Slovenian pharmacy performance: a patient-centred approach to patient satisfaction survey content development
- 360 Downloads
Objective To identify content of pharmacy performance relevant to patient satisfaction. Setting Interviews with pharmacy users were conducted at their homes. The Delphi meeting was run at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Method A two-phase process was employed. In Phase I, interviews with 43 pharmacy users were conducted to identify patients’ experiences and expectations relating to pharmacies. The content analysis of their responses resulted in a list of themes from which items were generated. In Phase II, a 10 member expert panel was employed in a two round Delphi technique to rate the importance of each item for the patient satisfaction. Main outcome measure Themes derived from the interviews and their importance for patient satisfaction as assessed by the expert panel. Results Seventy-nine themes were generated from the survey responses which were grouped into four main categories: ‘Relations’, ‘Counseling’, ‘Physical facilities and location’ and ‘Process’. In total, 69 items were generated. The expert panel rated 84% of generated items as very or somewhat important. Conclusion The qualitative study provides insights on the content of pharmacy performance relevant to patients. Identified categories encompass a wide range of issues that contribute to patient satisfaction with pharmacy performance.
KeywordsDelphi technique Pharmacy Patient satisfaction Qualitative research Slovenia
The authors would like to thank the pharmacy users and the members of the expert panel who participated in this study.
No separate funding was obtained for this study. Authors are researchers at the University of Ljubljana—Faculty of Pharmacy, which has contributed to financing the study.
Conflicts of interest
The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 2.Schommer J, Kucukarslan S. Measuring patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical services. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997;54(23):2721–32; quiz 41-3.Google Scholar
- 3.MacKinnon NJ. Striving beyond patient satisfaction: a roadmap for pharmacists [Internet]. Bartlett: InetCE; 2005 [cited 15 July 2010]. Available from: http://www.inetce.com/articles/pdf/221-999-05-007-H04.pdf.
- 4.Pasco GC. Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3–4):185–210.Google Scholar
- 12.Stepan A, Toth M, Petrič D, Kramberger B. Sistemi financiranja v zdravstvu: mednarodna primerjava. Ljubljana: Zavod za zdravstveno zavarovanje Slovenije; 1999.Google Scholar
- 16.Sirdeshmukh D, Pathak DS, Kucukarslan SN, Segal R, Kier KL, Aversa SL. Patient satisfaction/dissatisfaction and post-exchange actions in the high blood pressure prescription drug market: a preliminary report. J Consum Satisfac Dissatisfac Complain Behav. 1991;4:84–92.Google Scholar
- 20.Schommer J. Higher levels of consultation services increase patient satisfaction. Am Pharm. 1995;NS35(8):33–39.Google Scholar
- 21.Schommer JC. Roles of normative and predictive expectations in evaluation of pharmacist consultation services. J Consum Satisfac Dissatisfac Complain Behav. 1996;9:86–94.Google Scholar
- 32.Mobach MP. Counter design influences the privacy of patients in health care. Soc Sci Med [Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2009;68(6):1000–1005.Google Scholar
- 34.Bednarczyk RA, Nadeau JA, Davis CF, McCarthy A, Hussain S, Martiniano R, et al. Privacy in the pharmacy environment: analysis of observations from inside the pharmacy. J Am Pharm Assoc. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 2010;50(3):362–367.Google Scholar
- 35.Beardsley RS, Kimberlin CL, Tindall WN. Communication skills in pharmacy practice: a practical guide for students and practitioners. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.Google Scholar