Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reduced length of stay in radical cystectomy patients with oral versus parenteral post-operative nutrition protocol

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 17 March 2015

Abstract

Background In Europe, parenteral nutrition is often used after radical cystectomy to avoid postoperative malnourishment. To the best of our knowledge, however, there is a paucity of data to conclude on the best modality for delivering nutritional support to this patient group. Objective The parenteral nutrition policy was reconsidered and an oral nutrition protocol was implemented by the clinical pharmacist and evaluated in terms of length of stay, number and type of postoperative complications and parenteral nutrition avoided costs. Setting A prospective interventional non-randomized before-after study was conducted. Regular radical cystectomy patients presenting without preoperative contra-indications for enteral nutrition were eligible. Methods Postoperatively, in the control group, the parenteral nutrition policy from the ward was applied. Parenteral nutrition was initiated systematically and continued until the patient was able to tolerate solid food. In the interventional group, an oral nutrition protocol was implemented. Parenteral nutrition could be initiated if oral intake remained insufficient after 5 days. Main outcome measure The primary end point was postoperative length of stay. Secondary endpoints included the number of patients in whom the oral nutrition protocol was implemented successfully, as well as the number and type of postoperative complications. Results A total of 94 eligible patients was assigned consecutively to the control (n = 48) and to the interventional group (n = 46). Baseline demographics were comparable. A significant reduction in median length of stay was associated with the oral nutrition protocol [18 days (IQR 15–22) in the control group vs. 14 days (IQR 13–18) in the interventional group (p < 0.001)]. In 40 out of 46 patients from the interventional group, the oral nutrition protocol was implemented successfully. The number and type of postoperative complications did not differ significantly. Implementing the oral nutrition protocol resulted in a direct parenteral nutrition infusion bag cost saving of approximately €512 and a reduction in hospitalization cost of €2,608 per patient. Conclusion The findings of our study showed that an oral nutrition protocol, when compared to the systematic postoperative use of parenteral nutrition, was associated with a decreased length of stay and costs in a regular radical cystectomy patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CFU:

Colony forming units

CRBSI:

Catheter related blood stream infection

EN:

Enteral nutrition

ONP:

Oral nutrition protocol

POI:

Postoperative ileus

POCs:

Postoperative complications

PN:

Parenteral nutrition

RC:

Radical cystectomy

References

  1. Barrass BJ, Thurairaja R, Collins JW, Gillatt D, Persad RA. Optimal nutrition should improve the outcome and costs of radical cystectomy. Urol Int. 2006;77(2):139–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG. 25 years of experience with 1,000 neobladders: long-term complications. J Urol. 2011;185(6):2207–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Svatek RS, Fisher MB, Williams MB, Matin SF, Kamat AM, Grossman HB, et al. Age and body mass index are independent risk factors for the development of postoperative paralytic ileus after radical cystectomy. Urology. 2010;76(6):1419–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adamakis I, Tyritzis SI, Koutalellis G, Tokas T, Stravodimos KG, Mitropoulos D, et al. Early removal of nasogastric tube is beneficial for patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. Int Braz J Urol. 2011;37(1):42–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maffezzini M, Campodonico F, Canepa G, Gerbi G, Parodi D. Current perioperative management of radical cystectomy with intestinal urinary reconstruction for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and reduction of the incidence of postoperative ileus. Surg Oncol. 2008;17(1):41–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roth B, Birkhauser FD, Zehnder P, Thalmann GN, Huwyler M, Burkhard FC, et al. Parenteral nutrition does not improve postoperative recovery from radical cystectomy: results of a prospective randomised trial. Eur Urol. 2013;63(3):475–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maffezzini M, Gerbi G, Campodonico F, Parodi D. Multimodal perioperative plan for radical cystectomy and intestinal urinary diversion. I. Effect on recovery of intestinal function and occurrence of complications. Urology. 2007;69(6):1107–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, Fearon K, Weimann A, Bozzetti F. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: surgery. Clin Nutr. 2009;28(4):378–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazaki T, Ebisawa K. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(4):739–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shrikhande SV, Shetty GS, Singh K, Ingle S. Is early feeding after major gastrointestinal surgery a fashion or an advance? Evidence-based review of literature. J Cancer Res Ther. 2009;5(4):232–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pruthi RS, Chun J, Richman M. Reducing time to oral diet and hospital discharge in patients undergoing radical cystectomy using a perioperative care plan. Urology. 2003;62(4):661–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Joniau S, Benijts J, Van Kampen M, De Waele M, Ooms J, Van Cleynenbreugel B, et al. Clinical experience with the N-shaped ileal neobladder: assessment of complications, voiding patterns, and quality of life in our series of 58 patients. Eur Urol. 2005;47(5):666–72 discussion 72-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laffey JG, Kavanagh BP. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(11):812.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall WH, Ramachandran R, Narayan S, Jani AB, Vijayakumar S. An electronic application for rapidly calculating Charlson comorbidity score. BMC Cancer. 2004;4:94

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, Kaasinen E, Bohle A, Palou-Redorta J, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, the 2011 update. Actas Urol Esp. 2012;36(7):389–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O’Grady NP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(1):1–45.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Louie-Johnsun MW, Braslis KG, Murphy DL, Neerhut GJ, Grills RJ. Radical cystectomy for primary bladder malignancy: a 10 year review. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(4):265–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCabe JE, Jibawi A, Javle P. Defining the minimum hospital case-load to achieve optimum outcomes in radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2005;96(6):806–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malavaud B, Vaessen C, Mouzin M, Rischmann P, Sarramon J, Schulman C. Complications for radical cystectomy. Impact of the American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Eur Urol. 2001;39(1):79–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, Brooks CM, Cronin AM, Savage C, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol. 2009;55(1):164–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gregg JR, Cookson MS, Phillips S, Salem S, Chang SS, Clark PE, et al. Effect of preoperative nutritional deficiency on mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2011;185(1):90–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Declercq.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Declercq, P., De Win, G., Van der Aa, F. et al. Reduced length of stay in radical cystectomy patients with oral versus parenteral post-operative nutrition protocol. Int J Clin Pharm 37, 379–386 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0072-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0072-9

Keywords

Navigation