Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 339–349 | Cite as

Does recession drive convergence in firms’ productivity? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms

  • Álvaro Escribano
  • Rodolfo Stucchi


This paper provides evidence on the effect of recessions and expansions on the productivity growth rate of productivity leaders and followers. We use data of a representative sample of the Spanish manufacturing sector for the period 1991 and 2005. These data allow us to estimate firm level productivity for a relatively long period of time and provide us with firm level perception of the business cycle. We find that productivity tends to converge in recessions because, in these periods, the productivity growth of followers is higher than the productivity growth of leaders. This fact is consistent with theoretical models of managerial incentives and competition. A recession can be seen as an exogenous increase in competition that reduces demand and poses a threat of liquidation. This threat is higher for followers and is high enough to create asymmetric incentives to become more productive. We test the robustness of our results to sample selection and different productivity measure.


Productivity Business cycle Competition Convergence Recessions Spain 

JEL Classification

D22 D24 E32 L25 L60 M20 



We thank César Alonso, Eric Bartelsman, Samuel Bentolila, Juan J. Dolado, José C. Fariñas, Jesús Gonzalo, Jordi Jaumandreu, Juan Jimeno, Jacques Mairesse, Ricardo Mora, Carlos Velasco, the associate editor, two anonymous referees, and participants in seminars and conferences at Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Universidad de Oviedo, Sant’ Anna School of Advanced Studies, XXII Jornadas de Economía Industrial (Barcelona), workshop on “Entrepreneurship, Firm Demography and Industrial Location” (Vienna), and conference “Organization and Performance: Understanding the Diversity of Firms” (Tokyo) for helpful comments. Financial support from the Telefonica-UC3M Chair on Economics of Telecommunications (Escribano) and from Consejería de Educación de la Comunidad de Madrid (Stucchi) is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Baily M, Hulten C, Campbell D (1992) Productivity dynamics in manufacturing plants. Brookings papers on economic activity: microeconomics, pp 187–267Google Scholar
  2. Baily M, Bartelsman E, Haltiwanger J (2001) Labor productivity: structural change and cyclical dynamics. Rev Econ Stat 83(3):420–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlevy G (2007) On the cyclicality of research and development. Am Econ Rev 94:1131–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100(2):223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartelsman E, Dhrymes P (1998) Productivity dynamics: U.S. manufacturing plants, 1972–1986. J Prod Anal 9:5–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartelsman EJ, Doms M (2000) Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata. J Econ Lit 38(3):569–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basu S (1996) Procyclical productivity: increasing returns or cyclical utilization. Quart J Econ 111(3):719–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu S, Fernald J (2001) Why is productivity procyclical? Why do we care? In: Hulten CR, Dean ER, Harper M (eds) New developments in productivity analysis. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 225–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Q J Econ 122(4):1351–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caree M, Klomp L (1997) Testing the convergence hypothesis: a comment. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):683–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chevalier P, Lecat R, Oulton N (2009) Convergence de la productivité des entreprises, globalisation, technologies de l’information et concurrence. Econ Stat 419(419–420):101–124Google Scholar
  12. Delgado M, Fariñas J, Ruano S (2002) Firm productivity and export markets: a non-parametric approach. J Int Econ 57(2):397–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolado J, Ortigueira S, Stucchi R (2012) Does dual employment protection affect TFP? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. CEPR discussion paper DP8763Google Scholar
  14. Doraszelski U, Jaumandreu J (2013) R&D and productivity: estimating endogenous productivity. Rev Econ Stud, ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  15. Escribano A, Stucchi R (2011) Catching-up in total factor productivity through the business cycle: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. IMDEA working paper series in economics and social science 2011-10Google Scholar
  16. Fariñas JC, Ruano S (2005) Firm productivity, heterogeneity, sunk costs and market selection. Int J Ind Organ 23:505–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferraz E, Ortega E (2006) Características cíclicas de la economía española en el periodo 1980–2005. Bank of Spain, Boletín Econ 77Google Scholar
  18. Foster L, Haltiwanger J, Syverson C (2008) Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: selection on productivity or profitability? Am Econ Rev 98(1):394–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fung M (2005) Are knowledge spillovers driving the convergence of productivity among firms? Economica 72:287–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geroski P, Walters CF (1995) Innovative activity over the business cycle. Econ J 105(431):916–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Girma S, Kneller R (2005) Convergence in the UK service sector: firm level evidence, 1988–1998. Scott J Polit Econ 52(5):736–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huergo E, Jaumandreu J (2004) Firms’ age, process innovation and productivity growth. Int J Ind Organ 22:541–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iacovone L, Crespi G (2010) Catching up with the technological frontier: micro-level evidence on growth and convergence. Ind Corp Chang 19(6):2073–2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70:317–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lopez-García P, Puente S, Gómez AL (2007) Firm productivity dynamics in Spain. Documentos de Trabajo 0739, Bank of SpainGoogle Scholar
  27. Martín-Marcos A, Suarez C (1997) El Stock de Capital para las Empresas de la Encuesta sobre Estrategias Empresariales. Discussion paper 13, Documento Interno PIE-FEP. Serie: Construcción de VariablesGoogle Scholar
  28. Olley GS, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ornaghi C (2006) Spillovers in product and process innovation: evidence from manufacturing firms. Int J Ind Organ 24:349–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oulton N (1998) Competition and the dispersion of labour productivity among UK companies. Oxf Econ Pap 50(1):23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt K (1997) Managerial incentives and product market competition. Rev Econ Stud 64(2):191–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmitz JA Jr (2005) What determines productivity? Lessons from the dramatic recovery of the U.S. and Canadian iron ore industries following their early 1980s crisis. J Polit Econ 113(3):582–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Syverson C (2004) Market structure and productivity: a concrete example. J Polit Econ 112(6):1181–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Syverson C (2011) What determines productivity? J Econ Lit 49(2):326–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversidad Carlos III de MadridGetafe, MadridSpain
  2. 2.Office of Strategic Planning and Development EffectivenessInter-American Development BankProvidenciaChile

Personalised recommendations