategy can win against a classical player almost 100 % of the time. Here we make a slight modification to the quantum game, with the two players sharing an entangled state to begin with. We then analyze two different scenarios: First in which quantum player makes unitary transformations to his qubit, while the classical player uses a pure strategy of either flipping or not flipping the state of his qubit. In this case, the quantum player always wins against the classical player. In the second scenario, we have the quantum player making similar unitary transformations, while the classical player makes use of a mixed strategy wherein he either flips or not with some probability “p.” We show that in the second scenario, 100 % win record of a quantum player is drastically reduced and for a particular probability “p” the classical player can even win against the quantum player. This is of possible relevance to the field of quantum computation as we show that in this quantum game of preserving versus destroying entanglement a particular classical algorithm can beat the quantum algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisert, J., et al.: Quantum games and quantum strategies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3077 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Du, J., et al.: Experimental realization of quantum games on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 137902 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Iqbal, A.: Studies in the Theory of Quantum Games. arXiv:quant-ph/0503176

  4. Guo, H., Zhang, J., Koehler, G.J.: A survey of quantum games. Decis. Support Syst. 46, 318 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Levine, D.K.: Quantum games have no news for economists. dklevine.com/papers/quantumnonews

  6. van Enk, S.J., Pike, R.: Classical rules in quantum games. Phys. Rev. A 66, 024306 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer, D.: Quantum strategies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1052 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan, F.S., Phoenix, S.J.: Gaming the quantum. Quantum Inf. Comput. 13(3&4), 0231 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Balakrishnan, S., Sankaranarayanan, R.: Classical rules and quantum strategies in penny flip game. Quantum Inf. Process 12, 1261 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Iqbal, A., Abbott, D.: Quantum matching pennies game (cross-disciplinary physics and related areas of science and technology). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78/1, 014803 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, L.-H., et al.: Direct measurement of the concurrence of two-photon polarization-entangled states. Phys. Rev. A 88, 062342 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, Y.-F., et al.: Experimental measurement of lower and upper bounds of concurrence for mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 79, 052338 (2009)

  13. Schmid, C., et al.: Experimental direct observation of mixed state entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 260505 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Colin Benjamin would like to thank Dept. of Science and Technology (Nanomission), Govt. of India, for funding via Grant No. SR/NM/NS-1101/2011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin Benjamin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anand, N., Benjamin, C. Do quantum strategies always win?. Quantum Inf Process 14, 4027–4038 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-015-1105-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-015-1105-y

Keywords

Navigation