Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 179–194 | Cite as

Affection of contact and transcendental telepathy in schizophrenia and autism

  • Yasuhiko Murakami


This paper seeks to demonstrate the structural difference in communication of schizophrenia and autism. For a normal adult, spontaneous communication is nothing but the transmission of phantasía (thought) by means of perceptual objects or language. This transmission is first observed in a make-believe play of child. Husserl named this function “perceptual phantasía,” and this function presupposes as its basis the “internalized affection of contact” (which functions empirically in eye contact, body contact, or voice calling me). Regarding autism, because of the innate lack of affection of contact, intersubjective perceptual phantasía does not occur spontaneously. Consequently, autistics do not engage in make-believe play but in stereotyped and solipsistic play. Without the formation of perceptual phantasía, there is no differentiation between phantasía and perception. For this reason, people with Asperger's syndrome consider conversation not an immediate communication of thought but a logical transmission of concepts. Schizophrenia is characterized by a distortion in the internalized affection of contact, resulting in a disturbance of perceptual phantasía, and this later is covered by various symptoms—for example, delusion as a pathological kind of communication of thought. This delusion is based on the pathological internalized affection of contact represented by a terrifying Other.


Autism Schizophrenia Communication Perceptual phantasía Phantasieleib Affection of contact Transcendental telepathy Intersubjectivity 



I thank Dr. Masutomo Miyao for his kind support throughout the entire research.


  1. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Binswanger, L. (1965). Wahn. Pfullingen: G. Neske.Google Scholar
  3. Dolto, F. (1987). Dialogues québuécois. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  4. Farroni, T., et al. (2002). Eye contact detection in humans from birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(14), 9602–9605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grelotti, J., et al. (2005). fMRI activation of the fusiform gyrus and amygdala to cartoon characters but not to faces in a boy with autism. Neuropsychologia, 3, 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hooker, Ch I, et al. (2003). Brain networks for analyzing eye gaze. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(2), 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Husserl, E. (1940). Grundlegende Untersuchungen zum phänomenologischen Ursprung der Räumlichkeit der Natur. In M. Farber (Ed.), Phenomenological Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl. Cambridge/Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, E. (Hua XXIII). Phantasie, Bildbewußtsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen (1898–1925), Husserliana Band XXIII. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  9. Kant I. (1790) Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790). Hamburg: F. Meiner.Google Scholar
  10. Kimura, B. (1988). Aïda. Tokyo: Kôbundo.Google Scholar
  11. Kimura, I. (2005). Magnetoencephalographic study on the mechanisms of face and gaze perception in children with and without autism spectrum disorders. Doctoral Dissertation. Tokyo: Faculty of Medicine.Google Scholar
  12. Klein, M. (1975). The psycho-analysis of children. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Little, M. (1990). Psychotic anxieties and containment: a personal record of an analysis with Winnicott. Northvale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  14. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198(4312), 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1997). Parcours 1934–1951. Paris: Verdier.Google Scholar
  16. Minkowski, E. (1927). La schizophrénie. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  17. Murakami, Y. (2008a). Hyperbole – pour une psychopathologie lévinassienne. Amiens: Association pour la promotion de la phénoménologie.Google Scholar
  18. Murakami, Y. (2008b). Phenomenology of Autism (in Japanese). Tokyo: Keiso-Shobo.Google Scholar
  19. Murakami, Y. (2010). De la télépathie transcendantale. Annales de phénoménologie, 9, 83–95.Google Scholar
  20. Nakayasu, N., Sugiyama, T., Honda, H., Kato, S., Suzuki, K., Nakayasu, Q., et al. (2008). Asperger syndrom and schizophrenia (in Japanese). Seisinka Chiryo Gaku [Science of Cure in the Psychiatry], 23(2), 213–228.Google Scholar
  21. Pankow, G. (1977). Structure familiale et psychose. Paris: Aubier Montaigne, 1977, Flammarion 2004.Google Scholar
  22. Pankow, G. (1987). L’être-là du schzophrène. Paris: 1981, 2e éd., 1987, Flammarion 2006.Google Scholar
  23. Richir, M. (2000). Phénoménologie en esquisse. Grenoble: J. Millon.Google Scholar
  24. Richir, M. (2004). Phantasía, imagination, affectivite. Grenoble: J. Millon.Google Scholar
  25. Richir, M. (2008). La refonte de la phénoménologie. Annales de phénoménologie, 7, 199–212.Google Scholar
  26. Wicker, B., et al. (1998). Brain regions involved in the perception of gaze: a pet study. Neuroimage, 8(2), 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams, D. (1996). Like color to the blind. London: JKP.Google Scholar
  28. Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment. Madison: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  29. Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Winnicott, D. W. (1989). Psychoanalytic explorations. Cambridge: Harvard University Pres.Google Scholar
  31. Yoshikawa, R. (2005). Six cases with Asperger’s syndrome introduced for schizophrenia (in Japanese). Clinical Psychiatry, 34(9), 1245–1252.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Osaka UniversityOsakaJapan
  2. 2.OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations