Advertisement

Hedonic modeling of commercial property values: distance decay from the links and nodes of rail and highway infrastructure

  • Kihwan Seo
  • Deborah Salon
  • Michael Kuby
  • Aaron Golub
Article

Abstract

This study investigates the impacts of positive and negative externalities of highways and light rail on commercial property values in Phoenix, Arizona. We hypothesize that the positive externality (i.e., accessibility) of highway and light rail accrues at exits and stations, whereas nodes and links of highways and light rail emanate negative effects. Positive and negative effects decay with increasing distance and are captured by multiple distance bands. Hypotheses are tested using a spatial error regression model. Results show that commercial property values are positively and significantly associated with the accessibility benefits of transport nodes. The distance-band coefficients form a typical distance decay curve for both modes with no detectable disamenity donut effect immediately around the nodes. Unexpectedly, impacts of light rail stations extend farther than those of highway exits. Only the links of light rail are negatively associated with property values, as hypothesized. When the sample is subdivided by type of commercial property, the magnitude and distance extent of impacts are surprisingly consistent, with light rail stations having stronger impacts than highway exits on all three classes of commercial property: industrial, office, and retail and service. Rail links have a significant negative relationship with price for all three types of commercial property, but highways have a significant negative relationship only with industrial properties.

Keywords

Highway Light rail Spatial error model Node Link Commercial property value 

References

  1. Alonso, W.: Location and Land Use. Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Harvard University Press, Harvard (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin, L.: Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin, L., Rey, S.J.: Modern Spatial Econometrics in Practice: A Guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL. GeoDa Press, Chicago (2014)Google Scholar
  4. Arizona Department of Revenue: Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal Systems-Residential Property. https://www.azdor.gov/Portals/0/Brochure/546.pdf (2009). Accessed 04 February 2015
  5. Bateman, I., Day, B., Lake, L., Lovett, A.: The Effect of Road Traffic on Residential Property Values: A Literature Review and Hedonic Pricing Study 207. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh (2001)Google Scholar
  6. Billings, S.B.: Estimating the value of a new transit option. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 41(6), 525–536 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollinger, C.R., Ihlanfeldt, K.R., Bowes, D.R.: Spatial variation in office rents within the Atlanta region. Urban Stud. 35(7), 1097–1118 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brennan, T.P., Cannaday, R.E., Colwell, P.F.: Office rent in the Chicago CBD. Real Estate Econ. 12(3), 243–260 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cervero, R., Duncan, M.: Transit’s value-added effects: light and commuter rail services and commercial land values. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1805(1), 8–15 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Champ, P.A., Bolye, K.J., Brown, T.C.: A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clapp, J.M.: The intrametropolitan location of office activities. J. Reg. Sci. 20(3), 387–399 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colliers International: Research & Forecast Report. Q3 Greater Phoenix|Industrial. http://www.colliers.com/-/media/files/marketresearch/unitedstates/markets/greater%20phoenix/q3-2015/q3-2015-greater-phoenix-industrial-market-report.pdf (2015). Accessed 30 November 2015
  13. Damm, D., Lerman, S.R., Lerner-Lam, E., Young, J.: Response of urban real estate values in anticipation of the Washington Metro. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 14, 315–336 (1980)Google Scholar
  14. Debrezion, G., Pels, E., Rietveld, P.: The impact of railway stations on residential and commercial property value: a meta-analysis. J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 35(2), 161–180 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Vany, A.S.: An economic model of airport noise pollution in an urban environment. In: Lin, S.A.Y. (ed.) Theory and Measurement of Economic Externalities, pp. 205–214. Academic Press, New York (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunse, N., Jones, C.: A hedonic price model of office rents. J. Prop. Valuat. Invest. 16(3), 297–312 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glascock, J.L., Jahanian, S., Sirmans, C.F.: An analysis of office market rents: some empirical evidence. Real Estate Econ. 18(1), 105–119 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Golub, A., Guhathakurta, S., Sollapuram, B.: Spatial and temporal capitalization effects of light rail in Phoenix: from conception, planning, and construction to operation. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 32(4), 415–429 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ihlanfeldt, K.R., Martinez-Vazquez, J.: Alternative value estimates of owner-occupied housing: evidence on sample selection bias and systematic errors. J. Urban Econ. 20(3), 356–369 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Landis, J., Loutzenheiser, D.: BART Access and Office Building Performance. University of California Transportation Center, California (1995)Google Scholar
  21. LeSage, J., Pace, R.K.: Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mills, E.S.: Office rent determinants in the Chicago area. Real Estate Econ. 20(2), 273–287 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nelson, J.P.: Highway noise and property values: a survey of recent evidence. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 16(2), 117–138 (1982)Google Scholar
  24. Partridge, M.D., Boarnet, M., Brakman, S., Ottaviano, G.: Introduction: whither spatial econometrics? J. Reg. Sci. 52(2), 167–171 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson, G.E.: Unlocking Land Values to Finance Urban Infrastructure. The World Bank, Washington, DC (2009)Google Scholar
  26. Ryan, S.: The value of access to highways and light rail transit: evidence for industrial and office firms. Urban Stud. 42(4), 751–764 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salon, D., Jingyan W., Sharon S.: Impact of bus rapid transit and metro rail on property values in Guangzhou, China. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2452, 36–45 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Seo, K., Golub, A., Kuby, M.: Combined impacts of highways and light rail transit on residential property values: a spatial hedonic price model for Phoenix, Arizona. J. Transp. Geogr. 41, 53–62 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sivitanidou, R.: Urban spatial variations in office-commercial rents: the role of spatial amenities and commercial zoning. J. Urban Econ. 38(1), 23–49 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sivitanidou, R.: Do office–commercial firms value access to service employment centers? A hedonic value analysis within polycentric Los Angeles. J. Urban Econ. 40(2), 125–149 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sivitanidou, R., Sivitanides, P.: The intrametropolitan distribution of R&D activities: theory and empirical evidence. J. Reg. Sci. 35(3), 391–416 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. U.S. Census Bureau: State and County QuickFacts: Phoenix, Arizona. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/04/0455000.html (2010). Accessed 10 May 2013
  33. Vessali, K.V.: Land use impacts of rapid transit: a review of empirical literature. Berkeley Plan. J. 11, 71–105 (1996)Google Scholar
  34. Weber, A., Friedrich, C.J.: Alfred Weber’s Theory of the Location of Industries. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1929)Google Scholar
  35. Weinberger, R.R.: Light rail proximity: benefit or detriment in the case of Santa Clara County, California? Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1747(1), 104–113 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wheaton, W.C., Torto, R.G.: Office rent indices and their behavior over time. J. Urban Econ. 35, 121–139 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao, Z., Iacono, M., Lari, A., Levinson, D.: Value capture for transportation finance. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 48, 435–448 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kihwan Seo
    • 1
  • Deborah Salon
    • 2
  • Michael Kuby
    • 2
  • Aaron Golub
    • 3
  1. 1.Korea Research Institute for Human SettlementsSejong-siSouth Korea
  2. 2.School of Geographical Sciences and Urban PlanningArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and PlanningPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations