Political Behavior

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 249–276 | Cite as

A Two-edged Sword: The Differential Effect of Religious Belief and Religious Social Context on Attitudes towards Democracy

Original Paper

Abstract

Different components of the religious experience have differing effects on attitudes towards democracy. Using heteroskedastic maximum likelihood models and data from the fourth wave of the World Values Survey for 45 democratic countries, we show that as a personal belief system, religiosity contrasts with democratic principles, generating opposition to democracy while increasing ambivalence towards democratic principles among religious people. Nevertheless, at the group level, religion also serves as a social institution which increases the homogeneity of one’s social network, leading to lower ambivalence, and makes for an active minority group which benefits from the democratic framework, consequently increasing support overall for a democratic regime. This double-edged sword effect explains the mixed results currently found in the literature on religiosity and democracy, and clearly illustrates the multidimensionality of religiosity.

Keywords

Religious belief Religious behavior Democratic attitudes Ambivalence World Values Survey Heteroskedastic maximum likelihood models 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the editors for their insightful readings and constructive suggestions. All remaining errors are our own.

References

  1. Aaron, S. J. (2009). Emulating Azariah: Evangelicals and social change in the Dangs. In D. H. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Evangelical christianity and democracy in Asia (pp. 83–131). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, N. R. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  3. Altemeyer, R. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez, M. R., & Brehm, J. (1995). American ambivalence toward abortion policy: Development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 1055–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alvarez, M. R., & Brehm, J. (1997). Are Americans ambivalent towards racial policies? American Journal of Political Science, 92(2), 345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alvarez, M. R., & Brehm, J. (2002). Hard choices. Easy Answers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, J. (2004). Does God matter, and if so, whose God? Religion and democratization. Democratization, 11(4), 197–217.Google Scholar
  8. Barnea, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barro, R. J., & McCleary, R. M. (2003a). Religion and economic growth across countries. American Sociological Review, 68(5), 760–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barro, R. J., & McCleary, R. M. (2003b). International determinants of religiosity. NBER Working Paper No. w10147.Google Scholar
  11. Basinger, S. J., & Lavine, H. (2005). Ambivalence, information, and electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beit-Hallahmi, B., & Argyle, M. (1997). The psychology of religious behavior. Belief, and experience. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Ben-Nun Bloom, P., Zemach, M., & Arian, A. (2011). Religiosity and democratic performance evaluation. Democratization, 18(1), 25–51.Google Scholar
  14. Bollen, K. A., & Jackman, R.W. (1985). Economic and noneconomic determinants of political democracy in the 1960s. Research in Political Sociology, 1(1), 27–48.Google Scholar
  15. Bratton, M. (2003). Briefing: Islam, democracy and public opinion in Africa. African Affairs, 102(408), 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bratton, M., & Mattes, R. (2001). Support for democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or instrumental? British Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 447–474.Google Scholar
  17. Bromley, S. (1997). Middle East exceptionalism: Myth or reality? In D. Potter, D. Goldblatt, M. Kiloh, & P. Lewis (Eds.), Democratization (pp. 321–344). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  18. Burris, C. T., & Tarpley, W. R. (1998). Religion as being: Preliminary validation of the Immanence Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 32(1), 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Canetti-Nisim, D. (2004). The effect of religiosity on endorsement of democratic values: The mediating influence of authoritarianism. Political Behavior, 26(4), 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chaibong, H. (2004). The ironies of Confucianism. Journal of Democracy, 15(3), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dekker, P., & Halman, L. (2003). The values of volunteering: Cross-cultural perspectives. New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Djupe, P. A., & Gilbert, C. G. (2006). The resourceful believer: Generating civic skills in church. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Durlauf, S. N., Kourtellos, A., & Tan, C. M. (2005). How robust are the linkages between religiosity and economic growth? Tufts University Discussion Paper Series.Google Scholar
  24. Eisenstein, M. A. (2006). Rethinking the relationship between religion and political tolerance in the US. Political Behavior, 28(4), 327–348.Google Scholar
  25. Fahlbusch, E., Lochman, M., Jan, B., William, G., Barret, D. B., & Mbiti, J. (2005). The encyclopedia of Christianity. Winona Lake, IN: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  26. Feldman, S. (1995). Answering survey questions: The measurement and meaning of public opinion. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process (pp. 249–271). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  27. Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity. Political Psychology, 24(1), 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feldman, S., & Zaller, J. R. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 268–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fernandes, S. (2009). Ethnicity, civil society, and the church: The politics of evangelical Christianity in northeast India. In D. H. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Evangelical Christianity and democracy in Asia (pp. 131–155). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Filali-Ansary, A. (1999). Muslims and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 10(3), 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Franklin, C. (1991). Eschewing obfuscation? Campaigns and the perception of U.S. Senate candidates. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1193–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  34. Gibson, J. L. (1992). The political consequences of intolerance: cultural conformity and political freedom. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 338–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gifford, P. (2008). Evangelical Christianity and democracy in Africa: A response. In T. O. Ranger (Ed.), Evangelical Christianity and democracy in Africa (pp. 225–230). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gilbert, C. P. (1993). The impact of Churches on political behavior: An empirical study. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hinnells, J. R. (1997). A new handbook of living religions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hunsberger, B. (1995). Religion and prejudice: the role of religious fundamentalism, quest and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 51(2), 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  41. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Jelen, T. G. (1992). Political Christianity: A contextual analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 692–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jelen, T. G., & Chandler, M. A. (1996). Communalism, associationalism, and the politics of lifestyle. Review of Religious Research, 38(2), 142–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (2002). Religion and politics in comparative perspective: The one the few, and the many. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Karpov, V. (2002). Tolerance in the United States and Poland. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(2), 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kedourie, E. (1994). Democracy and Arab political culture. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  47. Kellstedt, L. A., Green, J. C., Guth, J. L., & Smidt, C. E. (1997). Is there a culture war? Religion and the 1996 election. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 28–31. DC: Washington.Google Scholar
  48. Lau, S. (1989). Religious schema and values. International Journal of Psychology, 24(2), 137–156.Google Scholar
  49. Lavine, H. (2001). The electoral consequences of ambivalence toward presidential candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 915–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Layman, G. C. (1997). Religion, political behavior in the United States: The impact of beliefs, affiliations, commitment from 1980 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(2), 288–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leege, D. C. (1988). Catholics and the civic order: parish participation, politics, and civic participation. Review of Politics, 50(4), 704–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lipset, S. M. (1981). Political man: The social basis of politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lumsdaine, D. H. (2009). Evangelical Christianity and democracy in Asia. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Manza, J., & Brooks, C. (1997). The religious factor in U.S. presidential elections, 1960–1992. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 38–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marsh, C. (2005). Orthodox Christianity, civil society, and Russian democracy. Demokratizatsiya, 13(3), 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mehta, P. B. (2004). Hinduism and self-rule. Journal of Democracy, 15(3), 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meyer, K., Tope, D., & Price, A. M. (2008). Religion and support for democracy: A cross-national examination. Sociological Spectrum, 28(5), 625–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mueller, T. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes towards the involvement of religious leaders in politics: A multilevel analysis of 55 societies. World Values Research, 2(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  60. Muller, E. N., & Seligson, M. A. (1994). Civic culture and democracy: The question of causal relationships. The American Political Science Review, 88(3), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Philpott, D. (2004). The Catholic wave. Journal of Democracy, 15(2), 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  67. Radu, M. (1998). The burden of Eastern Orthodoxy. Orbis, 42(2), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ranger, T. O. (2008). Evangelical Christianity and Democracy in Africa. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 552–566.Google Scholar
  70. Roccas, S., & Schwartz, S. S. (1997). Church-state relations and the associations of religiosity with values: A study of Catholics in six countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 31, 356–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rokeach, M. (1969). Value systems and religion. Review of Religious Research, 11(1), 2–23.Google Scholar
  72. Rosema, M. (2007). Low turnout: Threat to democracy or blessing in disguise? Consequences of citizen’s varying tendencies to vote. Electoral Studies, 26(3), 612–623.Google Scholar
  73. Rudolph, T. J. (2005). Group attachment and the reduction of value-driven ambivalence. Political Psychology, 26(6), 905–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V., & Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(4), 721–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21(3), 315–338.Google Scholar
  76. Schnell, F. (1993). The foundation of abortion attitudes: The role of values and value conflict. In M. L. Coggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  78. Schwartz, S. H., & Huismans, S. (1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four Western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(1), 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagie, G. (2000). Value consensus and importance: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 465–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shah, T. S. (2004). The Bible and the ballot box: Evangelicals and democracy in the “Global South”. SAIS Review, 24(2), 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sniderman, P. M., Fletcher, J. F., Russell, P. H., & Tetlock, P. E. (1996). The clash of rights: Liberty, equality, and legitimacy in a pluralist democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Steenbergen, M. R., & Brewer, P. R. (2004). The not-so-ambivalent public: Policy attitudes in the political culture of ambivalence. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, non-attitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 93–129). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Steenbergen, M. R., & Jones, B. (2001). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tessler, M. (2002). Do Islamic orientations influence attitudes toward democracy in the Arab world? Evidence from Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, and Algeria. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43(3–5), 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2003). Bias and equivalence: Cross-cultural perspectives. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. Van de Vijver, & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 143–155). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  86. Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  87. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Visser, P. S., & Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 779–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wald, K. D. (2003). Religion and politics in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  90. Wald, K. D., Owen, D. E., & Hill, S. S. (1988). Churches as political communities. American Political Science Review, 82(3), 531–548.Google Scholar
  91. Wald, K. D., Owen, D. E., & Hill, S. S. (1990). Political cohesion in churches. The Journal of Politics, 52(2), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wald, K. D., & Smidt, C. E. (1993). Measurement strategies in the study of religion and politics. In D. C. Leege & L. A. Kellstedt (Eds.), Rediscovering the religious factor in American politics (pp. 26–52). New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  93. Weightman, S. (1997). Hinduism. In J. R. Hinnels (Ed.), A new handbook of living religions (pp. 191–255). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  94. Widgery, A. G. (1936). Living religions and modern thought. New York: Round Table Press.Google Scholar
  95. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Zaller, J. R., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Department of SociologyYeditepe UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations