Advertisement

Precision Agriculture

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 278–294 | Cite as

What relevant information can be identified by experts on unmanned aerial vehicles’ visible images for precision viticulture?

  • Leo PichonEmail author
  • Corentin Leroux
  • Catherine Macombe
  • James Taylor
  • Bruno Tisseyre
Article
  • 176 Downloads

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) offer interesting alternatives to satellites or airplanes regarding flight agility and image resolution. These sensor platforms may well be used to monitor vines field all throughout the vine’s growing season at a very high spatial resolution. They could provide useful information, different to that normally considered in the literature. To identify the possible uses of UAV images in viticulture, a specific exploratory survey was put into place. This study aimed at identifying (i) relevant information that growers and advisers (G&A) can extract from UAV images and (ii) the added value that this information can have for both G&A’s vineyard management decisions. This approach was conducted on an 11.3 ha commercial vineyard with soil, climate and a training system representative of vineyards in the south of France. UAV-based visible images (25 mm resolution) were acquired every two weeks from budburst to harvest by several UAV companies. Images were shown to a panel of G&As over six sessions during the growing season. Each of these sessions consisted of (i) an individual period during which images were first presented one at a time to each expert and then all together in chronological order from budburst to harvest, and (ii) a collective period during which G&As were asked to share and discuss their point of view. In this exploratory survey, the application of the proposed methodology demonstrated that most of the information on vine status, soil and vineyard environment could be extracted from UAV-based visible images by the experts, thus showing high interest in developing specific image processing techniques to extract this information from images. Results showed that this information was of great interest throughout the growing cycle of the vine, particularly for advisers, as a support to drive management strategies. The outputs of this exploratory study should be confirmed in other contexts than the Languedoc, France region to extrapolate the observed conclusions.

Keywords

Industry view Visible images Decision making Expertise gathering 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was carried out thanks to the support of the company Chair AgroSYS of Montpellier SupAgro (https://www.supagro.fr/wordpress/agrosys/). We thank the Laroche wines winery, part of Advini group, and owner of the vineyards of the study. We also thank the UAV companies Aerotec solution, Atlas, Airinov, Cyleone, Format Drone, Decidrone, and Geofalco for participating in this work without charge.

References

  1. Andersen, D. F., Vennix, J. A. M., Richardson, G. P., & Rouwette, E. A. J. A. (2017). Group model building: Problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(5), 691–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baluja, J., Diago, M. P., Balda, P., Zorer, R., Meggio, F., Morales, F., et al. (2012). Assessment of vineyard water status variability by thermal and multispectral imagery using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Irrigation Science, 30(6), 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benzecri, J. P. (1973). Data analysis, T. 2, The factorial analysys. Paris, France: Ed. Dunod.Google Scholar
  4. Bouadi, T., Cordier, M. O., Moreau, P., Quiniou, R., Salmon-Monviola, J., & Gascuel-Odoux, C. (2017). A data warehouse to explore multidimensional simulated data from a spatially distributed agro-hydrological model to improve catchment nitrogen management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 97, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boulil, K., Pinet, F., Bimonte, S., Carluer, N., Lauvernet, C., Cheviron, B., et al. (2013). Guaranteeing the quality of multidimensional analysis in data warehouses of simulation results: Application to pesticide transfer data produced by the MACRO model. Ecological Informatics, 16, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgos, S., Mota, M., Noll, D., & Cannelle, B. (2015). Use of very high-resolution airborne images to analyse 3D canopy architecture of a vineyard. International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40, 399–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Comba, L., Gay, P., Primicerio, J., & Aimonino, D. R. (2015). Vineyard detection from unmanned aerial systems images. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 114, 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coombe, B. G. (1995). Adoption of a system for identifying grapevine growth stages. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 1, 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Gennaro, S., Battiston, E., Di Marco, S., Facini, O., Matese, A., Nocentini, M., et al. (2016). Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based remote sensing to monitor grapevine leaf stripe disease within a vineyard affected by esca complex. Phytopathologia Mediterranea, 55(2), 262–275.Google Scholar
  10. Diago, M. P., Pou, A., Millan, B., Tardaguila, J., Fernandes, A. M., & Melo-Pinto, P. (2014). Assessment of grapevine water status from hyperspectral imaging of leaves. Acta Horticulturae, 1038, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drost, E. (2011). Validity and Reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38, 105–124.Google Scholar
  12. Hardie, W. J., & Martin, S. R. (2000). Shoot growth on de-fruited grapevines: A physiological indicator for irrigation scheduling. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 6(1), 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasbari, M., & Leroux, B. (2016). Methodology for the use of a category E UAV for the detection of flavescence dorée. Cahier des techniques de l’INRA, Mesure et métrologie, 1(2), 30–35.Google Scholar
  14. Matese, A., Primicerio, J., Di Gennaro, F., Fiorillo, E., Vaccari, F. P., & Genesio, L. (2013). Development and application of an autonomous and flexible unmanned aerial vehicle for precision viticulture. Acta Horticulturae, 978, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mathews, A., & Jensen, J. (2013). Visualizing and quantifying vineyard canopy LAI using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) collected high density structure from motion point cloud. Remote Sensing, 5(5), 2164–2183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nilakanta, S., Scheibe, K., & Rai, A. (2008). Dimensional issues in agricultural data warehouse designs. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 60, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Panebianco, S., Pahl-Wostl, C., (2004) Obstacles in Launching a Participatory Group Discussion and Modelling Process. In Pahl, C., Schmidt, S., Rizzoli, A. E, Jakeman, A. J. (Eds.) IEMSs’04. Transactions of the 2nd International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Manno, Switzerland: International Environmental Modelling and Software Society publisher, Vol. 1, pp. 240–246.Google Scholar
  18. Primicerio, J., Caruso, G., Comba, L., Crisci, A., Gay, P., Guidoni, S., et al. (2017). Individual plant definition and missing plant characterization in vineyards from high-resolution UAV imagery. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 50(1), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Prosser, J. (1998). Image-based research: A handbook for qualitative researchers. London, UK: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  20. R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
  21. Rey, C., Martin, M. P., Lobo, A., Luna, I., Diago, M. P., Millan, B., et al. (2013). Multispectral imagery acquired from a UAV to assess the spatial variability of a Tempranillo vineyard. In Stafford, J. V. (Ed.) Precision agriculture’13. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, pp 617–624. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Santesteban, L. G., Di Gennaro, S. F., Herrero-Langreo, A., Miranda, C., Royo, J. B., & Matese, A. (2017). High-resolution UAV-based thermal imaging to estimate the instantaneous and seasonal variability of plant water status within a vineyard. Agricultural Water Management, 183, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Social Service Review, 76(3), 510–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wacheux, F. (1996). Qualitative methods and research in management. Paris, France: Economica.Google Scholar
  25. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed., p. 282). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Guillén-Climent, M. L., Hernández-Clemente, R., Catalina, A., González, M. R., & Martín, P. (2013). Estimating leaf carotenoid content in vineyards using high resolution hyperspectral imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 171, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITAP, Montpellier SupAgro, Irstea, Univ MontpellierMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.SMAGMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations