The Demographic Foundations of Rising Employment and Earnings among Single Mothers in Canada and the United States, 1980–2000

  • John Myles
  • Feng Hou
  • Garnett Picot
  • Karen Myers


Despite comparatively modest welfare reforms in Canada relative to those of the United States, employment rates and earnings among single mothers have risen by virtually identical magnitudes in the two countries since 1980. We show that most of the gains in Canada and a substantial share of the change in the US were the result of the dynamics of cohort replacement and population aging as the large and better educated baby boom generation replaced earlier cohorts and began entering their forties. In both countries, demographic effects were the main factor accounting for higher employment and earnings among older (40+) single mothers. Changes among younger single mothers, in contrast, were mainly the result of changes in labor market behavior and other unmeasured variables. Overall, demographic changes dominated in Canada but not in the US for two reasons: (a) Canadian single mothers are significantly older than their US counterparts; and (b) consistent with the welfare reform thesis, the magnitude of behavioral change among younger single mothers was much larger in the US.


Female single parents Employment rate Earnings 


  1. Baker, M., Gruber, J., & Milligan, K. (2005). Universal childcare, maternal labor supply and family well-being. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper No. 11832.Google Scholar
  2. Blank, R. M. (2002). Evaluating welfare reform in the United States. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(4), 1105–1166. doi: 10.1257/002205102762203576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blank, R. M., & Hanratty, M. J. (1993). Responding to need: A comparison of social safety nets in Canada and the United States. In D. Card & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Small differences that matter: Labor markets and income maintenance in Canada and the United States (pp. 191–231). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, F., & Graham, J. (1990). Black-White differences in wealth and asset composition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2), 321–339. doi: 10.2307/2937789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. The Journal of Human Resources, 8(3), 436–455. doi: 10.2307/144855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouderbat, B., Lemieux, T., & Riddell, W.·C. (Forthcoming). Recent trends in wage inequality and the wage structure in Canada. In D. Green & J. Kesselman (Eds.), Dimensions of inequality in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  7. Card, D., & DiNardo, J. (2002). Skill-biased technological change and rising wage inequality: Some problems and puzzles. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(4), 733–783. doi: 10.1086/342055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies, S., & Guppy, N. (2006). The schooled society: An introduction tot the sociology of education. Don MillsGoogle Scholar
  9. Dooley, M. (1994). The converging market work patterns of married mothers and lone mothers in Canada. The Journal of Human Resources, 29(2), 600–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dooley, M. (1999). The evolution of welfare participation among Canadian lone mothers, 1973–1991. The Canadian Journal of Economics. Revue Canadienne d’Economique, 32(3), 589–612. doi: 10.2307/136439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dooley, M., & Finnie, R. (2001). Differences in labor force participation, earnings and welfare participation among Canadian lone mothers: A longitudinal data analysis. Applied Research Branch Strategic Policy. Working paper no. SP–479-01-02E. Ottawa: Human Resources Development Canada.Google Scholar
  12. Eissa, N., & Liebman, J. (1996). Labor supply response to the earned income tax credit. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, CXI, 605–637. doi: 10.2307/2946689.
  13. Ellwood, D., & Jencks, C. (2004). The uneven spread of single-parent families: What do we know? Where do we look for answers? In K. M. Neckerman (Ed.), Social Inequality (pp. 3–78). New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Even, W. E., & Macpherson, D. A. (1994). Employer size and compensation: The role of worker characteristics. Applied Economics, 26(9), 897–907. doi: 10.1080/00036849400000051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fang, H., & Keane, M. P. (2004). Assessing the impact of welfare reform on single mothers. Yale University: Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  16. Frenette, M. (2005). Is post-secondary access more equitable in Canada or the United States? Analytical Studies Research Paper Series. Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11F0019MIE No. 244. Ottawa ON: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Grogger, J. (2003). The effects of time limits, the EITC and other policy changes on welfare use, work and income among female-headed households. The Review of Economics and Statistics, (May), 394–408. doi: 10.1162/003465303765299891.
  18. Green, B. (2004). Background material and data on the programs within the jurisdiction of the committee on ways and means. Committee on Ways and Means US House of Representatives.Google Scholar
  19. Hanratty, M., & Blank, R. (1992). Down and out in North America: Recent trends in poverty rates in the United States and Canada. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 233–254. doi: 10.2307/2118328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Juby, H., Le Bourdais, C., & Marcil-Gratton, N. (2003). Linking family change, parents’ employment and income and children’s economic well-being: A longitudinal perspective. An analysis of the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.Google Scholar
  21. Lefebvre, P., & Merrigan, P. (2005). Low-fee ($5/day/child) regulated childcare policy and the labor supply of mothers with young children: A natural experiment from Canada. Université du Québec à Montréal, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  22. McMullin, J. A., Davies, L., & Cassidy, G. (2002). Welfare reform in Ontario: Tough times in mothers lives. Canadian Public Policy, XXVIII(2), 297–313. doi: 10.2307/3552330.
  23. Mendelson, M. (2003). Child benefits levels in 2003 and beyond: Australia, Canada, the UK and the US. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
  24. Meyer, B., & Rosenbaum, D. (2001). Welfare, the earned income tax credit, and the labor supply of single mothers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (August), 1063–1114. doi: 10.1162/00335530152466313.
  25. Moffit, R. A. (1999). New developments in econometric methods for labor market analysis. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics 3A (pp. 1367–1397). NY: Elsevier. Chapter 24.Google Scholar
  26. Myles, J., & Pierson, P. (1997). Friedman’s revenge: The reform of liberal welfare states in Canada and the United States. Politics & Society, 25, 443–472. doi: 10.1177/0032329297025004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oaxaca, R. L. (1973). Male–female wage differences in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709. doi: 10.2307/2525981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rainwater, L., & Smeeding, T. M. (2003). Poor kids in a rich country. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Myles
    • 1
  • Feng Hou
    • 2
  • Garnett Picot
    • 2
  • Karen Myers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of TorontoToronto Canada
  2. 2.Business and Labour Market Analysis DivisionStatistics CanadaOttawa Canada

Personalised recommendations