Abstract
Recent analyses have demonstrated that personality affects political behavior. According to the mediation hypothesis, the effect of personality on political participation is mediated by classical predictors, such as political interest, internal efficacy, political discussion, or the sense that voting is a civic duty. This paper outlines various paths that link personality traits to two participatory activities: voter turnout in European Parliament elections and participation in protest actions. The hypotheses are tested with data from a large, nationally representative, face-to-face survey of the Spanish population conducted before and after the 2009 European Parliament elections using log-linear path models that are well suited to study indirect relationships. The results clearly confirm that the effects of personality traits on voter turnout and protest participation are sizeable but indirect. They are mediated by attitudinal predictors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The sample was stratified to autonomous region and size of municipality. Municipalities were selected randomly as primary sampling units, and from those sections were selected with probability proportional to size. In the final stage a person was selected by performing a random walk through the section with quota on age and sex. The interviews were administered by an interviewer in the person's home. In the analyses that follow poststratification weights provided by the CIS are always applied. They weight for autonomous region, city size, sex, and age.
Missing data were dealt with by the full-information maximum likelihood estimator employed by Latent Gold under the assumption of missing at random (MAR). Estimation proceeded by EM iterations, after which the algorithm switched to Newton–Raphson until convergence was attained. Before iterations, 10 random sets of starting values were generated and iterated by EM. From these 10 resulting estimates the set with the highest likelihood was chosen as a starting point for iterations.
The full estimates and the Latent Gold output are available as an Online Appendix given under Supplementary material.
References
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Allik, J., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Toward a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 13–28.
Beier, M. E., & Ackerman, P. L. (2001). Current-events knowledge in adults: An investigation of age, intelligence, and nonability determinants. Psychology and Aging, 16(4), 615–628.
Bekkers, R. (2005). Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political Psychology, 26(3), 439–454.
Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729–750.
Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (2000). Toward the development of quasi-indigenous personality constructs: Measuring los cinco grandes in Spain with indigenous Castilian markers. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(1), 141.
Berry, W. D., DeMeritt, J. H. R., & Esarey, J. (2010). Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential? American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 248–266.
Blais, A. (2010). Political participation. In L. LeDuc, R. G. Niemi, & P. Norris (Eds.), Contemporary democracies 3 (pp. 165–183). London: Sage.
Blais, A., & Labbe-St-Vincent, S. (2011). Personality traits, political attitudes and the propensity to vote. European Journal of Political Research, 50(3), 395–417.
Buse, A. (1982). The likelihood ratio, Wald, and Lagrange multiplier tests: An expository note. The American Statistician, 36, 153–157.
Caspi, A., & Roberts, B. W. (2001). Personality development across the life course: The argument for change and continuity. Psychological Inquiry, 12(2), 49–66.
Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender Differences in Personality Traits Across Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 322–331.
Croon, M. A. (1990). Latent class analysis with ordered latent classes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43(2), 171–192.
Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Motivational individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1285–1302.
Denny, K., & Doyle, O. (2008). Political interest, cognitive ability and personality: Determinants of voter turnout in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 291–310.
Diani, M. (2004). Networks and participation. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. P. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 339–359). London: Blackwell.
Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(01), 33–48.
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., Raso, C., & Ha, S. E. (2011). Personality traits and participation in political processes. The Journal of Politics, forthcoming.
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Huberty, D., & Dowling, C. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 111–133.
Goodman, L. A. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(367), 537–552.
Hagenaars, J. A. (1993). Loglinear models with latent variables. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hagenaars, J. A., & McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hambrick, D. Z., et al. (2008). The roles of ability, personality, and interests in acquiring current events knowledge: A longitudinal study. Intelligence, 36(3), 261–278.
Hampson, S. E., & Goldberg, L. R. (2006). A first large cohort study of personality trait stability over the 40 years between elementary school and midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 763.
Heine, S. J., & Buchtel, E. E. (2009). Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 369–394.
Heinen, T. (1996). Latent class and discrete latent trait models: Similarities and differences. Sage Publications Inc.
Hibbing, M. V., Ritchie, M., & Anderson, M. R. (2011). Personality and political discussion. Political Behavior. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9147-4.
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kitts, J. A. (2000). Mobilizing in black boxes: Social networks and participation in social movement organizations. Mobilization, 5, 241–257.
Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations and barriers. American Sociological Review, 52, 519–531.
Krueger, R. F., & Johnson, W. (2008). Behavioral genetics and personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 287–310). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Lane, R. E. (1955). Political personality and electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 49(1), 173–190.
Levinson, D. J. (1958). The relevance of personality for political-participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 22, 3–10.
Lodi-Smith, J., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 68.
Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and environment in personality development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mansbridge, J. (1980). Beyond adversary democracy. New York: Basic Books.
McClosky, Herbert. (1958). Conservatism and personality. The American Political Science Review, 52(1), 27–45.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516.
McCrae, R. R., et al. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and lifespan development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173–186.
McCrae, R. R., et al. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561.
Medland, Sarah. E., & Hatemi, Peter. K. (2009). Political science, behavior genetics and twin studies: A methodological primer. Political Analysis, 17, 191–214.
Milbrath, L. W. (1965). Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics?. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.
Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mondak, J. J., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Hibbing, M. V. (2011). The participatory personality: Evidence from Latin America. British Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 211–221.
Mondak, J. J., & Halperin, K. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 335–362.
Mondak, Hibbing, J. J. M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 85–110.
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research [with discussion]. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 111–195). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212.
Rizopoulos, D. (2009). ltm: Latent Trait Models under IRT. R package. Version 0.9-3, 9 December 2009.
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K., & Bogg, T. (2005). Conscientiousness and health across the life course. Review of General Psychology, 9, 156–168.
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.
Schmitt, D. P., et al. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 173.
Schmitt, D. P., et al. (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(1), 168.
Sniderman, P. M. (1975). Personality and democratic politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Terracciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2009). Intra-individual change in personality stability and age. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 1–37.
Terracciano, A., et al. (2005). National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310, 96–100.
Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2001). Who is that (wo)man in the street? From the normalisation of protest to the normalisation of the protester. European Journal of Political Research, 39(4), 461–486.
Van der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(11), 1–19.
Vecchione, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of political participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 487–492.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2000). Latent Gold user’s guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Technical guide for Latent GOLD 4.0: Basic and advanced. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.
Wolak, J., & Marcus, G. E. (2007). Personality and emotional response: Strategic and tactical responses to changing political circumstances. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 614(1), 172.
Yamagata, S., et al. (2006). Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 987.
Acknowledgments
We thank the anonymous reviewers and the editors whose careful comments grealy helped improving the manuscript. For comments on previous versions we thank André Blais, Karen Jusko and the participants of the 2010 ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops on Personality and Voter Turnout, the 2010 ISPP Conference, and the Research Forum at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra. The paper would not have been possible without the support of the Spanish Centro de Investigaciones Sociologicas, the European Science Foundation (07-HumVIB-FP-004 “Voter turnout and abstention in context”), and the Research and Expertise Center for Survey Methodology at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra. The usual caveat applies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix: Question Wording of English Original Ten-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10)
Appendix: Question Wording of English Original Ten-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10)
Personality (BFI-10)
I see myself as someone who
-
… is reserved
-
… is generally trusting
-
… tends to be lazy
-
… is relaxed, handles stress well
-
… has few artistic interests
-
… is outgoing, sociable
-
… tends to find fault with others
-
… does a thorough job
-
… gets nervous easily
-
… has an active imagination
-
Disagree strongly (0)
-
Disagree a little (1)
-
Neither agree nor disagree (2)
-
Agree a little (3)
-
Agree strongly (4)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gallego, A., Oberski, D. Personality and Political Participation: The Mediation Hypothesis. Polit Behav 34, 425–451 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9168-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9168-7