The effects of educational interventions on pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards low back pain
- 242 Downloads
Background Practitioner beliefs and attitudes towards low back pain (LBP) influence treatment decisions. Little is known about pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards LBP. Objectives To investigate the effect of educational interventions on pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards LBP. Setting Sydney Metropolitan Area. Methods Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs was measured using the “Pharmacists’ Back Beliefs Questionnaire”, with items from two previously reported questionnaires on back beliefs. Responses from pharmacists attending a 2-h educational workshop on LBP (n = 204) and pharmacists recruiting participants for a LBP clinical trial (n = 66) were compared to responses from a control group of pharmacists (n = 65) to allow an evaluation of the two interventions. Responses from workshop participants were also evaluated before and after the session. Participants indicated their agreement with statements about LBP on a 5-point Likert scale. Preferred responses were based on guidelines for the evidence-based management of LBP. The primary analysis evaluated total score on the nine-inevitability items of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (“inevitability score”). Main outcome measure Inevitability score. Results There was no significant difference in inevitability score between LBP clinical trial pharmacists and the control group [mean difference (MD) 0.47 (95 % CI −1.35 to 2.29; p = 0.61)]. The educational workshop led to a significant and favourable change in inevitability score (MD 7.23 p < 0.001) and notable changes in responses to misconceptions regarding bed rest and the need for imaging (p < 0.001) among participating pharmacists. Conclusions Pharmacists attending the educational workshop provided the most compelling evidence that education specifically aimed at delivering evidence-based information can be successful in changing practitioner knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards LBP.
KeywordsAustralia Evidence-based management Community pharmacy Education Low back pain
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Dr Christine Lin, Mr Daniel Steffens, Ms Paula Beckencamp, Ms Pauline Zahara, Ms Dominique Bartlett, Mr Tarscisio Folly, Ms Amanda Hese, Ms Anurina Das, Dr Sasha Bennett, Mr Vidya Perera and all the pharmacists who participated in this study. The authors also acknowledge the financial support of The George Institute for Global Health.
This research received no specific funding from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. CAS is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award. CGM is supported by a research fellowship funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council.
Conflicts of interest
CGM and AJM are investigators on the PACE trial (http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12609000966291.aspx) which is jointly funded by a project grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council and GlaxoSmithKline.
- 2.Britt H, Miller GC, Charles J. General practice activity in Australia 2007–2008. Canberra, Australia Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. General Practice Series No. 22. Catalog No. GEP 22, 2008. ISBN: 9781740248280.Google Scholar
- 4.Lim S, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, The Global Burden of Disease Study Group. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–60.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Slater H, Briggs A, Watkins K, Chua J, Smith A. Translating evidence for low back pain management into a consumer-focussed resource for use in community pharmacies: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071918 (eCollection 2013).PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Houben RMA, Ostelo RWJG, Vlaeyen JWS, Wolters PMJC, Peters M, Stomp-van den Berg SGM. Health care providers’ orientations towards common low back pain predict perceived harmfulness of physical activities and recommendations regarding return to normal activity. Eur J Pain. 2005;9(2):173–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Kerry S, Oakeshott P, Dundas D, Williams J. Influence of postal distribution of the Royal College of Radiologists’ guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X-ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2000;17(1):46–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Gross D, Russell A, Ferrari R, Crites Battie M, Schoplocher D, Hu R, et al. The Alberta Back Pain Initiative Study: Evaluation of a population-based social marketing intervention study for the prevention of disability associated with low back pain. Final report Available at: http://www.worksafebc.com/contact_us/research/research_results/res_60_10_810.asp. Accessed June 5, 2013.
- 29.Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group. Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain—a guide for clinicians. Bowen Heads: Australian Academic Press; 2004. ISBN 9781875378524.Google Scholar
- 31.Doctors4U®—Sydney Doctors Medical Directory (2011) A-to-Z: Sydney Chemists and Pharmacies by location. http://www.doctors-4u.com/sydney/chemists_sub.htm. Accessed August 3, 2011.
- 32.Charlton JE (2005) Core curriculum for professional education in pain. Accessed from: http://www.iasp-pain.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=IASP_Press_Books2&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=2008. Accessed June 18, 2011.
- 34.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: General Characteristics of persons involved in health and community services occupations. http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468220&tab=3. Accessed July 28, 2013.
- 35.Pharmacy Board of Australia. Pharmacy Registrant Data. http://www.pharmacyboard.gov.au/About/Statistics.aspx. Accessed April 22, 2014.
- 36.National Prescribing Service. National Medicines Symposium Poster. A brief education session and participation in a clinical trial both improve pharmacists’ knowledge of evidence-based low back pain management. http://nms2012.digitalposters.com.au/posters-topics/2. Accessed July 29, 2014.
- 41.Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J, McLachlan AJ, Cooper CW, Day RO, et al. Assessment of diclofenac or spinal manipulative therapy, or both, in addition to recommended first-line treatment for acute low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9599):1638–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Strassels S, Pepin J, Petty H, Torges K, Driver L. (404) Texas pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices may contribute to inadequate pain care. J Pain. 2008;9:77.Google Scholar