Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 249–258 | Cite as

Foreign aid and productivity

  • Ann Veiderpass


The Millennium Summit 2000 and the declaration of the Millennium Development Goals again brought to the fore questions on the importance of foreign aid. Consequently, the long debated question of whether or not foreign aid enhances economic growth and efficiency in resource use received renewed attention. However, consensus has still eluded researchers and policy makers. In spite of numerous studies, there is little evidence of a significant positive effect on the long-term growth of poor countries. While most previous studies have relied on simple cross country regressions, this study suggests a new approach, evaluating country performance in a production theory context using productivity as a measure, applying the non-parametric Malmquist Productivity Index and then linking this country performance to amount of foreign aid received. A balanced panel of 89 low and middle income countries from five different geographical categories is studied over a period of 11 years. By use of a novel visual test the countries are grouped into three categories, significant productivity decline, growth or no change. The different categories are based on confidence intervals resulting from bootstrapping. When linking country performance to aid in a more traditional way, a significant, but weak correlation is found.


Country comparison Aid Data envelopment analysis Malmquist Productivity Index Bootstrap Confidence intervals 

JEL Classification

D24 O57 



I am most grateful to Sverre A.C. Kittelsen and Dag Fjeld Edvardsen for computational assistance. I am also grateful to three anonymous referees and to participants in the Conference in Memory of Lennart Hjalmarsson, for constructive comments.


  1. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some methods for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30:1078–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berthélemy J-C (2006) Aid allocation: comparing donors’ behaviours. Swed Econ Policy Rev 13:77–109Google Scholar
  3. Bjurek H (1996) The Malmquist total factor productivity index. Scand J Econ 98(2):303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjurek H, Førsund FR, Hjalmarsson L (1998) Malmquist Productivity Indexes: an empirical comparison, Essay 5. In: Färe R, Grosskopf S, Russel RR (eds) Index numbers: essays in honour of Sten Malmquist. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica 50:1393–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemens M, Radelet S, Bhavani R, Bazzi S (2011) Counting chickens when they hatch; the short-term effect of aid on growth. Econ J 122:590–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall Inc., New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84(1):66–83Google Scholar
  10. Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc A 120:253–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Førsund FR (1993) Productivity growth in Norwegian Ferries. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency, techniques and applications. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Førsund FR, Kittelsen SAC, Edvardsen DF (2015) Productivity in tax offices in Norway. J Product Anal, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  13. Frisch R (1965) Theory of production. D. Reidel Publishing Company, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Gini C (1931) On the circular test of index numbers. Metron (Int Rev Stat) 35:3–24Google Scholar
  15. Grifell-Tatjé E, Lovell CAK (1995) A note on the Malmquist productivity index. Econ Lett 47:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffin KB, Enos JL (1970) Foreign assistance: objectives and consequences. Econ Dev Cult Change 18(3):313–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hjalmarsson L, Veiderpass A (1992a) Efficiency and ownership in Swedish electricity retail distribution. J Prod Anal 3(1/2):7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hjalmarsson L, Veiderpass A (1992b) Productivity in Swedish electricity retail distribution. Scand J Econ 94S:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Juselius K, Framoze Møller N, Tarp F (2013) The long-run impact of foreign aid in 36 African countries: insights from multivariate time series analysis. Oxford Bull Econ Stat. doi: 10.1111/obes.12012 Google Scholar
  20. Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica 4:209–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nehru V, Dhareshwar A (1993) A new database on physical capital stock: sources, methodology and results. Revista Análisis de Económico 8(1):37–59Google Scholar
  22. Radelet S (2006) A primer on foreign aid. Working Paper No. 92, Center for Global Development, Social Science Electronic Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Simar L, Wilson PW (1999) Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices. Eur J Oper Res 115:459–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simar L, Wilson PW (2000a) A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. J Appl Stat 27(6):779–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Simar L, Wilson PW (2000b) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: the state of the art. J Prod Anal 13:49–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Solow RA (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39(3):312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tulkens H, Van den Eeckaut P (1995) Non-frontier measures of efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: methodological aspects. Eur J Oper Res 80:474–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. UN (2004) Report of the international conference on financing for development, Monterrey, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  29. UN (2005) Investing in development: a practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Veiderpass A, Andersson P-Å (2011) Is aid the capital component making countries efficient? A non-parametric production theory approach. J Global Anal 2(1):29–47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and LawUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations