Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, 346:45 | Cite as

Comparative proteomic approach to identify proteins involved in flooding combined with salinity stress in soybean

  • Iftekhar Alam
  • Shamima Akhtar Sharmin
  • Kyung-Hee Kim
  • Yong-Goo Kim
  • Jeung Joo Lee
  • Jeong Dong Bahk
  • Byung-Hyun Lee
Regular Article

Abstract

Salinity together with waterlogging or flooding, a condition that occurs frequently in the field, can cause severe damage to crops. Combined flooding and salinity decreases the growth and survival of plants more than either stress alone. We report here the first proteomic analysis to investigate the global effects of saline flooding on multiple metabolic pathways. Soybean seedlings at the emergence (VE) stage were treated with 100 mM NaCl and flooded with water or 100 mM sodium chloride solution for 2 days. Proteins were extracted from hypocotyl and root samples and analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by MALDI-TOF, MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry or immunoblotting. A total of 43 reproducibly resolved, differentially expressed protein spots visualized by Coomassie brilliant blue staining were identified by MALDI-TOF MS. Identities of several proteins were also validated by MS/MS analysis or immunoblot analysis. Twenty-nine proteins were upregulated, eight proteins were downregulated and six spots were newly induced. The identified proteins include well-known salt and flooding induced proteins as well as novel proteins expressed by the salinity-flooding combined stress. The comparative analysis identified changes at the proteome level that are both specific and part of a common or shared response. The identification of such differentially expressed proteins provides new targets for future studies that will allow assessment of their physiological roles and significance in the response of glycophytes to a combination of flooding and salinity.

Keywords

Abiotic stress Combined stress Flooding Proteome Salinity Soybean 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (MOEHRD) (KRF-2007-211-F00006). I Alam is supported by a post doctoral grant; SA Sharmin, KH Kim and YG Kim are supported by a scholarship from BK21 program at Gyeongsang National University, Republic of Korea.

Supplementary material

11104_2011_792_MOESM1_ESM.tif (2.4 mb)
Supplementary Fig. 1 Effect of flooding (F), 100 mM NaCl (S) and saline flooding (SF) on the length and fresh weight of soybean hypocotyl and root. Fresh weight was calculated from the pooled weight of 12 seedlings (TIFF 2459 kb)
11104_2011_792_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (2.5 mb)
Supplementary Fig. 2 Enlarged views of CBB-stained gels of the differentially expressed proteins (indicated by arrows) marked in Fig. 3 (PDF 2571 kb)

References

  1. Aghaei K, Ehsanpour A, Shah A, Komatsu S (2009) Proteome analysis of soybean hypocotyl and root under salt stress. Amino Acids 36:91–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal GK, Hajduch M, Graham K, Thelen JJ (2008) In-depth investigation of the soybean seed-filling proteome and comparison with a parallel study of rapeseed. Plant Physiol 148:504–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akhtar J, Gorham J, Qureshi R (1994) Combined effect of salinity and hypoxia in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and wheat-Thinopyrum amphiploids. Plant Soil 166:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akhtar J, Gorham J, Qureshi RH, Aslam M (1998) Does tolerance of wheat to salinity and hypoxia correlate with root dehydrogenase activities or aerenchyma formation? Plant Soil 201:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alam I, Lee D-G, Kim K-H, Park C-H, Sharmin S, Lee H, Oh K-W, Yun B-W, Lee B-H (2010a) Proteome analysis of soybean roots under waterlogging stress at an early vegetative stage. J Biosci 35:49–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alam I, Sharmin S, Kim K-H, Yang J, Choi M, Lee B-H (2010b) Proteome analysis of soybean roots subjected to short-term drought stress. Plant Soil 333:491–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aravind L, Koonin EV (1999) Gleaning non-trivial structural, functional and evolutionary information about proteins by iterative database searches. J Mol Biol 287:1023–1040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrett-Lennard E (1986) Effects of waterlogging on the growth and NaCl uptake by vascular plants under saline conditions. Reclamation Revegetation Res 5:245–261Google Scholar
  9. Barrett-Lennard EG (2003) The interaction between waterlogging and salinity in higher plants: causes, consequences and implications. Plant Soil 253:35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brechenmacher L, Lee J, Sachdev S, Song Z, Nguyen THN, Joshi T, Oehrle N, Libault M, Mooney B, Xu D, Cooper B, Stacey G (2009) Establishment of a protein reference map for soybean root hair cells. Plant Physiol 149:670–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chalker-Scott L (1999) Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress responses. Photochem Photobiol 70:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheeseman JM (1988) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol 87:547–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng L, Gao X, Li S, Shi M, Javeed H, Jing X, Yang G, He G (2010) Proteomic analysis of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Meer.] seeds during imbibition at chilling temperature. Mol Breed 26:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chipman D, Shaanan B (2001) The ACT domain family. Curr Opin Struct Biol 11:694–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colmer TD, Pedersen O (2008) Oxygen dynamics in submerged rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol 178:326–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colmer TD, Vos H, Pedersen O (2009) Tolerance of combined submergence and salinity in the halophytic stem-succulent Tecticornia pergranulata. Ann Bot 103:303–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Danchenko M, Skultety L, Rashydov NM, Berezhna VV, Mátel L, Salaj T, Pret’ová A, Hajduch M (2009) Proteomic analysis of mature soybean seeds from the chernobyl area suggests plant adaptation to the contaminated environment. J Proteome Res 8:2915–2922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doseff AI, Arndt KT (1995) LAS1 is an essential nuclear protein involved in cell morphogenesis and cell surface growth. Genetics 141:857–871PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Field HI, Fenyö D, Beavis RC (2002) RADARS, a bioinformatics solution that automates proteome mass spectral analysis, optimises protein identification, and archives data in a relational database. Proteomics 2:36–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franceschi V, Grimes H (1991) Induction of soybean vegetative storage proteins and anthocyanins by low-level atmospheric methyl jasmonate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:6745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gadallah MAA (1999) Effects of kinetin on growth, grain yield and some mineral elements in wheat plants growing under excess salinity and oxygen deficiency. Plant Growth Regul 27:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gallardo K, Job C, Groot SPC, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D (2002) Proteomics of Arabidopsis seed germination. A comparative study of wild-type and gibberellin-deficient seeds. Plant Physiol 129:823–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Githiri SM, Watanabe S, Harada K, Takahashi R (2006) QTL analysis of flooding tolerance in soybean at an early vegetative growth stage. Plant Breed 125:613–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gould KS, Markham KR, Smith RH, Goris JJ (2000) Functional role of anthocyanins in the leaves of Quintinia serrata A. Cunn. J Exp Bot 51:1107–1115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenway H, Gibbs J (2003) Review: Mechanisms of anoxia tolerance in plants. II. Energy requirements for maintenance and energy distribution to essential processes. Funct Plant Biol 30:999–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hashiguchi A, Sakata K, Komatsu S (2009) Proteome analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings under flooding stress. J Proteome Res 8:2058–2069PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hashimoto M, Komatsu S (2007) Proteomic analysis of rice seedlings during cold stress. Proteomics 7:1293–1302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hatton TJ, Ruprecht J, George RJ (2003) Preclearing hydrology of the Western Australia wheatbelt: target for the future. Plant Soil 257:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hilal M, Zenoff AM, Ponessa G, Moreno H, Massa EM (1998) Saline stress alters the temporal patterns of xylem differentiation and alternative oxidase expression in developing soybean roots. Plant Physiol 117:695–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK (1999) Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoshida H, Tanaka Y, Hibino T, Hayashi Y, Tanaka A, Takabe T, Takabe T (2000) Enhanced tolerance to salt stress in transgenic rice that overexpresses chloroplast glutamine synthetase. Plant Mol Biol 43:103–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hsieh M-H, Goodman HM (2002) Molecular characterization of a novel gene family encoding ACT domain repeat proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 130:1797–1806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Islam S, Malik A, Islam A, Colmer T (2007) Salt tolerance in a Hordeum marinum-Triticum aestivum amphiploid, and its parents. J Exp Bot 58:1219–1229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Janas KM, Cvikrová M, Palagiewicz A, Szafranska K, Posmyk MM (2002) Constitutive elevated accumulation of phenylpropanoids in soybean roots at low temperature. Plant Sci 163:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kahlown MA, Azam M (2002) Individual and combined effect of waterlogging and salinity on crop yields in the Indus basin. Irrigat Drain 51:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khavari-Nejad RA, Bujar M, Attaran E (2006) Evaluation of anthocyanin contents under salinity (NaCl) stress in Bellis Perennis L. In Khan MA, Weber DJ (eds) Ecophysiology of high salinity tolerant plants, pp 127–134Google Scholar
  38. Li Y, Baldauf S, Lim E-K, Bowles DJ (2001) Phylogenetic analysis of the UDP-glycosyltransferase multigene family of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem 276:4338–4343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lin CC, Kao CH (2001) Abscisic acid induced changes in cell wall peroxidase activity and hydrogen peroxide level in roots of rice seedlings. Plant Sci 160:323–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu J-J, Ekramoddoullah AKM (2006) The family 10 of plant pathogenesis-related proteins: Their structure, regulation, and function in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 68:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Luo Q, Yu B, Liu Y (2005) Differential sensitivity to chloride and sodium ions in seedlings of Glycine max and G. soja under NaCl stress. J Plant Physiol 162:1003–1012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Martino CD, Delfine S, Pizzuto R, Loreto F, Fuggi A (2003) Free amino acids and glycine betaine in leaf osmoregulation of spinach responding to increasing salt stress. New Phytol 158:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mason HS, Mullet JE (1990) Expression of two soybean vegetative storage protein genes during development and in response to water deficit, wounding, and jasmonic acid. Plant Cell 2:569–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McFarlane DJ, Williamson DR (2002) An overview of water logging and salinity in southwestern Australia as related to the ‘Ucarro’ experimental catchment. Agric Water Manage 53:5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meloni DA, Oliva MA, Martinez CA, Cambraia J (2003) Photosynthesis and activity of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and glutathione reductase in cotton under salt stress. Environ Exp Bot 49:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meuriot F, Noquet C, Avice J-C, Volenec JJ, Cunningham SM, Sors TG, Caillot S, Ourry A (2004) Methyl jasmonate alters N partitioning, N reserves accumulation and induces gene expression of a 32-kDa vegetative storage protein that possesses chitinase activity in Medicago sativa taproots. Physiol Plant 120:113–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Michalak M, Groenendyk J, Szabo E, Gold L, Opas M (2009) Calreticulin, a multi-process calcium-buffering chaperone of the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochem J 417:651–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Monks DE, Aghoram K, Courtney PD, DeWald DB, Dewey RE (2001) Hyperosmotic stress induces the rapid phosphorylation of a soybean phosphatidylinositol transfer protein homolog through activation of the protein kinases SPK1 and SPK2. Plant Cell 13:1205–1219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oliveira IC, Brears T, Knight TJ, Clark A, Coruzzi GM (2002) Overexpression of cytosolic glutamine synthetase. Relation to nitrogen, light, and photorespiration. Plant Physiol 129:1170–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pearse IS, Heath KD, Cheeseman JM (2005) Biochemical and ecological characterization of two peroxidase isoenzymes from the mangrove, Rhizophora mangle. Plant Cell Environ 28:612–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peer WA, Murphy AS (2007) Flavonoids and auxin transport: modulators or regulators? Trends Plant Sci 12:556–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pical C, Westergren T, Dove SK, Larsson C, Sommarin M (1999) Salinity and hyperosmotic stress induce rapid increases in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, diacylglycerol pyrophosphate, and phosphatidylcholine in Arabidopsis thaliana cells. J Biol Chem 274:38232–38240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reggiani R, Nebuloni M, Mattana M, Brambilla I (2000) Anaerobic accumulation of amino acids in rice roots: role of the glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase cycle. Amino Acids 18:207–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saqib M, Akhtar J, Qureshi RH (2004) Pot study on wheat growth in saline and waterlogged compacted soil: I. Grain yield and yield components. Soil and Tillage Research 77:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saqib M, Akhtar J, Qureshi RH (2005) Na+ exclusion and salt resistance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in saline-waterlogged conditions are improved by the development of adventitious nodal roots and cortical root aerenchyma. Plant Sci 169:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shimamura S, Mochizuki T, Nada Y, Fukuyama M (2003) Formation and function of secondary aerenchyma in hypocotyl, roots and nodules of soybean (Glycine max) under flooded conditions. Plant Soil 251:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sivakumar P, Sharmila P, Pardha Saradhi P (2000) Proline alleviates salt-stress-induced enhancement in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate oxygenase activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 279:512–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smedema LK, Shiati K (2002) Irrigation and salinity: a perspective review of the salinity hazards of irrigation development in the arid zone. Irrigat Drain Syst 16:161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tai F, Wang X, Xu W, Li X (2008) Characterization and expression analysis of two cotton genes encoding putative UDP-Glycosyltransferases. Mol Biol 42:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor NL, Howell KA, Heazlewood JL, Tan TYW, Narsai R, Huang S, Whelan J, Millar AH (2010) Analysis of the rice mitochondrial carrier family reveals anaerobic accumulation of a basic amino acid carrier involved in arginine metabolism during seed germination. Plant Physiol 154:691–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Teakle NL, Real D, Colmer TD (2006) Growth and ion relations in response to combined salinity and waterlogging in the perennial forage legumes Lotus corniculatus and Lotus tenuis. Plant Soil 289:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Teakle NL, Flowers TJ, Real D, Colmer TD (2007) Lotus tenuis tolerates the interactive effects of salinity and waterlogging by ‘excluding’ Na+ and Cl- from the xylem. J Exp Bot 58:2169–2180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Teakle NL, Snell A, Real D, Barrett-Lennard EG, Colmer TD (2010) Variation in salinity tolerance, early shoot mass and shoot ion concentrations within Lotus tenuis: Towards a perennial pasture legume for saline land. Crop Pasture Sci 61:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Toorchi M, Yukawa K, Nouri M-Z, Komatsu S (2009) Proteomics approach for identifying osmotic-stress-related proteins in soybean roots. Peptides 30:2108–2117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Truchet G, Roche P, Lerouge P, Vasse J, Camut S, De Billy F, Promé JC, Dénarié J (1991) Sulphated lipo-oligosaccharide signals of Rhizobium meliloti elicit root nodule organogenesis in alfalfa. Nature 351:670–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vierstra RD (2009) The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system at the nexus of plant biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:385–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vohradsky J, Branny P, Li X-M, Thompson CJ (2008) Effect of protein degradation on spot Mr distribution in 2-D gels -a case study of proteolysis during development of Streptomyces coelicolor cultures. Proteomics 8:2371–2375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Williams K, Ewel KC, Stumpf RP, Putz FE, Workman TW (1999) Sea-level rise and coastal forest retreat on the west coast of florida, USA. Ecology 80:2045–2063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wirtz KWA (1991) Phospholipid transfer proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 60:73–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Xie Y-R, Chen Z-Y, Brown RL, Bhatnagar D (2010) Expression and functional characterization of two pathogenesis-related protein 10 genes from Zea mays. J Plant Physiol 167:121–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zheng C, Jiang D, Liu F, Dai T, Jing Q, Cao W (2009) Effects of salt and waterlogging stresses and their combination on leaf photosynthesis, chloroplast ATP synthesis, and antioxidant capacity in wheat. Plant Sci 176:575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zörb C, Schmitt S, Neeb A, Karl S, Linder M, Schubert S (2004) The biochemical reaction of maize (Zea mays L.) to salt stress is characterized by a mitigation of symptoms and not by a specific adaptation. Plant Sci 167:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zubini P, Zambelli B, Musiani F, Ciurli S, Bertolini P, Baraldi E (2009) The RNA hydrolysis and the cytokinin binding activities of PR-10 proteins are differently performed by two isoforms of the Pru p 1 peach major allergen and are possibly functionally related. Plant Physiol 150:1235–1247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iftekhar Alam
    • 1
  • Shamima Akhtar Sharmin
    • 1
  • Kyung-Hee Kim
    • 1
  • Yong-Goo Kim
    • 1
  • Jeung Joo Lee
    • 2
  • Jeong Dong Bahk
    • 1
  • Byung-Hyun Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Program), IALS, PMBBRCGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuKorea
  2. 2.Department of Applied BiologyGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuKorea

Personalised recommendations