Basic Personal Values Underlie and Give Coherence to Political Values: A Cross National Study in 15 Countries
- 1.8k Downloads
Do the political values of the general public form a coherent system? What might be the source of coherence? We view political values as expressions, in the political domain, of more basic personal values. Basic personal values (e.g., security, achievement, benevolence, hedonism) are organized on a circular continuum that reflects their conflicting and compatible motivations. We theorize that this circular motivational structure also gives coherence to political values. We assess this theorizing with data from 15 countries, using eight core political values (e.g., free enterprise, law and order) and ten basic personal values. We specify the underlying basic values expected to promote or oppose each political value. We offer different hypotheses for the 12 non-communist and three post-communist countries studied, where the political context suggests different meanings of a basic or political value. Correlation and regression analyses support almost all hypotheses. Moreover, basic values account for substantially more variance in political values than age, gender, education, and income. Multidimensional scaling analyses demonstrate graphically how the circular motivational continuum of basic personal values structures relations among core political values. This study strengthens the assumption that individual differences in basic personal values play a critical role in political thought.
KeywordsPolitical values Basic personal values Value coherence Structure of political thought
This paper was partly supported by the HSE Basic Research Program (International Laboratory of Socio-cultural Research).
This research complies with the laws of the countries in which it was conducted.
- Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Ashton, M. C., Danso, H. A., Maio, G. R., Esses, V. M., Bond, M. H., & Keung, D. K. Y. (2005). Two dimensions of political attitudes and their individual difference correlates: A cross-cultural perspective. In R. M. Sorrentino, D. Cohen, J. M. Olson, & M. Zanna (Eds.), Culture social behavior: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 10, pp. 1–29). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Buksinski, T. (2003). Liberalisation and transformation of morality in post-Communist countries: Polish philosophical studies, IV. Washington: The Council for Research in Values & Philosophy.Google Scholar
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Feldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology, and structure of political attitudes. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477–508). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gunther, R., & Kuan, H. C. (2007). Value cleavages and partisan conflict. In R. Gunther, J. R. Montero, & H. J. Puhle (Eds.), Electoral intermediation, values, and political support in old and new democracies: Europe, East Asia, and the Americas in comparative perspective (pp. 255–320). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gunther, R., Montero, J. R., & Puhle, H. J. (2007). Op. cit. Google Scholar
- Heath, A., Jowell, R., & Curtice, J. (1985). How Britain votes. Oxford: Pergamum.Google Scholar
- Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 778–867). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. II (3rd ed., pp. 659–741). NY: Random House.Google Scholar
- Kirisci, K. (2003). Turkey: A transformation from emigration to immigration. Washington: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
- Lee, M., Whitehead, J., Ntoumanis, N., & Hatzigeorgiadis, A. (2008). Relationships among values, achievement orientations and attitudes in youth sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 588–610.Google Scholar
- Mitra, P., & Ruslan, Y. (2007). Increasing inequality in transition economies: Is there more to come? In F. Bourguignon & B. Pleskovic (Eds.), Annual world bank conference on development economics, regional: beyond transition (pp. 59–102). Washington: The International bank for reconstruction and development/the world bank.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- No shooting please, we’re German. (2012). The Economist. Retrieved July, 27, 2013 from http://www.economist.com/node/21564617.
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Rose, R. (1997). How patient are people in post-communist societies? World Affairs, 159, 130–144.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Value orientations. European Social Survey Core Questionnaire Development, Chapter 07. Retrieved from http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=83&Itemid=80..
- Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications [Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 47, 249–288.Google Scholar
- van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar