Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of consensus guidance to facilitate service redesign around pharmacist prescribing in UK hospital practice

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background The last decade has seen a drive towards non-medical prescribing in the United Kingdom (UK). However, there is a dearth of any published literature on applying the principles of service redesign to support pharmacist prescribing in any sphere of practice. Objective To develop consensus guidance to facilitate service redesign around pharmacist prescribing. Setting UK hospital practice. Methods The Delphi technique was used to measure consensus of a panel of expert opinion holders in Scotland. Individuals with key strategic and operational roles in implementing initiatives of pharmacy practice and medicines management were recruited as experts. An electronic questionnaire consisting of 30 statements related to pharmacist prescribing service redesign was developed. These were presented as five-point Likert scales with illustrative quotes. Main outcome measures Consensus, defined as 70 % of panel members agreeing (ranked strongly agree/agree) with each statement. Results Responses were obtained from 35/40 (87.5 %) experts in round one and 29 (72.5 %) in round two. Consensus in round one was achieved for 27/30 of statements relating to aspects of generic ‘service development’ (e.g. succession planning, multidisciplinary working, quality evaluation, practice development and outcome measures) and ‘pharmacist prescribing role development’ (e.g. education and future orientation of service). Issues of disagreement were around targeting of pharmacist prescribing to clinical specialities and financial remuneration for prescribing in the hospital setting. Conclusion Consensus guidance has been developed to facilitate service redesign around hospital pharmacist prescribing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stewart D, MacLure K, George J. Educating non-medical prescribers. Brit J Clin Pharm. 2013;74(4):662–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Latter S, Blenkinsopp A, Smith A, Chapman S, Tinelli M, Gerard K, Little P, Celino N, Granby T, Nicholls P, Dorer G. Evaluation of nurse and pharmacist independent prescribing. London: Department of Health; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Department of Health (2014) Non-medical prescribing programme. http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/non-medical-prescribing. Accessed Jul 2014.

  4. Tonna AP, Stewart D, West B, McCaig D. Pharmacist prescribing in the UK—a literature review of current research and practice. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007;32:545–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper RJ, Anderson C, Avery T, Bissell P, Guillaume L, Hutchinson A, James V, Lymn J, McIntosh A, Murphy E. Nurse and pharmacist supplementary prescribing in the UK—a thematic review of the literature. Health Policy. 2008;85:277–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. General Pharmaceutical Council (2014) Indicative curriculum for the education and training of pharmacist independent prescribers, London. http://www.pharmacyregulation.org/sites/default/files/Pharmacist%20Independent%20Prescribing%20-%20Learning%20Outcomes%20and%20Indicative%20Content.pdf. Accessed Jul 2014.

  7. George J, McCaig D, Bond C, Cunningham S, Diack L, Watson A, Stewart D. Supplementary prescribing: early experiences of pharmacists in Great Britain. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:843–1850.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smalley L. Patients’ experiences of pharmacist-led supplementary prescribing in primary care. Pharm J. 2006;276:567–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hobson RJ, Sewell GJ. Supplementary prescribing by pharmacists in England. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63(3):244–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. George J, McCaig D, Bond C, Cunningham S, Diack L, Stewart D. Benefits and challenges of prescribing training and implementation: perceptions and early experiences of RPSGB prescribers. Int J Pharm Pract. 2007;15:23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. George J, Bond C, McCaig D, Cleland J, Cunningham S, Diack L, Stewart D. Experiential learning as part of pharmacist supplementary prescribing training: feedback from trainees and their mentors. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:1031–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper R, Lymn J, Anderson C, Avery A, Bissel P, Guillaume L, Hutchinson A, Murphy E, Ratcliffe J, Ward P. Learning to prescribe–pharmacists’ experiences of supplementary prescribing training in England. BMC Med Ed. 2008;8:57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart DC, George J, Bond CM, Cunningham ITS, Diack LH, McCaig DJ. Exploring patients’ perspectives of pharmacist supplementary prescribing in Scotland. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30:892–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart DC, George J, Bond CM, Diack LH, McCaig DJ, Cunningham ITS. Views of pharmacist prescribers, doctors and patients on pharmacist prescribing implementation. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17:89–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hobson RJ, Scott J, Sutton J. Pharmacists and nurses as independent prescribers: exploring the patient’s perspective. Fam Pract. 2010;27(1):110–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ross S, Bond C, Rothnie H, Thomas S, MacLeod MJ. What is the scale of prescribing errors committed by junior doctors? A systematic review. Brit J Clin Pharm. 2009;67(6):629–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement (2014) Quality and service improvement tools. http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/quality_and_service_improvement_tools/role_redesign.html. Accessed Jul 2014.

  18. Campbell SM, Cantrill JA. Consensus methods in prescribing research. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001;26:5–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. James DH, Hatten S, Roberts D, John DN. Identifying criteria for assessing the quality of medicines use review referral documentation by community pharmacists. Int J Pharm Pract. 2008;16:365–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Franklin BD, O’Grady K. Dispensing errors in community pharmacy: frequency, clinical significance and potential impact of authentication at the point of dispensing. Int J Pharm Pract. 2007;15:273–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pfleger DE, McHattie LW, Diack HL, McCaig DJ, Stewart DC. Developing consensus around the pharmaceutical public health competencies for community pharmacists in Scotland. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30:111–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Power A, McKellar S, Hudson S. A consensus model for delivery of structured pharmaceutical care for the patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus by Scottish community pharmacists. Int J Pharm Pract. 2007;15:283–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McDermott JH, Caiola SM, Kuhn KF, Stritter FT, Beza J. A Delphi survey to identify the components of a community pharmacy clerkship. Am J Pharm Ed. 1995;59:334–41.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meadows AB, Maine LL, Keyes EK, Pearson K, Finstuen K. Pharmacy executive leadership issues and associated skills, knowledge, and abilities. J Am Pharm Ass. 2005;45:55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Meadows AB, Finstuen K, Hudak RP. Pharmacy executives: leadership issues and associated skills, knowledge and abilities in the US Department of Defense. J Am Pharm Ass. 2003;43:412–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan A, Tan S, Wong CM, Yap KY, Ko Y. Clinically significant drug–drug interactions between oral anticancer agents and nonanticancer agents: a Delphi survey of oncology pharmacists. Clin Ther. 2009;31:2379–8627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. Brit Med J. 1995;311:376–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Tonna AP, Stewart DC, West B, McCaig DJ. Exploring pharmacists’ perceptions of the feasibility and value of pharmacist prescribing of antimicrobials in secondary care in Scotland. Int J Pharm Pract. 2010;18:312–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Crisp J, Pelletier D, Duffield C, Adams A, Nagy S. The Delphi Method? Nurs Res. 1997;46:116–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Von Der Gracht HA. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2012;79:1525–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. NHS Health Development Agency. Clarifying health impact assessment, integrated impact assessment and health needs assessment. London: Health Development Agency; 2003. ISBN 1-84279-242-3.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tolson D, West B. An exploration of role development in nursing and midwifery. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the participation of all external opinion holders.

Funding

The research was funded by Robert Gordon University.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK

    Antonella Tonna, Dorothy McCaig, Lesley Diack & Derek Stewart

  2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK

    Bernice West

Authors
  1. Antonella Tonna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dorothy McCaig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lesley Diack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bernice West
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Derek Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek Stewart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tonna, A., McCaig, D., Diack, L. et al. Development of consensus guidance to facilitate service redesign around pharmacist prescribing in UK hospital practice. Int J Clin Pharm 36, 1069–1076 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-014-9996-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-014-9996-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation